[NeedKarma]

See this is a discussion of issues that is more positive. There are sites that discuss the issues like adults, they link to the candidates stance on the various issues and debate which platform would give the most positive benefit. This forum has more negative campaigning than the actual live campaign.

[N0help4u]

I am positive
I positive that they ALL scare me!

[Skell]

Relax. They couldn't possibly do worse than your current goose, so you'll be fine.

[N0help4u]

... and they THOUGHT nobody could be worse than Clinton or some others :(

[rodandy12]

With Clinton we had two years of budget surplus.

What are you folks looking for in a president? Jimmy Carter was "a good man" but not much of a president. JFK was an arrogant SOB and we loved him... except that he almost started WWIII. We loved Nixon and he might be the best foreign policy president we've had in the last 50 years, but he was a crook.

Given all the variation we've had, it is hard to say any particular person couldn't turn into something special. Even Bush was special for a while just after 9/11. In the end, I think we need more John Waynes these days. He once said, "He wasn't my candidate, but since he was elected, I'll support him." (Can't remember which election that was.)

[speechlesstx]

Odd you say that since I've rarely seen more people dedicated to divisiveness that the neocon group here.

Personally, I love to be insulted and misrepresented by someone taking the positive, adult approach in condemning "divisiveness." :D

[tomder55]

Oh how boring it would be if we all agreed !