 |
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Mar 16, 2013, 07:39 AM
|
|
Hello again,
Tort reform is PERFECT for right wingers... It TAKES away rights, and doesn't fix the problem. Right wingers HATE rights, unless it's their 2nd Amendment rights...
What tort reform IS, in the final analysis, is PRICE CONTROLS - a very LIBERAL idea. I thought the right wing LIKED the free market. Instead, tort reform sets a LIMIT on how much money a VICTIM can receive, no matter HOW badly they were injured... That's price controls no matter how you slice it.
Now, everybody who lives on EARTH knows, that when THEY'RE injured or their child is injured, they'll change their tune. Look at Rob Portman - A STAUNCH defender of DOMA until something happened to HIS family.
FIXING our health care problems on the backs of INJURED people AIN'T going to work. To think it would is mean spirited, un American, short sighted, and won't work anyway.
excon
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Mar 16, 2013, 08:21 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
I have also called for tort reform on these pages years back. That wasn't the question you asked. You asked, "You didn't give a rats patoot before Obama was elected?"
I answered what you asked. Try and keep up.
Tort reform doesn't stop your premiums from rising, but having the insurance companies return some of the money they didn't use for health care related expenses does and will.
I guess eliminating caps on coverage, and pre existing conditions doesn't help either. Or tax deductions for premiums that rise as the premiums rise was a lousy thing for consumers too.
My drug costs have come down the last year and so has my mom's on medicare. No more donut hole extra payments. That's a bad thing too huh?
Caught up yet?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 16, 2013, 11:46 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Tort reform doesn't stop your premiums from rising, but having the insurance companies return some of the money they didn't use for health care related expenses does and will.
In other words, profits and investing are evil. If you had the same attitude about government we might get somewhere. Government takes and takes and takes to feed its voracious appetite and you guys b!tch about an insignificant cut in spending increases.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Mar 16, 2013, 12:32 PM
|
|
Profits on the backs of the poor are evil, just ask the new pope. If you had the same concerns about businesses and corporations that take and take from the consumer as you do the government, which could be more efficient, we could get somewhere.
|
|
 |
Pest Control Expert
|
|
Mar 16, 2013, 01:25 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
... the government, which could be more efficient,
BWAHAHAHahahahahahah!!
Governments don't do efficient, ever. Have you never heard the old chestnut about an elephant being a mouse built to government specifications?
Governments (any of them) can SOMETIMES be more effective than private endeavors, but not more efficient.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 16, 2013, 02:46 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Profits on the backs of the poor are evil, just ask the new pope. If you had the same concerns about businesses and corporations that take and take from the consumer as you do the government, which could be more efficient, we could get somewhere.
Could be more efficient is an understatement.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Mar 16, 2013, 03:00 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Could be more efficient is an understatement.
I know! Finally we agree on a point. Watch out world!!
 Originally Posted by Catsmine
BWAHAHAHahahahahahah !!!!!!
Governments don't do efficient, ever. Have you never heard the old chestnut about an elephant being a mouse built to government specifications?
Governments (any of them) can SOMETIMES be more effective than private endeavors, but not more efficient.
You may be right, so lets beat both their a$$e$ until they do what we want!!
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 17, 2013, 01:57 PM
|
|
Tort reform was only one of my plans. One of the others that I have mentioned here before is Direct primary care(DPC) for the vast majority of health care needs ,and having insurance cover only catastrophic care.
Direct primary care - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 17, 2013, 02:25 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
Well Tom you are getting closer but such a system doesn't solve the real problem, which is, where do you go when you don't have the money
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 17, 2013, 02:38 PM
|
|
There are already government programs to care for the poor. There are already charitable organizations to handle the heath care needs of the poor.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 17, 2013, 03:22 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
there are already government programs to care for the poor. there are already charitable organizations to handle the heath care needs of the poor.
