Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    BABRAM's Avatar
    BABRAM Posts: 561, Reputation: 145
    Senior Member
     
    #21

    Jul 19, 2007, 04:17 PM
    "Mario3 disagrees: but the USA wont touch some of the worst dictators of the world. the usa doesnt care about SAudi Arabia who sentences people to death if they have aids."


    Mario,

    I said we went into to remove a tyrant dictator, not that we are were the world's police. Hussein was given warning after warning. Which way do you want it?



    Bobby
    Mario3's Avatar
    Mario3 Posts: 65, Reputation: 4
    -
     
    #22

    Jul 19, 2007, 07:21 PM
    Then why is the whole world so scared due to israel annoucning it has an atomic plan? No one is planning on destroying the entire civilization of the world but some nations have announced that they will bomb other nations with their atomic bomb and so far the only one is israel : (
    BABRAM's Avatar
    BABRAM Posts: 561, Reputation: 145
    Senior Member
     
    #23

    Jul 20, 2007, 05:58 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario3
    then why is the whole world so scared due to israel annoucning it has an atomic plan? no one is planning on destroying the entire civilization of the world but some nations have announced that they will bomb other nations with their atomic bomb and so far the only one is israel : (

    It's really simple! Israel promotes law abiding citizens and doesn't murder it's own people. Nations surrounding Israel have planned for Israel's destruction time and time again. Israel continues to have the freedom, right, and blessing of the U.S. (THANK G-D) to defend itself. Big big big difference between Iraq and Israel.:)


    Bobby
    CaptainRich's Avatar
    CaptainRich Posts: 4,492, Reputation: 537
    Cars & Trucks Expert
     
    #24

    Jul 20, 2007, 06:34 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario3
    it's sad that the USA is above all other countries of the world.
    If the US has, as a nation, perceived a threat to her sovereignty, where does it state that before we head off that threat, we need approval by nations that have little interest in fighting it and even less interest in providing significant help?

    The big white elephant in the middle of the room may be not that we want to instill a democratic government, so much as keep the radicals out of that government!

    We, and when I say "we," I'm probably talking about most everybody who lives in the modern world... we hold high the right to offer our interpretations of decisions made by people who are in a unique position to know and be aware of many things I probably don't want to be privy to. If you can't see all of the pieces of the puzzle, you can't sit at the table. It's like Monday morning quarterbacking. We look at what happened yesterday, or last year, and say I'd have done this or I'd have never done that... It's so easy. But I don't want to sit in that hot seat!
    Mario3's Avatar
    Mario3 Posts: 65, Reputation: 4
    -
     
    #25

    Jul 20, 2007, 06:44 AM
    Hahahahahahha they've just been honest and open about atomic bombing so lets all go to bed captainRich? No Iran even sent Bush and 8 page letter which on the CNN website (the transcript is there) and he said we should put war aside and stop this before people get hurt but the american government just really wanted war too much so bush disregarded it. Anyway war is on no matter what I guess, especially when no one has even said its wrong for israel to have atomic bombs... that's scary and very brutal of that regime
    CaptainRich's Avatar
    CaptainRich Posts: 4,492, Reputation: 537
    Cars & Trucks Expert
     
    #26

    Jul 20, 2007, 06:59 AM
    Who's atomic bombing? Who has Israel threatened to anilliate? No one. Seems to me they want to draw a line in the sand, a line that everyone involved agreed to in around 1948!

    And no matter if you admit it or not, Iran is highly and directly involved in the battles in Iraq. There not showing up as Iranian; nobody wears a uniform so they cannot be identified. Why do they wear scarves to hide their faces?

    And why should we trust Iranian government? I don't recall the UN telling Israel to discontinue nuclear research and development, but I do recall hearing them tell Iran to stop. Why? Because they're unstable. They seem to want to control the whole of the region, and, are you ready for this? The oil.

    The last thing we, or any other nation, needs or wants is to have them control the region or the oil.

    This is global. And not every nation on this planet can speak up. So we will step up and take down the bully, making it a better place for everybody.
    Mario3's Avatar
    Mario3 Posts: 65, Reputation: 4
    -
     
    #27

    Jul 20, 2007, 07:19 AM
    We should trust the iranian gvt more because they are one gvt that hasn't invaded another country in over 100 years. Are you that stupid? Do you read at all? And nuclear technology covers medication too... this not only about oil... but its about western countries wanting to ensure that they have a monopoly over medication... medication that every country can produce on their own... iran has more doctors in the united states - go walk in the your average american hospital... majority of doctors arnt white buddy. We're scared that some other countries want to get in on this market that we have a tight leashe over
    Mario3's Avatar
    Mario3 Posts: 65, Reputation: 4
    -
     
