 |
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:09 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
Does it matter HOW?
Yes.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:17 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Yes.
You didn't answer how this is worse than what Hillary Clinton did in Filegate with truly private records.
And you never answered if the any or all of the next republican candidtates for anything refuses to disclose any records if you would support that with the same gusto.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:19 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Smoothy, do you know HOW they tried to get the records?
I thought what Wikileaks showed was that it didn't really matter how information is obtained .
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:20 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
As opposed to an Obama buttkisser who believes anything their party tells them to believe? None of which can be backed up with any evidence about the Messiahs claimed intelligence....etc.
I ask for proof he is as smart as your side claims.....your side just believes he is the Messiah and if he says he is that smart then he is.
And that Nothing halfway through his term is his fault yet. And your side still blames a guy that retired and not holding ANY elected office since the messiah decended from heaven to grace mankind with his smarts.
If he is what you all claim he is.....show us the proof to back it up and stop with the rhetoric.
Nope not getting sucked into your crazy tea bagger conspiracy. Besides I stopped believing him when he supported FISA.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:27 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
because people HAVE been arrested, charged, and are awaiting sentencing for trying to find that information out....
Hello again, smoothy, keeper of facts:
You complain about OTHERS shifting facts around to suit their agenda... DUDE!!
These people weren't arrested BECAUSE they investigated, like you SAID. They were arrested because of HOW they did it.
BIG DIFFERENCE! One is a FACT. One isn't.
excon
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:31 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by spitvenom
Nope not getting sucked into your crazy tea bagger conspiracy. Besides I stopped believing him when he supported FISA.
The Obama worshippers believe whatever the Messiah tells them to believe.
ANd incidentally... to stop something you may not be aware of...
Before you start calling someone a Teabagger... how would you like if I start asking how long you were into feltching?
It's a derogatory term that has NOTHING to do with a political affiliation.
Excon has had the courtesy of not using it since he was made aware of its meaning some time ago.
Teabaggers have NOTHING to do with the Tea Party or republicans in general, in fact most teabaggers are surprisingly enough... democrats. Since it refers to a specific GAY sexual act.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:33 AM
|
|
Sorry smoothy, I guess we assumed you enjoyed having a scrotum sac in your mouth, I guess we were wrong.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:37 AM
|
|
A gay term really? I guess my wife is gay. Thanks for letting me know.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:39 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
in fact most teabaggers are suprisingly enough....democrats. Since it refers to a specific GAY sexual act.
Odd thing to say considering how many "family values" republicans suddenly turn out to be gay. LOL!
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:43 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Odd thing to say considering how many "family values" republicans suddenly turn out to be gay. LOL!
You know how people bet on who will die next aka death pools. We should make a gay pool see what person come out of the closet next. I got my money on Beck.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:44 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by spitvenom
You know how people bet on who will die next aka death pools. We should make a gay pool see what person come out of the closet next. I got my money on Beck.
That sounds about right.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:44 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Sorry smoothy, I guess we assumed you enjoyed having a scrotum sac in your mouth, I guess we were wrong.
Very wrong... not my thing at all, by a longshot.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:45 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
That sounds about right.
I got my money on Obama... and second covering bet on Hillary.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:47 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Odd thing to say considering how many "family values" republicans suddenly turn out to be gay. LOL!
Far lower percentages than Democrats...
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:52 AM
|
|
I could careless if someone is gay. I just don't like it when people are against gay rights and then they come out and say they are gay. It is just sad.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:53 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by spitvenom
I could careless if someone is gay. I just don't like it when people are against gay rights and then they come out and say they are gay. It is just sad.
I couldn't care less if someone is gay too. However they are not a privileged class that is owed special rights and more than Mormons into Polygamy or NAMBLA is..
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:54 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
I could care less if someone is gay too. However they are not a privileged class that is owed special rights.
What can they do that you can't?
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:57 AM
|
|
Right now nothing I would want to do.
But they are trying to tell US what a marriage is even though it has been defined since the Old testimate of the Bible days.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 11:58 AM
|
|
So why do they have to follow a book that may or may not be true?
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2010, 12:00 PM
|
|
Who needs that old book anyway!
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Bias in custody hearings
[ 3 Answers ]
Judy you said:
I don't find the Courts to be biased against Defendants nor do I find the Courts to be biased against men. As far as this is "natural" because there are more deadbeat Dads I fail to see how this factors into your thinking. More deadbeat Dads = more male Defendants = bias. Not my...
Male dominated social structure & Modern science
[ 24 Answers ]
Why did male dominated social structure become more sustainable? Does modern science has any support? Why didn't female dominated social systems persist? What are the reasons other than social reasons?
Bias informatio
[ 5 Answers ]
Hey, I was just wondering, What is Bias?
I have googled but there explanations are so complex. If anyone can help thank you.
Media bias
[ 3 Answers ]
Dallas Morning News | News for Dallas, Texas | Texas/Southwest
Why do you think the mainstream media has downplayed this?
For example, on Google news, US it isn't on that page but if you search david morales- there are 845 articles??
View more questions
Search
|