 |
|
| Browse | Ask | Answer | Search | Join/Login |
|
|
||||
|
Yes, Tutty, I was going to get to that point eventually.
Apparently some think you can't yell "Fire" in a crowded theater but you can threaten to kill the president
it's OK if the president is part of the other political party then the one they support.
‘Piece of Sh** Should Die’: 10 of the Most Vile and Virulent Responses to President Bush’s Heart Surgery | TheBlaze.com Bill Maher Sorry the Assassination Attempt on Cheney Failed Bill Maher Wants To Celebrate Cheney's Death |
||||
|
||||
|
See... the US is full of people who hate. Quite sad to see, but glad I'm not part of it.
'Get Out Of J'lem Or You're Dead' Isn't Hate Crime - Global Agenda - News - Israel National News Burning Jews Not a Hate Crime in Canada |
||||
|
||||
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Actually I had this in mind this: " The US. Supreme Court has held that government may not prohibit free speech that advocates illegal or subversive activity unless 'such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action that is likely to incite or produce such action' " legal dictionary/free dictionary.com |
||||
|
||||
|
No there wasn't a threat.
Meanwhile, you just can't make this stuff up. A guy who championed NY's SAFE act violated the law by carrying his permitted gun into a school, causing a lock down and his buddies defend him, saying his presence with a gun could have saved students if there were a real problem. Gee, that argument sounds familiar. Associates defend man who had gun in school - City & Region - The Buffalo News |
||||
|
||||
|
Guns arn't the answer, they never were, they didn't protect you in 1812 and they don't protect you today
In an ironic turn of events, Ferguson was charged with two counts of criminal possession of a weapon under that law for Thursday’s incident. The law carries a maximum sentence of up to four years in state prison.
Some gun advocates opposed to the SAFE Act have argued that the law actually makes schools less safe since law-abiding handgun owners cannot possess their weapons on school grounds, while mass murderers have never heeded laws making schools gun-free zones. Ferguson held a New York State licensed pistol permit, but that makes no difference under the law. “The more they make these gun-free zones, the more they make people vulnerable to mass killers like at Columbine and Sandy Hook,” said Stephen J. Aldstadt, a Colden resident who serves as president of the state Shooters Committee on Political Education. Some of Ferguson’s supporters echoed similar criticism, saying that carrying a weapon meant Ferguson could have helped police in the event there was a gunman actually threatening students. “Dwayne probably was in a position to help the police not knowing that he was the one they were looking for,” said George Johnson, president of Buffalo United Front, Home Invasion Attempt Stopped By Woman WIth A Shotgun - Los Angeles Local News | FOX 11 LA KTTV You worry about your country, leave my rights alone |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Just in the interests of good journalism. As far as the report in the paper is concerned there was only ONE person actually supporting the Shooters' Committee on Political Education. The other quotes don't actually support that position. |
||||
|
||||
|
not the point I was making Speech, the number of times carrying a gun has averted an incident is few, knowing there was an armed population didn't frighten the British off. If you are not allowed to carry guns in some places this does not breach your constitutional rights. The whole point is to keep guns out of the hands of F**kwits who think they are the law as well as keeping them out of the hands of nuts, crims, kids, in fact anyone who doesn't have a legitimate reason to have one, therefore the ID of gun owners should be checked regularly and their storage checked also
|
||||
|
||||
|
If this represents what you call a "few" then can I get a "few" dollars from you?
Private Guns Stop Crime 2.5M Times A Year In US |
||||
|
||||
|
Interesting statistics I suppose you will tell me next that the 30000 people who lose their lives in gun violence every year are the perps and not the victims. You are in deniel, the level of gun violence in your society correlates to the level of gun ownership, the more guns they more gun violence, not less. What you are also telling me is you need 250 million guns to prevent 2.5 million crimes, I would say the deterrent isn't very effective as the effectiveness is only 1%.
You know the crimes guns don't prevent, drug distribution, driveby shootings, fraud but what they enable is mass murder. You want to rid the world of WMD, I say you start with guns |
||||
Not your question?
Ask your question
View similar questions
| Question Tools | Search this Question |
Add your answer here.
View more questions Search
|
