[tomder55]

There is no/or at least rare caller ID for cell phones. (Call me on your cell, and I will tell you what shows up.) "Sexologist Dr. Jill McDevitt hosted the session where around 55 students used their cellphones to answer questions about sex. The results were then published in real time on a screen."

You should see her credentials.. She's a sexologist like a madam is . Here is the good professor .


And here is her business poster .


Get it ? Get your heart on

And here is the good professor's office where students can come for more a more personal education experience .


So let's dispense with the nonsense that what this "professor " is teaching is legitimate .

[Wondergirl]

this "professor"

She isn't a professor at Yale (or any university). She has her own business.

You want women to be dumb about their bodies?

You want her to be ugly?

[tomder55]

No ;obviously she is dressing appropriate for her profession... I was not commenting on her "looks " .

[speechlesstx]

She isn't a professor at Yale. She has her own business.

I never said she was a professor "at Yale," did tom? She IS a professor and the SEMINAR/WORKSHOP was intended to TEACH sensitivity to TABOO sex. Can we end this charade that it was otherwise?

[speechlesstx]

no ;obviously she is dressing appropriate for her profession...I was not commenting on her "looks " .

I'm sure her mother is proud.

[Wondergirl]

I never said she was a professor "at Yale," did tom? She IS a professor and the SEMINAR/WORKSHOP was intended to TEACH sensitivity to TABOO sex. Can we end this charade that it was otherwise?

Why are you being so obstinate? I had added "(or any university)." You can have a Ph.D. and not be a teacher. She is a researcher. And that wasn't the purpose of the seminar, to "teach" about sex! Read the link that someone (you?) posted.

[Wondergirl]

I'm sure her mother is proud.

And is probably driving an expensive car given to her by her daughter.

[speechlesstx]

Why are you being so obstinate? I had added "(or any university)." You can have a Ph.D. and not be a teacher. She is a researcher.

I'm not the one being obstinate. That she isn't presently employed as a professor at Yale or any other university is irrelevant to the point made, it's just a distraction.

And that wasn't the purpose of the seminar, to "teach" about sex! Read the link that someone (you?) posted.

Tom linked to it and I've posted the quote on the purpose of the seminar in the words of the "event director" twice and you still deny it?? Good Lord woman... what part of "teach students" and "taboo and even illegal sex acts" are you misunderstanding? For a librarian you sure seem to have trouble with words.

Event director Giuliana Berry told CampusReform.org that the workshop was supposed to teach students to respond with “understanding” and “compassion” to taboo and even illegal sex acts.

[Wondergirl]

I'm not the one being obstinate. That she isn't presently employed as a professor at Yale or any other university is irrelevant to the point made, it's just a distraction.

She is making gobs of money as a businesswoman. Why on earth would she want to get the pathetic pay a teacher gets?

For a librarian you sure seem to have trouble with words.

Ah, the putdown.

[paraclete]

I'm lost, what does any of this have to do with food wars

[Wondergirl]

I'm lost, what does any of this have to do with food wars

Food for the soul.

[speechlesstx]

Ah, the putdown.

What do you expect from someone as "obstinate" about the facts as me?

[Wondergirl]

What do you expect from someone as "obstinate" about the facts as me?

That's not a putdown. Had I called you a -----, that would have been a putdown.

[tomder55]

Good for her.. My critique is with Yale allowing her "seminar "on campus . It's a nice gimmick.. a trick with cell phones that she pretends is research.
I just heard a podcast of the interview that Smoothy was mentioning .
When pressed about her opinions about the appropriateness of bestiality and incents ;she refused to comment . If she was really teaching ,perhaps she could've said it's sick and twisted and inappropriate criminal behavior . Instead she hung up.

[Tuttyd]

That only proves they attended. Lots of conservatives attend universities but their ideas and point of view are typically not welcome and in fact, the schools are often quite openly hostile toward conservatives (while pretending to welcome diversity of course).

Also In fact as I've posted twice now, Harvard Law School's paper penned an op-ed telling them not to apply there should you someday have the gall to criticize them.

Warning: Do Not Enroll

Now go ahead and give us your "why is it conservatives are powerless to change them" routine.

The article is not saying this. The article says (correctly or incorrectly) that Harvard doesn't cater for extreme left or right ideologies.

The author is saying that you should not enroll at Harvard with the intent of gaining a political career AND then using you political position to demonize Harvard for political points.

In other words, doing similar to what is happening here at the moment.

[paraclete]

At the risk of repeating myself (another post disappered) what has any of this to do with food?

[speechlesstx]

The article is not saying this. The article says (correctly or incorrectly) that Harvard doesn't cater for extreme left or right ideologies.

The author is saying that you should not enroll at Harvard with the intent of gaining a political career AND then using you political position to demonize Harvard for political points.

In other words, doing similar to what is happening here at the moment.

I get the point of the column, it's an opinion an institute of higher learning should avoid. It's supposed to be an institution that welcomes a diversity of views and accepts the good and bad without being so thin skinned.

I doubt seriously any of them enrolled "with the intent of gaining a political career AND then using" their "political position to demonize Harvard for political points." I'm reasonably certain they went there to get an education, wouldn't you agree?

[speechlesstx]

That's not a putdown. Had I called you a -----, that would have been a putdown.

And I was merely making an observation, supported by the evidence.

[Tuttyd]

I get the point of the column, it's an opinion an institute of higher learning should avoid. It's supposed to be an institution that welcomes a diversity of views and accepts the good and bad without being so thin skinned.

I doubt seriously any of them enrolled "with the intent of gaining a political career AND then using" their "political position to demonize Harvard for political points." I'm reasonably certain they went there to get an education, wouldn't you agree?

What you are saying here may well be true. However, my point is that the article in questions doesn't provide evidence for your position.

Tut

[speechlesstx]

What you are saying here may well be true. However, my point is that the article in questions doesn't provide evidence for your position.

Tut

It was not meant to be a definitive proof, but the attitude most certainly supports my position.