[Allheart]

Hello again, All:

I'm unable to do that. Life stuff is always front and center.

In fact, I wonder if you could remove all that "religious" stuff from your thoughts..... would science remain?

excon

Hi Ex,

Good point and I hope you don't think I was directing you what to do. I just find things easier to understand when I turn off life, which I can not understand at all.

But if I shut off my religion stuff... would science remain? No, only because, I respect science meaning I believe it has a huge purpose and I respect scientist, but I don't understand it much, but do respect it.

Truth? If I turned off my religious thoughts, I would think, what's the purpose of even being here. To me, I see nothing but struggle, heartache. But then a see a child smile and back come my religious thoughts.

Does any of that make sense.

Ex, hope you know I wasn't be smart or anything, K?

[NeedKarma]

Truth? If I turned off my religious thoughts, I would think, what's the purpose of even being here. To me, I see nothing but struggle, heartache.

I think that's probably the biggest difference right there between yourself and us who don't have a need for religion. We do not see only struggle and heartache, we are more optimistic I guess. Plus, if I may speak for myself, how can keep thinking about struggle and heartache went I have my kids, my wife, my job, my house, road trips, sports, etc. to occupy my time.

It is possible that you have had a hard life and I'm sorry for that but you can't attribute your 'coping mechanism' to the rest of us - you've found what works for you, we have what works for us.

[Allheart]

I think that's probably the biggest difference right there between yourself and us who don't have a need for religion. We do not see only struggle and heartache, we are more optimistic I guess. Plus, if I may speak for myself, how can keep thinking about struggle and heartache went I have my kids, my wife, my job, my house, road trips, sports, etc. to occupy my time.

It is possible that you have had a hard life and I'm sorry for that but you can't attribute your 'coping mechanism' to the rest of us - you've found what works for you, we have what works for us.

Oh NK I understand what you are saying. And I am grateful for the beatufiul things in my life more then you will ever know. I could never say I had a hard life... ever... when I see starvation.. and all the other hardships.

That's what I mean about struggle. From people starving, seeing their heartaches, hearing they have cancer... to just have a disagreement with someone.

There are beautiful things in life that I hold precious... but I also see pain and heartache and lots of it.

I just can't find complete joy with all that going on.

NK I am more blessed then I could ever relay and wonder every day why? I have been told I am too optimstic but that's what I mean about struggle.

For me, God's love helps to lighten the load of what I see and gives me the strength to somehow change.

In all painful things of this life - I see God's love. Have you ever seen a special child (down syndrome or something similar?) smile, I light up inside because in that smile I see God's love.

[excon]

I just find things easier to understand when I turn off life, which I can not understand at all………… There are beautiful things in life that I hold precious....but I also see pain and heartache and lots of it.

Hello again, All:

Now we're getting somewhere.

I don't understand life either. But, I understand our nature. What you see as good and evil, I see as the natural acts of man.

Lest you think that leaves me depressed, however, you are wrong. I'm quite optimistic about our future.

Man has outlived (evolved if you will) beyond his need to act tribally, which is the way we've ALWAYS acted. The speed of technology has far outpaced the speed of evolution. But, I'll bet evolution is just going to speed up too, though.

Therefore, our species will adapt/adjust/morph/evolve into one that's better able to survive in a technological age, rather than a tribal age. We DO think like tribes, don't we?? Oh, we look very cool in our three piece suites, but we're barely a generation or two out of the jungle. That's a minuscule amount of time to observe evolution at work. Evolution hasn't caught up.

But we will survive, or we'll wind up in the dustbins of history with the millions of other species that didn't pan out.

excon

[Allheart]

Hello again, All:

Now we're getting somewhere.

I don't understand life either. But, I understand our nature. What you see as good and evil, I see as the natural acts of man.

Lest you think that leaves me depressed, you are wrong. I'm quite optimistic about our future.

Man has outlived (evolved if you will) beyond his need to act tribally, which is the way we've ALWAYS acted. The speed of technology has far outpaced the speed of evolution. But, I'll bet evolution is just gonna speed up too, though.

Therefore, our species will adapt/adjust/morph/evolve into one that's better able to survive in a technological age, rather than a tribal age. We DO think like tribes, don't we???? Oh, we look very cool in our three piece suites, but we're barely a generation or two out of the jungle. That's a miniscule amount of time to observe evolution at work. Our culture hasn't caught up.

But we will survive, or we'll wind up in the dustbins of history with the millions of other species that didn't pan out.

excon

Ex - I just think you are such a special and precious man and hope you don't mind me saying that or I embarrass you - I don't mean to.

I completely understand what you are saying and no we really are not that very far removed from hunt or be hunted - but I have hope to that we are better then that.

