[talaniman]

He isn't a whistle blower, he stole and ran to the competition and justified it as being for YOUR own good.

[tomder55]

I'll give even money that some of these weapons ends up in the West Bank and Gaza.

[speechlesstx]

He isn't a whistle blower, he stole and ran to the competition and justified it as being for YOUR own good.

Um, we're talking about Mark Thompson, not Snowden.

[smoothy]

hey let's get beyond this. Bush lied. There were no WMD in Iraq. We know there were undisirables in Iraq but no WMD. Why. because of fear, nothing more. Bengahazi, well here we have something different, CIA maybe, who knows the spooks have been busy again.I can't deny that, itis obvious

Um... they have satellite videos of trucks hauling stuff from site that did have them across the border to Syria...

Never mind the fact Saddam killed a huge number of Kurds with poison gas... which is a WMD... which is a tad worse then a case of farts after eating at Taco Bell.

And Saddam himself amitted he had them... you can't defend a mas murderer when he keeps standing up proclaiming he did it...

[tomder55]

Anyone else longing for the day when al Qaeda was "decimated" and "on the run?"

Eli Lake reported last week that on the contrary ;AQ has a structured hierarchy . His report claims that AQ leader Zawahiri and others had a 'virtual board meeting ' via conference call. During the meeting, the leader of the Yemini affiliate was promoted to general manager putting a lie to the claim that AQ is a decentralized loose knit group of independent jihadist groups (many of which we secretely armed in an attempt to oust Assad in Syria) .The promotion effectively gave the leader of al Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen operational control of al Qaeda’s many affiliates throughout the Muslim world. It was in fact this meeting that triggered the US response of shutting down it's embassies in many parts of the world.
Al Qaeda Conference Call Intercepted by U.S. Officials Sparked Alerts - The Daily Beast

[speechlesstx]

Eli Lake reported last week that on the contrary ;AQ has a structured heirarchy . His report claims that AQ leader Zawahiri and others had a 'virtual board meeting ' via conference call. During the meeting, the leader of the Yemini affiliate was promoted to general manager putting a lie to the claim that AQ is a decentralized loose knit group of independent jihadist groups (many of which we secretely armed in an attempt to oust Assad in Syria) .The promotion effectively gave the leader of al Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen operational control of al Qaeda’s many affiliates throughout the Muslim world. It was in fact this meeting that triggered the US response of shutting down it's embassies in many parts of the world.
Al Qaeda Conference Call Intercepted by U.S. Officials Sparked Alerts - The Daily Beast

Just last week the State Department said the "Al Qaeda core has been weakened, decimated."

Still flying that "mission accomplished" banner prematurely.

[talaniman]

They are like drug dealers, get one another takes its place.

[smoothy]

And like rats... if you let them breed you be waist deep in them eventually.

[paraclete]

And like rats...if you let them breed you be waist deep in them eventually.

Well they have been trying to stop them breeding but it's like trying to stop Muslims breeding

[tomder55]

During the House Oversight and Government Reform hearing about Benghazi the majority of class act Dems on the Committee left the room and refused to listen to the testimony of Patricia Smith, mother of Sean Smith ,and Charles Woods ,the father of Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods... both killed in the attack.

[smoothy]

well thay have been trying to stop them breeding but it's like trying to stop Muslims breeding

That's because there is a shortage of sheep and goats in the Middle east... they are desperate so they bang their women.


That and the need to breed more bomb porters.

[speechlesstx]

Those silly Democrats, they love to use children and sick people as props for their agenda push but when it comes time to listen to inconvenient victims' families looking for answers instead of broken promises and obstruction, they aren't interested.

"What difference does it make" seems to be the entire Democratic Party's official position on Benghazi.

[excon]

Hello again, Steve:

they aren't interested.

Nahhhh. Issa couldn't tell the truth if he tried.

Excon

[speechlesstx]

Hello again, Steve:
Nahhhh. Issa couldn't tell the truth if he tried.

excon

They walked on families who were promised an explanation, not Issa.

[paraclete]

"What difference does it make" seems to be the entire Democratic Party's official position on Benghazi.

Yes it echo's the position of their former Secretary of State but the point is it makes no difference, the events have faded into history and there are bigger fish to fry

[smoothy]

Valerie Plame was a non issue they beat to death... 4 people including an Ambassador died in Benghazi... and they have been telling lies since the first hours.

[paraclete]

Valerie Plame was a non issue they beat to death.....4 people including an Ambassador died in Benghazi.....and they have been telling lies since the first hours.

Yes and because of political motivation they will continue to tell lies. Disgusting as it maybe, it has been politised and that is what can be expected

[speechlesstx]

It's begun, the media is increasingly engaged in "Hillary the whitewash," or is it just more liberal aversion to reality? Either way...

At State, she was the head of a smoothly running 70,000-person institution, and fully her own woman, whose marriage to a former president was, when it was mentioned, purely an asset. And now that she’s left State, Clintonworld is being refashioned along new lines, rationalized and harmonized.

Exactly what did she accomplish between the "reset" button and "“What difference at this point does it make" besides failing to secure her Benghazi project leading to the deaths of four Americans including an ambassador? "Smoothly running?"

The author did mention Benghazi, on page 4, and portrays her "what difference" remark as some kind of courageous response to "a heated Republican attack".

Sorry, there's nothing courageous about sending someone else out with deliberately misleading talking points when it should be you and then indignantly dodging the question.

[talaniman]

You never liked her any way, so what difference does it make now?

[speechlesstx]

You never liked her any way, so what difference does it make now?

I'd prefer not to have another presidential election based on some mythical superhero riding in to save us from all of mankind's ills, propped up by a glowing media narrative that covers for her every blemish while being attack dogs for the Democratic Party. That's what difference it makes, I want a fair and honest debate.