I don't think you have any idea about how many poor, that is, those unable to afford medical care there are, It isn't just the jobless, the unemployed, those on welfare, but poorly paid workers also
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 17, 2013, 04:06 PM
|
|
Yeah it sucks being poor.
Maybe we can seize everyone's bank accounts like the EU is doing to Cyprus ,so we can spread the wealth.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 17, 2013, 06:30 PM
|
|
I think you miss the point of why that is being done, the Russians are using that country to launder money
And yes Tom it sucks being poor because the poor are more likely to need medical help and be less able to pay for it
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 18, 2013, 02:57 AM
|
|
But I already said there are provisions for the poor. That is not the problem. The real problem is that too many sheeple are used to suckling on the nanny-state teet.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 18, 2013, 03:34 AM
|
|
You don't have nanny state, Tom
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 18, 2013, 06:36 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
yeah it sucks being poor.
maybe we can seize everyone's bank accounts like the EU is doing to Cyprus ,so we can spread the wealth.
I wonder how much money is left in Cypriot banks today?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 18, 2013, 06:41 AM
|
|
I know there was a run on the ATMs . Clete is wrong about Cyprus . It is the canary in the coal mine. If the EU gets away with it there ,then the PIGS are next . And then... (I see my 401-K threatened again)
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 18, 2013, 11:16 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by excon
Now, everybody who lives on EARTH knows, that when THEY'RE injured or their child is injured, they'll change their tune. Look at Rob Portman - A STAUNCH defender of DOMA until something happened to HIS family.
He's just evolving like Obama, Bill and now Hillary.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Mar 18, 2013, 01:34 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
He's just evolving like Obama, Bill and now Hillary.
Do you tell your gay friends that you haven't evolved yet? Do you even have any? Would you go to your best gay friends wedding?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 18, 2013, 01:50 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Do you tell your gay friends that you haven't evolved yet? Do you even have any? Would you go to your best gay friends wedding?
Nice gotcha questions. The question you should be asking is why are Obama and the Clintoons pretending to endorse gay marriage to advance their political aspirations? Clinton signed DOMA, Obama was publicly against gay marriage until the last election and Hillary telegraphed her likely evolution months ago:
But according to two sources, Clinton’s aides have privately indicated to people that she will end up where her husband and daughter, Chelsea, have emerged on the issue – in favor of same-sex nuptials.
Her circle has “indicated privately that she feels like … because of her role as the country’s chief diplomat that it was appropriate for her to stay out of this” over the last two years, said one source, who added that the message was also that as soon as she’s left Foggy Bottom “and she’s given the right opportunity, that she will end up with the rest of her clan.”
Yes, that sounds like the perfect time to have been convinced by your hubby and daughter to "emerge."
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Obamacare For The Poor
[ 18 Answers ]
What happens in 2014. Women 60 years old is unemployed and has a preexisting condition. Has been denied medicaid in Florida, she did not met the current guild-lines. Only income is from her husband's social security check.
I wonder what will happen in this type of situation??
Obamacare...
[ 6 Answers ]
What exactly does it mean? I've heard different things from different people and don't know what to believe...
Obamacare's unconstitutional
[ 17 Answers ]
That's what U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson said today. He said the mandate requiring people to have medical insurance exceeds all constitutional "logical limitations ".
Judge in Va. strikes down federal health care law - Yahoo! News
If one part of Obamacare goes down then the whole law...
Alternatives to Obamacare;
[ 178 Answers ]
Obamacare, whatever that may be, is unpopular, not cost effective , and offensive to the people it is to care for and from whom paid taxes into this.
It is time to move on and look at alternatives to Obamacare and the CURRENT healthcare system we have in place. The ultimate goal being to provide...
Obamacare, good enough for thee -
[ 8 Answers ]
But not for Obama himself...
During Obama's ratings flop of an infomercial last night, he refused to promise that he would stay within his own health care system if one of his wife or daughters were sick.
There you have it, if the president himself won't commit to trusting his own...
View more questions
Search
|