I don't necessarily see "evil" so much - I see far more good and mostly all good. Rarely do I see evil. I see struggle. The only time I would say I see evil, is when someone is so disturbed there is no way back for them. Where they are brilliant and of sound mind - but evil has pentrated them so much that all they want to do is cause harm merely for the sake of causing harm.

[De Maria]

Why are we still expecting things to have to evolve by chance? I've said over and over that evolution doesnt work by chance, any source who says so obviously doesn't understand evolution or it's mechanisms.

Furthermore are you really expecting full detailed explanations of morphologies etc in a popular science article? The evidence is recent and i'm sure many scientists will study it further and explain how it evolved in the future. Science is an ongoing thing. We don't have all the answers right now.

If it isn't by chance, its by design.

By chance (adv)

Synonyms: accidentally, by accident, unintentionally, inadvertently, coincidentally, unexpectedly, by luck, fortuitously, by coincidence, by a quirk of fate

Antonym: on purpose
Synonym for by chance (adv) - antonym for by chance (adv) - Thesaurus - MSN Encarta


Antonyms: chance

Adj

Definition: accidental, unforeseeable
Antonyms: designed, foreseeable, planned, understood
chance: Definition, Synonyms and Much More from Answers.com

[michealb]

If it isn't by chance, its by design.

No, it's by selection. Which is nether chance or design. The selection is done by who ever survives to reproduce hence "survival of the fittest".

[De Maria]

No, it's by selection.

You are using "selection" as a synonym for "survival". In other words, since it is "left behind" after the others have died, then it has been "selected" or "chosen" for survival. This is what is more commonly called "natural" selection. But natural selection is the result of so called "random" mutations in the genes which permit some individual specimens to overcome the changes in the environment while others don't. These individuals then pass on their genetic mutations and they become the norm.

Now tell me, who rolled the dice? In other words, who put these variations in the genetic code so that they might appear as mutations when they were needed?

Who wrote the genetic code in the first place? A code implies intelligence, communication, language and design.

Which is nether chance or design.

It is design. Are you familiar at all with programming? Have you ever heard of an "if" statement? What does it do?

The surviving individuals are the "if" statements of nature.

The selection is done by who ever survives to reproduce hence "survival of the fittest".

Correct. But that selection was made by an intelligence.

Sincerely,

De Maria

[NeedKarma]

It is design. Are you familiar at all with programming? Have you ever heard of an "if" statement?

So it is your contention that your god programs all the DNA in every cell of every living thing?

[Capuchin]

So it is your contention that your god programs all the DNA in every cell of every living thing?

He must use a mac.

[Fr_Chuck]

So it is your contention that your god programs all the DNA in every cell of every living thing?

Not only programs it, but created it to start with.

[NeedKarma]

not only programs it, but created it to start with.

Busy guy, no wonder he has no time to heal amputees.

[Synnen]

No wonder he has no time to answer prayers and grant miracles.

He's too busy chasing down bugs and eliminating them.

God as a Dev/GM in an online game makes it soooooo much easier to understand!

No time for the average player, just the ones that scream and whine for his attention, the "bugs" that are fixed are random, based on what He feels like working on, or on what people are demanding the most, every now and again someone figures out an "exploit" that God scrambles to fix, only in fixing it, He screws up 17 other things that generally leaves most of the game's community unhappy with his customer service, and they report him to the OTHER "devs" (the other gods) who can't do anything about what HE is doing, but they fix the problems those players come to them with, so even though they're "lesser" devs, they have a large following because they do what they can to fix the things the main dev has screwed up.

All we need now is God announcing that he's selling out to Sony, who can better handle the customer service complaints and distribution.

[De Maria]

So it is your contention that your god programs all the DNA in every cell of every living thing?

Yes. If you've ever looked at and considered a DNA strand, the order and design which it reveals leaves no question that an Intelligence designed it.

[NeedKarma]

Nah, that's not my belief. Sorry.

[nicki143]

I think more why do you believe in god a book that was written thousands of years ago.

[michealb]

You are using "selection" as a synonym for "survival". In other words, since it is "left behind" after the others have died, then it has been "selected" or "chosen" for survival. This is what is more commonly called "natural" selection. But natural selection is the result of so called "random" mutations in the genes which permit some individual specimens to overcome the changes in the environment while others don't. These individuals then pass on their genetic mutations and they become the norm.

Now tell me, who rolled the dice? In other words, who put these variations in the genetic code so that they might appear as mutations when they were needed?

I think you might actually believe in evolution De Maria you just don't know it, yet.