    #28

    Jul 20, 2007, 07:21 AM
    You know, more people were executed in Iran during the time that we glorified them and they were our allies. Since the new regime came in, less people have been put to death. There are more iranian women that are doctors than there are in america and canada. Their women ran the revolution... how come we never talk about these things and all we do is call them terrorists and make them out to be nothing but dust?
    Mario3's Avatar
    Mario3 Posts: 65, Reputation: 4
    -
     
    #29

    Jul 20, 2007, 07:21 AM
    I'm not saying their new regime is great, but I am saying that you are out of line and are being ignorant
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #30

    Jul 20, 2007, 07:26 AM
    Iran even sent Bush and 8 page letter which on the CNN website (the transcript is there) and he said we should put war aside and stop this before people get hurt but the american government just really wanted war too much so bush disregarded it
    Read the letter again . It is an invitation for President Bush to submit to Islam . One of the requirements before an attack is for a Muslim to invite conversion by the opponent. What you are reading from Ahmamadjihad is a declaration of war. A similar letter was sent to the King of Persia just before the army of Islam conquered it. The historical impications were not lost to either of them .

    Mr. President, according to divine verses, we have all been called upon to worship one God [Allah] and follow the teachings of the divine [Muslim] prophets. We increasingly see that people around the world are flocking toward a main focal point – that is the Almighty God. Undoubtedly through faith in God and the teachings of the prophets, the people will conquer their problems. My question for you is: "Do you not want to join them?"
    Special Reports - Letter of Iranian President Mamood Ahmadi-Najad to United President George W. Bush

    It is a matter of record that the Mahdi Hatter's goal is to use nuclear weapons to advance the spread of Islam, destroy Israel, hasten the return of the 12th Mahdi who disappeared or fell in a well in Qod , and bring about the glorious Islamic "End Days" .
    But first, the Koran requires that an infidel be invited to voluntarily submit to Islam before an attack is justified.

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said here Thursday that his letter to President George W. Bush did not concern the nuclear dossier, but rather was an invitation to Islam and the prophets culture.

    He made the above remarks in reply to a reporter while attending press conference on his letter to President Bush in Jakarta in the afternoon of the third day of his stay in Jakarta.

    Stressing that the letter was beyond the nuclear issue, the chief executive said that in principle, the country's nuclear case is not so significant to make him write a letter about it.

    "We act according to laws and our activities are quite clear. We are rather intent on solving more fundamental global matters.

    "The letter was an invitation to monotheism and justice, which are common to all divine prophets. If the call is responded positively, there will be no more problems to be solved," added the president.
    President says his letter to President Bush was invitation to Islam - Irna
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #31

    Jul 20, 2007, 07:35 AM
    Mario ;
    I spent a lot of time in Iran pre-revolution. Most of the people who lived then and are still alive today long for the good old days .

    I am actually torn about Iran . On the one hand I would like to see the popular revolution come that will sweep the Mullocracy out of power... and it could come soon. But their development of nuclear power is so insidious that the time for preventive action may be unavoidable . Nuclear power in a free society is not a problem . Nuclear power in the hands of a nut job like Ahamadjihad is intolerable .
    CaptainRich's Avatar
    CaptainRich Posts: 4,492, Reputation: 537
    Cars & Trucks Expert
     
    #32

    Jul 20, 2007, 07:42 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario3
    we should trust the iranian gvt more because they are one gvt that hasnt invaded another country in over 100 years.
    Nonsense! Just because they don't show up in uniform doesn't mean they don't have blood, US blood, on their hands!

    Quote Originally Posted by Mario3and nuclear technology covers medication too...
    Are you that stupid? do you read at all?
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario3
    i am saying that you are out of line and are being ignorant.
    Don't continue to be insulting. You only show your own lack of character when you do and that's not necessary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mario3
    and nuclear technology covers medication too...
    So when Iran says the want to wipe Israel off the map, what they really mean is they want to medicate them?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mario3
    medication that every country can produce on their own...
    Why reinvent the wheel? Can't we all just get along? Especially when it comes to health care? Nobody's going to argue that we have helped many countries, around the world, with their health care issues. Most of these countries couldn't do it by themselves. You've heard of the International Red Cross? The US contributes significantly to that endeavor!

    Quote Originally Posted by Mario3
    and they were our allies.
    The key is they were allies. I know. In the late seventies, I taught Faculty Development for the USAF. Many of the students in the classes were Iranian. But they have changed with every regime change. And they are no longer our allies.
    ETWolverine's Avatar
    ETWolverine Posts: 934, Reputation: 275
    Senior Member
     
    #33

    Jul 20, 2007, 07:45 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario3
    then why is the whole world so scared due to israel annoucning it has an atomic plan? No one is planning on destroying the entire civilization of the world but some nations have announced that they will bomb other nations with their atomic bomb and so far the only one is israel : (

    Again, Mario, you are full of baloney.

