Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #41

    Jun 20, 2013, 03:04 PM
    “If towns remain divided—if Catholics and Protestants can't see ourselves in one another and fear or resentment are allowed to harden—that too encourages division and discourages cooperation,” the US president said.

    Understand?
    Athos's Avatar
    Athos Posts: 1,108, Reputation: 55
    Ultra Member
     
    #42

    Jun 20, 2013, 03:35 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    “If towns remain divided—if Catholics and Protestants can’t see ourselves in one another and fear or resentment are allowed to harden—that too encourages division and discourages cooperation,” the US president said.

    Understand?
    Interesting. You've changed what he said, kept it in quotes, and made no attempt to show how you are now misquoting him. Leaving out the all-important "schools" may help your agenda but lays bare what you did.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #43

    Jun 20, 2013, 03:46 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    “If towns remain divided—if Catholics and Protestants can’t see ourselves in one another and fear or resentment are allowed to harden—that too encourages division and discourages cooperation,” the US president said.

    Understand?
    What Athos said. Tis not I who does not understand.

    You want an honest debate? Ok, I'll grant you that those other things also discourage cooperation in Obama's eyes if you'll grant that one doesn't single out Catholic and Protestant schools unless they're meant to be a specific target.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #44

    Jun 20, 2013, 03:55 PM
    He was in Ireland talking to Catholics and Protestants. Both CHRISTIANS. That's the audience he was speaking to, EQUALLY. He said you guys done good keep up the good work.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #45

    Jun 20, 2013, 04:52 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    does this wanker go around interferring in the internal affairs of any place he sets his foot.

    The Irish problems go way back to the Norman conquest and the treatment of the natives, now where have I heard that before, what England did in Ireland was genocide over many centuries and the resentment remains.Omama has forgotten his roots otherwise he wouldn't talk that way to an oppressed people
    Yup , now I'm the 1st to admit that the IRA was a bunch of bad actors that made the situation worse. But there is no doubt that the problems in Northern Ireland were the result of the Brits trying to maintain an empire there.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #46

    Jun 20, 2013, 05:09 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    yup , now I'm the 1st to admit that the IRA was a bunch of bad actors that made the situation worse. But there is no doubt that the problems in Northern Ireland were the result of the Brits trying to maintain an empire there.
    I don't applaud the IRA Tom they are like the Taliban and while they operate peace wasn't possible, but there are times when a population must stand up to the bullying. In Ireland that bullying was by a protected minority who used religious grounds for their discrimination I have heard masons in Scotland say how dedicated they were to supporting what the protestants in Ireland were doing even to the point of fighting
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #47

    Jun 21, 2013, 06:25 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    He was in Ireland talking to Catholics and Protestants. Both CHRISTIANS. That's the audience he was speaking to, EQUALLY. He said you guys done good keep up the good work.
    So in other words you don't want to have an honest discussion.
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #48

    Jun 22, 2013, 07:52 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    So in other words you don't want to have an honest discussion.
    If you want to have an honest discussion then you would need to change your idea that the conflict was predominately a religious conflict. History doesn't seem to support the idea of religious wars. By this I mean the conflict could just as easily be viewed as an ethnic conflict.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #49

    Jun 22, 2013, 08:46 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    So in other words you don't want to have an honest discussion.
    I am having one, and have submitted my honest opinion on what the President said.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuttyd View Post
    If you want to have an honest discussion then you would need to change your idea that the conflict was predominately a religious conflict. History doesn't seem to support the idea of religious wars. By this I mean the conflict could just as easily be viewed as an ethnic conflict.
    I can agree but separating an ethnic group from their religion, especially when its thrown in the mix by one side or another, rightly or wrongly, is extremely difficult. Religious principle is often tied to ethnic identity.

