 |
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 07:08 AM
|
|
Hello again, Steve:
We BOTH want him to get the nomination, don't we?
excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 07:27 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by excon
Hello again, Steve:
We BOTH want him to get the nomination, don't we?
excon
I'm not picking anyone yet, but I'm loving the show so far. There's nothing to worry about right, what's to fear about a one term senator who's done nothing possibly being the leader of the country?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 07:34 AM
|
|
The bar has been set . Scott Brown is hangin in Iowa too.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 07:41 AM
|
|
Hello again,
So, if Obama fails because he's a rookie, you're going to bring in your own rookie... THAT'S a good plan..
excon
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 07:44 AM
|
|
Yeah bring in your rookie!!
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 07:48 AM
|
|
Michael Jordon was a rookie once...
And some rookies like Obama choke when the spotlight hits them and they have to perform rather than talk.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 07:50 AM
|
|
Rookie ? The emperor didn't stay in the league long enough to qualify as a rookie.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 07:56 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
rookie ? the emperor didn't stay in the league long enough to qualify as a rookie.
True... all he did was talk about playing ball... he never actually played a game that mattered. And it shows.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 02:41 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by paraclete
Tom it is obvious we had a vast sea in the inland too, I have travelled across gibber plain, ancient sea bed. But what this tells us is that things change over time so I agree change is normal. It is not Krakotoa and similar we get those every century somewhere but the supervolcanoes in Yellowstone and Rotarua that change the climate for centuries, millennia and we are overdue for such an eruption. I am concerned that they might exist where we know nothing about them. We are five volcanoes away from nuclear winter at any time
or it could be heat from below .
The Greenland ice sheet is melting from below, caused by a high heat flow from the mantle into the lithosphere. This influence is very variable spatially and has its origin in an exceptionally thin lithosphere. Consequently, there is an increased heat flow from the mantle and a complex interplay between this geothermal heating and the Greenland ice sheet. The international research initiative IceGeoHeat led by the GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences establishes in the current online issue of Nature Geoscience (Vol 6, August 11, 2013) that this effect cannot be neglected when modeling the ice sheet as part of a climate study.
Heat flow from Earth's mantle contributes to Greenland ice melting
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 06:08 PM
|
|
Tom I have long said that CO2 is not the sole contributor in fact human activity only accounts for about 20%, irrespective of what the wankers at the UN think, this is why temperature rises have flattened and their models don't work, but I don't subscribe entirely to the heat from below theory, where was all this heat during the ice ages. We need to get back to planting trees not cutting them down and stop thinking about them as a sustainable resource
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 06:30 PM
|
|
Polluting the air, land, and water has no effect on the environment, or the people animals and insects in it? That's the dumbest thing I ever heard.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 07:46 PM
|
|
CO2 as a pollutant is the dumbest thing I have ever heard
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 08:57 PM
|
|
Who is the arbiteur of what is the natural balance? Just because we have a level at this moment doesn't make it the natural balance, just a balance at this point in time because this is what we observe
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 09:05 PM
|
|
Deleted
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 20, 2013, 11:26 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Deleted
I suspect your response was unprintable
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 21, 2013, 03:27 AM
|
|
where was all this heat during the ice ages. We need to get back to planting trees not cutting them down and stop thinking about them as a sustainable resource
Well I already explained my pet hypothesis that the natural state of the planet is warm with a higher concentration of carbon in the atmosphere. Before the ice ages there were tropical forests at the North Poll. Fossil records prove that. This was during the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum . This was probably assisted by a heat from below event... either that or the dinosaurs were driving SUVs and blowing garbage into the air via smoke stacks .
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Aug 21, 2013, 04:36 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
Well I already explained my pet hypothesis that the natural state of the planet is warm with a higher concentration of carbon in the atmosphere. Before the ice ages there were tropical forests at the North Poll. Fossil records prove that. This was during the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum . This was probably assisted by a heat from below event ......either that or the dinosaurs were driving SUVs and blowing garbage into the air via smoke stacks .
Yes, but just because the natural state of the environment back then was high levels of CO2 doesn't provide justification for artificially creating high levels of CO2 now.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 21, 2013, 05:05 AM
|
|
So what's the justification for all the doom and gloom hysteria of the impending man-made climate apocalypse even though the "settled science" keeps coming up short?
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Aug 21, 2013, 05:11 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
So what's the justification for all the doom and gloom hysteria of the impending man-made climate apocalypse even though the "settled science" keeps coming up short?
No gloom and doom on my part. My only concern was that the southern oceans are becoming a carbon sink for CO2. However, that wasn't the point I was making to Tom. I was suggesting that his theory is an example of affirming the consequence.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Right wing moving FURTHER right
[ 187 Answers ]
Hello:
Some of our right wing friends think the way to win elections is to move FURTHER to the right. But, my question to them is, how many right wingers are out there, who AREN'T already voting with you?
Now, I don't know about politics, much.. But, I think doing that will spell the END of...
Right Wing Insanity
[ 187 Answers ]
Hello:
A while back I heard that the candidate for governor of Florida was advocating drug testing for welfare recipients... I laughed and laughed and laughed... THAT stuff doesn't happen in THIS country... We have a Constitution, for crying out loud.. That guy will NEVER get elected... And,...
Limitations if you get a fixed-wing cert. then go for a rotary-wing?
[ 0 Answers ]
Are there limitations if you first get a fixed-wing certification and then go for a rotary-wing certification? Son wants to go into avaition, spefically helicopters, but none of our state schools have the fixed-wing certifications in conjunction with a degree in avaition. Is there a limitation if...
The Right Wing
[ 32 Answers ]
Hello:
I'm confused. I HOPE you can help - cause then we can get down to it. But, I have a hard time arguing with clouds... I'll TRY to be specific, because I don't want to be accused of being a cloud myself...
Arguing with smoothy is like arguing with a cloud. There's NOTHING to it. ...
Left Wing/Right Wing Or How About A Drumstick?
[ 10 Answers ]
I've been following some of the political threads with some interest...
Just wondering where some of the regulars see themselves on the ol' political spectrum.
Left Wing, Right Wing or planted firmly in the Center, I'd like to know where you see yourself fitting in and perhaps an anecdotal...
View more questions
Search
|