Check out some similar questions!

tomder55 · Mar 29, 2011, 06:03 AM

I think it's slam dunk . They haven't gone after MM before because MM never before declared it's sole purpose is to take down FOX .

NeedKarma · Mar 29, 2011, 06:04 AM

Originally Posted by tomder55

I think it's slam dunk . They haven't gone after MM before because MM never before declared it's sole purpose is to take down FOX before.

Since MM hasn't declared that then there is no case. And just saying "my purpose is to take you down" is not actionable.

tomder55 · Mar 29, 2011, 06:09 AM

He didn't just say it . He showed Politico the internal memo . I'd tie them up in court ,get their emails and all internal correspondence in discovery. Let's see how long their resources last against News Corp .
Maybe Soros will give them another 'charitable ' contribution .

NeedKarma · Mar 29, 2011, 06:21 AM

Originally Posted by tomder55

I'd tie them up in court ,get their emails and all internal correspondence in discovery. Let's see how long their resources last against News Corp .

That just shows how vindinctive your ilk is. As Tut demonstrated with steve, logic plays no part in your thinking, you just want the other side to "hurt'. The world needs less people like that, wasting resources.

tomder55 · Mar 29, 2011, 06:35 AM

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

That just shows how vindinctive your ilk is. As Tut demonstrated with steve, logic plays no part in your thinking, you just want the other side to "hurt'. The world needs less people like that, wasting resources.

Lol ,that seems to be the sole rational existence to MM

speechlesstx · Mar 29, 2011, 07:26 AM

Originally Posted by TUT317

If someone were top come up with some corroborating evidence then that is fine- problem solved. Until that happens it is still a theory.

So all news reporting is simply theoretical until someone shows the video, transcript or whatever?

I guess you're just way too smart for me, dude. I don't find it necessary to over-think and over-analyze everything. When I read an alleged quote by someone who is in the business of "watching" the media, I believe it to be true until they object. That is only logical.

speechlesstx · Mar 29, 2011, 07:38 AM

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

That just shows how vindinctive your ilk is. As Tut demonstrated with steve, logic plays no part in your thinking, you just want the other side to "hurt'. The world needs less people like that, wasting resources.

Tut was completely illogical in my opinion, I'm the only one who has presented any real evidence thus far, you two are basing your 'logic' on a lack of evidence to the contrary.

As for your absurd accusation that I 'just want the other side to "hurt,"' where's the proof?

tomder55 · Mar 29, 2011, 07:59 AM

Don't you see the important work that MM is doing with your tax dollar ? Their investigators uncovered a memo that references Obama to "socialism, liberalism, Marxism "... ooooooooohhhh!! Breaking News!!

speechlesstx · Mar 29, 2011, 08:09 AM

Yep, they do fine work. I can't think of a better way to spend my tax dollars.

excon · Mar 29, 2011, 08:17 AM

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Yep, they do fine work. I can't think of a better way to spend my tax dollars.

Hello steve:

YOUR tax dollars?? I thought right wingers believed that if you made it, it was YOURS - not the governments'. You sound like you believe they're spending YOUR money...

If that's so, can I complain about the way your church spends ITS money?? Let me know, cause I WILL.

excon

tomder55 · Mar 29, 2011, 08:19 AM

I'm all in favor of removing the tax break for churches. I think that violates the establishment clause.

speechlesstx · Mar 29, 2011, 08:42 AM

When my church violates its tax status feel free to complain all you want.

excon · Mar 29, 2011, 08:47 AM

Hello again, steve:

What makes you think that Media Matters broke theirs?

excon

speechlesstx · Mar 29, 2011, 08:58 AM

I believe tom already answered that one.

More importantly, do we have a league yet?

excon · Mar 29, 2011, 09:06 AM

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

I believe tom already answered that one.

More importantly, do we have a league yet?

Hello again, Steve:

Yeah, I missed that part of my own stinkin thread. Getting old, you know.

Yes, we have a league. Haven't you been getting my emails? Draft is TONIGHT at 9 eastern, if I can get the time. But, I just found out we can wait till the middle of April - not that we want to, but I thought we were rushed.

excon

speechlesstx · Mar 29, 2011, 09:25 AM

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, Steve:

Yeah, I missed that part of my own stinkin thread. Getting old, you know.

Yes, we have a league. Haven't you been getting my emails? Draft is TONIGHT at 9 eastern, if I can get the time. But, I just found out we can wait till the middle of April - not that we want to, but I thought we were rushed.

I thought it was the 30th. Either way I'll probably have to set mine to autodraft and hope for the best. Usually works well for tom. Somehow every year he gets Peyton Manning and never shows up for the draft.

tomder55 · Mar 29, 2011, 09:33 AM

Lol... It's how you rearrange the players . (about to give up one of my secrets)
Go to your team and open
Edit Pre-Draft Player Rankings
You can move them up or down depending on your preference and hope no one picks them first .
On Edit Auto strategy you can prioritize by position or stats .

I didn't select Manning last year . I moved Brees up .

speechlesstx · Mar 29, 2011, 09:50 AM

I know how to rearrange the draft order, I'm just clueless about fantasy MLB. I'll learn though. :)

tomder55 · Mar 29, 2011, 10:01 AM

The trick in Rotisserie is that it's unusual that you are the best in all the stats . If you are weak in one you can either strengthen your team in that or try to get stronger in other stats.

The biggest challenge is that stats compile daily so you have to keep up moving players in and out of the lineup ;especially pitchers.

speechlesstx · Mar 29, 2011, 11:03 AM

And sometimes you get a liberal on Fox that calls other libs on their BS...

Kirsten Powers Takes On Bill Maher: His Comments On Bachmann, Palin Are Degrading To ‘All Women'