    "Our dear Imam (referring to Ayatollah Khomeini) said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement. We cannot compromise over the issue of Palestine."

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, World Without Zionism speech, October 2005

    "BLITZER: But should there be a state of Israel?
    Iranian Ambassador SOLTANIEH: I think I've already answered to you. If Israel is a synonym and will give the indication of Zionism mentality, no. "

    Interview with Wolf Blitzer, April 2006.

    I'd say that there have been pretty strong and credible threats from Iran regarding wiping Israel off the map if they get nukes.

    Furthermore, with regard to Israel "admitting they have nuclear weapons and threatening to use them", here is what actually happened.

    Israel Denies Policy Change After Olmert Nuclear Arms Hint

    December 12, 2006 -- Israeli officials are denying any change in policy after comments by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in which he appears to admit that Israel has nuclear weapons.

    In an interview with German television on December 11, Olmert said Iran has threatened to wipe Israel off the map and accused Tehran of trying to make nuclear weapons.

    Seeking to draw a distinction with Iran, Olmert listed Israel alongside nuclear powers the United States, France, and Russia.

    "Iran openly, explicitly, and publicly threatens to whip Israel off the map," Olmert said. "Can you say that this is the same level when they are aspiring to have nuclear weapons, as America, France, Israel, Russia?"

    An Israeli spokesman later said Olmert did not mean to say that Israel has nuclear weapons, but instead had meant to describe America, France, Israel, and Russia as democracies, in contrast to Iran, which the spokesman described as an "extremist theological regime."

    Israel is widely believed to have an arsenal of nuclear weapons, but has never confirmed or denied this.

    (compiled from agency reports)
    Copyright (c) 2006. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave. N.W. Washington DC 20036. RADIO FREE EUROPE / RADIO LIBERTY
    Now... does Israel have nuclear arms? Yes, I believe that they do. Do they have a nuclear option for Iran? Yes. But at no time has Israel threatened to use those weapons.

    So again, Mario, you are proven to be full of crap and have no idea what you are talking about.

    Elliot
    Mario3's Avatar
    Mario3 Posts: 65, Reputation: 4
    -
     
    #34

    Jul 20, 2007, 08:19 AM
    Hey I don't think what their leader had "said" is a reason to go and beat the hell out of their people! Just like what our own stupid bush says shouldn't be a reason to come and beat the hell out of our people. I think we should leave the children of iran, iraq and afghanistan alone. Sure people died in afghanistan... but more people just died because of us... there's got to be another answer. We funded the taliban and helped them come into power and we didn't mind that they tortured the f8ck out of women before, but as soon as they don't kiss our we step in and pretend to be heroes?
    CaptainRich's Avatar
    CaptainRich Posts: 4,492, Reputation: 537
    Cars & Trucks Expert
     
    #35

    Jul 20, 2007, 08:31 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario3
    hey i dont think what their leader had "said" is a reason to go and beat the hell out of their people! just like what our own stupid bush says shouldnt be a reason to come and beat the hell out of our people. i think we should leave the children of iran, iraq and afghanistan alone. sure people died in afghanistan ... but more people just died because of us...there's got to be another answer. we funded the taliban and helped them come into power and we didnt mind that they tortured the f8ck out of women before, but as soon as they dont kiss our we step in and pretend to be heros?
    You need to chill, Mario3

    From the AMHD (edited):

    Ask Me Help Desk insists that members abide by the rules and policies detailed below:

    3. Do not disparage any member publicly on the forums. If you state that you disagree with the answer of another member, please explain why politely.

    4. Do not post any comments that are obscene, vulgar, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

The road out of Iraq. [ 4 Answers ]

... goes through Tehran as tomder likes to say: So we find Iranian weapons, capture Iranians and Hezbollah in Iraq and all the drive-by media can say about it is "the accusations appear to be part of a continuing campaign by the US military to link Iran with insurgency violence in Iraq." Ya...

The Iraq Surge [ 11 Answers ]

I find it interesting that Harry Reid and company would make comments about how "the surge is a failure", that the military leadership is "incompetent" and that we should get out of Iraq, just as all this military progress is being made there. Comments from all comers are appreciated. Elliot

About the united Nations [ 2 Answers ]

Date countries met to discuss a peace organization?_________ place the countries met___________________________________?

United Nations [ 2 Answers ]

I want to do a degree in international relations, can I get a job in UN with such a degree? Which job markets I'm I likely to work in with such a degree?


View more questions Search