    Most conflicts I think are simply promoting self interest of who controls what, and who is enriched by it. Be it tribes and territory, or governments and nations. US vs THEM is never a good starting point for cooperation and MUTUAL benefit.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #50

    Jun 22, 2013, 08:50 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    I am having one, and have submitted my honest opinion on what the President said.
    I've decided "an honest discussion" means we all have to agree. I've disagreed, given my opinion, and been scolded for not being honest.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #51

    Jun 22, 2013, 09:42 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuttyd View Post
    If you want to have an honest discussion then you would need to change your idea that the conflict was predominately a religious conflict. History doesn't seem to support the idea of religious wars. By this I mean the conflict could just as easily be viewed as an ethnic conflict.
    Tut, did you miss my words in the OP?

    'I guess he doesn't realize The Troubles wasn't really a religious conflict'
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #52

    Jun 22, 2013, 09:43 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    I've decided "an honest discussion" means we all have to agree. I've disagreed, given my opinion, and been scolded for not being honest.
    That was totally dishonest.
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #53

    Jun 23, 2013, 04:01 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    text is here ..
    Obama?s Speech in Belfast to Youth of Northern Ireland | IIP Digital

    Nothing distorted . He equated Catholic Schools with segregation .
    Not exactly.If you read a little further on you would see that he equated segregated schools, housing and lack of job opportunity as symbols of divisions rather than actual divisions. I think he got that bit right. Symbolism has always been important in Northern Irish politics. Probably still does.

    In the quote provided by the OP he does appear to make reference to actual schools and institutions as a source of divisions, but this is further complicated whereby he again talks about these these things in terms of symbols in the following paragraph.

    This is why it is important to provide all quotes that are relevant to the issue. Not just partial quotes
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #54

    Jun 23, 2013, 05:06 AM
    You can parse it that way if you choose. Bottom line is that the implied message is a call for an end to separate Protestant and Catholic educational institutions.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #55

    Jun 23, 2013, 05:23 AM
    I don't get what's so difficult to understand, he said flat out If Catholics and Protestants have separate schools it contributes to division and discourages cooperation. There can only be one implied meaning, that has to end.
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #56

    Jun 23, 2013, 05:58 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    You can parse it that way if you choose. Bottom line is that the implied message is a call for an end to separate Protestant and Catholic educational institutions.


    The problem is that your bottom line is not everyone's bottom line. This is why I will give the preceding bit that was left out of the OP posting:

    Because issues like segregated schools and housing, lack of jobs and opportunity--SYMBOLS OF HISTORY* that are of pride for some and pain for others--these are not a tangential to peace, there essential to it.. . * my emphasis.

    It then goes on to the OP posted quote
    .
    My bottom line is different to your bottom line. This is why anyone who provides an OP quote needs to include all relevant information. Everyone is free to give their bottom line AFTER they have given the complete picture.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #57

    Jun 23, 2013, 06:04 AM
    Why is it you don't hold the others here to that standard? You let much more egregious violations of your standard go on a regular basis.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #58

    Jun 23, 2013, 06:18 AM
    Maybe the Catholic Bishops of Ireland missed all the subtle nuance.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #59

    Jun 23, 2013, 06:48 AM
    Hopefully they revisit the entirety of this speech and temper their reaction because its notable that not everyone who heard it came to the same conclusion as the bishops did.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #60

    Jun 23, 2013, 07:01 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    I don't get what's so difficult to understand, he said flat out If Catholics and Protestants have separate schools it contributes to division and discourages cooperation. There can only be one implied meaning, that has to end.
    No, there are other solutions.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

From Religious Affiliation to No Religious Association [ 17 Answers ]

I just wanted to know if there are people here who have chosen to leave a certain religious community and did not replace it with another...like going from Christianity to atheism for example... If so, what was it like to tell your family? Did they push you away, try to change you, or accept...

Are city schools or ruaral schools better? [ 5 Answers ]

Are city schools or ruaral schools better in your opinions? What are the pros and cons for each type?

Obama : Rich, Religious, Exclusive [ 10 Answers ]

washingtonpost.com As a Christian concervative, I applaud the Obama's decision to send their daughters to the best school possible within their means. Every parent wants to give to their child what they might not have had growing up. But what do you lefties think? Rich:


View more questions Search