I think we just need to define mutations a little and I think you'll have it. How the mutations come across is because a copy is being made. No creature is able to replicate its self with 100% accuracy because if it could it would be perfect and only god is perfect right. So when a creature replicates its self there are minor changes some good, some bad. The bad ones don't reproduce the good ones do "survival of the fittest". Now that is all evolution states if you want to say that it's all gods plan that's fine but as long as you get that the good genes get passes on because of survival and the genes change because of mutation(coping errors) that is evolution.

[De Maria]

I think you might actually believe in evolution De Maria you just don't know it, yet.

I'm Catholic. I believe in evolution by God's design.

Evolution and the Pope

To paraphrase Santayana: Newspapers ignorant of history are condemned to reprint it. How else should we interpret the recent headline, describing Pope John Paul II's address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, "Pope Says Evolution Compatible with Faith"?

There's not much "news" there. Fifty years ago Pope Pius XII said almost the same thing in the encyclical Humani generis: "The Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, insofar as it inquiries into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter."

While not exactly canonizing Darwin, Pius XII did imply that the theory of evolution isn't necessarily inimical to Christianity. Certainly he didn't reject evolution altogether. How then do we explain the big headlines when John Paul II says basically the same thing in 1996? ....
Article: EVOLUTION AND THE POPE

I think we just need to define mutations a little and I think you'll have it. How the mutations come across is because a copy is being made. No creature is able to replicate its self with 100% accuracy because if it could it would be perfect and only god is perfect right. So when a creature replicates its self there are minor changes some good, some bad. The bad ones don't reproduce the good ones do "survival of the fittest". Now that is all evolution states if you want to say that it's all gods plan that's fine but as long as you get that the good genes get passes on because of survival and the genes change because of mutation(coping errors) that is evolution.

Thanks Michealb. Because you have just permitted me to say what has seemed to twist everyone else's panties into knots. You said, "...if you want to say that it's all gods plan thats fine...".

That's EXACTLY WHAT I WANT TO SAY.

Thanks. Sounds like you and I have come to understanding.

You see, for us, Christians, science is a means by which we come to understand God's universe. But secular scientists have written God off and they accuse anyone who believes in God of being anti-reason. But that is far from the truth.

Sincerely,

De Maria

[inthebox]

I think you might actually believe in evolution De Maria you just don't know it, yet.

I think we just need to define mutations a little and I think you'll have it. How the mutations come across is because a copy is being made. No creature is able to replicate its self with 100% accuracy because if it could it would be perfect and only god is perfect right. So when a creature replicates its self there are minor changes some good, some bad. The bad ones don't reproduce the good ones do "survival of the fittest". Now that is all evolution states if you want to say that it's all gods plan thats fine but as long as you get that the good genes get passes on because of survival and the genes change because of mutation(coping errors) that is evolution.

Okay - what mutaions led to the development of the eye,
Flight in birds
Bipedalism in humans
Echolocation in bats
From invertebrates to vertebrates
Exo vs endo skeletons
etc..
These cannot be "proved" or "tested"





Mutations are responsible for:

Cystic fibrosis
Sickle cell
Huntington's
Tay sachs
Breast cancer [ brca 1 ]
Certain post chemo leukemias
Muscular dystrophy
Certain types of alzheimer's
Crohn's [ nod 2 ]
Some forms of colon cancer

The list of medical diseases caused or associated with or a increased risk for
By gene mutations grows every year, but this is the process by which we are to have developed from a single cell? Remember selection cannot work if there are no mutations.

[Capuchin]

Okay - what mutaions led to the development of the eye,
flight in birds
bipedalism in humans
echolocation in bats
from invertebrates to vertebrates
exo vs endo skeletons
etc..
these cannot be "proved" or "tested"

Of course they can, we see the eye in many stages of development in creatures that are alive today. - It's outlined in the origin of species. And, shock horror, God gave octopi better eyes that he gave us, maybe he loves octopi more.
I don't have time to go over all of these. Try reading a book.

mutations are responsible for:

cystic fibrosis
sickle cell
huntington's
Tay sachs
breast cancer [ brca 1 ]
certain post chemo leukemias
muscular dystrophy
certain types of alzheimer's
Crohn's [ nod 2 ]
some forms of colon cancer

the list of medical diseases caused or associated with or a increased risk for
by gene mutations grows every year, but this is the process by which we are to have developed from a single cell? Remember selection cannot work if there are no mutations.

Yes. It is. You ignore the mutations that let people run 100m in under 10 seconds, that let them hold their breath longer underwater, that give them resistance to developing cancer, that stop them from developing AIDS etc etc etc.

Taking cystic fibrosis as an example - these people would die at birth outside of our society. They would be unable to procreate.