 |
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 11, 2013, 10:19 AM
|
|
What exactly is wrong with Bing ? I get the same info from that search engine that I get from Google.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 11, 2013, 10:32 AM
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 11, 2013, 10:43 AM
|
|
Yeah, so?
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 11, 2013, 10:46 AM
|
|
Ah, never mind. Keep using it.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 11, 2013, 12:52 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Ah, never mind. Keep using it.
Are we pretending Google doesn't also use sponsored ads or something? I happen to use an Android phone and an Android tablet, is that enough Google to satisfy you?
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 11, 2013, 02:09 PM
|
|
Yep, sure.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 12, 2013, 04:17 PM
|
|
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 16, 2013, 12:00 PM
|
|
Hello again,
Tea Partier Scottie Hughes, says,
Women Aborting Rapist’s Baby Should Serve Same Time As Rapist!
But I thought a woman's body had a way shutting these things down..
As my friend Steve would say, you can't make this stuff up.
Excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 07:51 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by excon
Hello again,
Tea Partier Scottie Hughes, says,But I thought a woman's body had a way shutting these things down..
As my friend Steve would say, you can't make this stuff up.
excon
Personally I think the question is nothing more than a trap because Roe is not ever going to be overturned. I mean heck, you people can't even acknowledge if there's ever a time too late to abort and have an aneurysm over any restriction at all, do you honestly thin it will be overturned and women will go to jail for having an abortion?
Anyway, the relevant point she made was missed, "to us it's a child." Haven't we murdered enough children?
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 08:42 AM
|
|
Obviously NOT, since you can kill a kid if you lose a fight and walk away with a bloody nose, and scraps and bumps.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 08:51 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Obviously NOT, since you can kill a kid if you lose a fight and walk away with a bloody nose, and scraps and bumps.
He was 17 (old enough to be charged as an adult in Texas), he was no angel and that's another thread. A child in the womb is defenseless.
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 08:55 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
A child in the womb is defenseless.
Let's do something to ensure that "child in the womb" doesn't even exist in the first place.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 09:00 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Let's do something to ensure that "child in the womb" doesn't even exist in the first place.
OK, how about abstinence?
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 09:02 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
OK, how about abstinence?
Yup, that's what most of us used to believe in. Now let's get the word out.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 09:05 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Yup, that's what most of us used to believe in. Now let's get the word out.
Um, I think we've been trying - too much resistance from the usual suspects.
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 09:06 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Um, I think we've been trying - to much resistance from the usual suspects.
Resistance where? Sounds like an excuse. Go grassroots.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 09:16 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
He was 17 (old enough to be charged as an adult in Texas), he was no angel and that's another thread. A child in the womb is defenseless.
Doesn't matter if a 17 year old kid was old enough to be charged as an adult, or was an angel or not, because he is dead and cannot answer to his "crime", nor defend himself because of the lousy judgment by an adult. This adult was no angel either.
We have already been over the helpless defenseless children in the womb, a very small number who are aborted beyond 12 weeks. But the methods to achieve the goal of NO abortions is vastly different.
On many subject I agree with the goal, but again your methods suck. But you guys are really lousy listeners when it comes to your own agendas. But I think soon now you will figure out listening and cooperating to achieve a better outcome is NOT pandering.
Until then, the people you piss off will push back in their own interest. They will stand their ground against conservative aggression.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 09:24 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Resistance where? Sounds like an excuse. Go grassroots.
Why should we have to go grassroots (which we do) while Planned Parenthood gets all manner of taxpayer funding to go mainstream and even set up shop in schools?
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 09:26 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Why should we have to go grassroots (which we do)
Where? Every stable Republican family should mentor an at-risk family.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 17, 2013, 09:41 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Doesn't matter if a 17 year old kid was old enough to be charged as an adult, or was an angel or not, because he is dead and cannot answer to his "crime", nor defend himself because of the lousy judgment by an adult. This adult was no angel either.
Never said Zimmerman was an angel or did the right thing, but it does matter because that was part of the media concocted narrative, that big 'ol "white" guy Zimmerman went after an innocent kid for wearing a hoody, not a 17 year old big enough to do some damage going after that "creepy a$$ cracka" - complete with this image:
That was NOT the Trayvon he encountered, but again that's another thread.
We have already been over the helpless defenseless children in the womb, a very small number who are aborted beyond 12 weeks. But the methods to achieve the goal of NO abortions is vastly different.
On many subject I agree with the goal, but again your methods suck. But you guys are really lousy listeners when it comes to your own agendas. But I think soon now you will figure out listening and cooperating to achieve a better outcome is NOT pandering.
Yep, we both want fewer abortions, fewer hungry people, fewer poor people but your side thinks that should be accomplished by enabling them to continue the behaviors that put them at risk, encourage dependence and excuse bad choices. Sorry, that's no road map to achieving a better outcome but you're right, people don't want to hear how to better themselves and take responsibility. They want their free contraceptives and Obama money.
Until then, the people you piss off will push back in their own interest. They will stand their ground against conservative aggression.
Hey, I don't blame people for resisting taking responsibility for themselves when they've got you to nanny and coddle them in your 'wussified' America.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
The war on women
[ 1516 Answers ]
Hello:
We've had post after post about this alleged war on women. The right wing says, what war? There's nothing going on here. Look over there. Then they accuse the Democrats of pitting women against men. They just want to talk about jobs...
But, even after those discussion, the war on...
The war on women round II
[ 20 Answers ]
U.S. drops the ball on women's rights - CNN.com
It seems the US is indeed conducting a war on women which places it in the same league as the restrictive society of Iran, and why, because instead of acknowledging gains endorsed by most of the world, it is a hold out for some utopian view, what...
Obama's war on women
[ 18 Answers ]
Why does Obama hate women?
Add to that the fact that Obama doesn't care about real life issues women are facing such as gas and grocery prices instead of $9.00 contraceptives, and I'd say Obama is the one waging a war on women, not Republicans.
View more questions
Search
|