 |
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 07:40 AM
|
|
Is there actually a solution to this?
Sunday will be my final word then.
I don't see anything else. Wednesday was a mistake I did. I didn't really mean it at first and forgot Saturday >.<
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 07:41 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Unknown008
Is there actually a solution to this?
Sunday will be my final word then.
I don't see anything else. Wednesday was a mistake I did. I didn't really mean it at first and forgot Saturday >.<
The answer is indeed Sunday.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 07:48 AM
|
|
I've got dozens. Here's another one:
The leaky pipe.
A pipe sprung a leak on its underside so that it leaked 5 gallons of water per hour until the pipe was empty 4 hours later. The leak was not detected and the pipe was refilled but a second leak, of exactly the same size, occurred immediately. The pipe was now leaking at a rate of 10 gallons of water per hour but this time it took 3 hours to empty. Can you explain why?
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 07:56 AM
|
|
The pipe was not full at first, and had 10 gallons of water less than its full capacity?
Maybe the second leak occurred further up the pipe, meaning that some way, the leak was above the surface of the water in the pipe?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 08:03 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Unknown008
The pipe was not full at first, and had 10 gallons of water less than its full capacity?
Maybe the second leak occured further up the pipe, meaning that some way, the leak was above the surface of the water in the pipe?
The pipe was at full capacity again.
You're getting close with the second leak's location.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 08:12 AM
|
|
Well, if you want math in this, the second leak was halfway up from the first leak to the top of the pipe.
Unless we are taking a real example, where the rate of flow of water will depend on the height of the water surface above the leak.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 08:17 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Unknown008
Well, if you want math in this, the second leak was halfway up from the first leak to the top of the pipe.
Unless we are taking a real example, where the rate of flow of water will depend on the height of the water surface above the leak.
Yes, the second leak was halfway up the pipe... so...
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 08:20 AM
|
|
So, for the first hour, 10 gallons went away.
Then, the rate becomes 5 gal/hr
Since there are 10 gals remaining, it takes additional 2 hours for a total of 3 hours.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 08:28 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Unknown008
So, for the first hour, 10 gallons went away.
Then, the rate becomes 5 gal/hr
Since there are 10 gals remaining, it takes additional 2 hours for a total of 3 hours.
You've got it! Good job, Jerry.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 08:36 AM
|
|
My homework is right!
At a local school a teacher gave the children a few math problems for homework. The next day the teacher pulled Tom out and told him that he had all of his wrong.
His answers to the problems set were:
10+7=5
9+6=3
11+5=4
8+11=7
Tom was also right. How was this so?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 08:47 AM
|
|
It looks like time on a clock. For example, 10:00 plus 7 hours would be 5:00.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 08:58 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Just Looking
It looks like time on a clock. For example, 10:00 plus 7 hours would be 5:00.
That's it! Good job.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 09:00 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by jmjoseph
That's it! Good job.
Thanks. :) As Adam would say, can we have another one?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 09:15 AM
|
|
The Fire
The couple had just finished building their home and because the night would be very cold, they wanted to build a fire to keep warm. The wind outside was gusting at 40mph and they were soon very cozy and fell asleep. A few hours later they were both dead. What had gone wrong?
CLUES:
1. The home had not burned down.
2. The house had not blown down.
3. They had not suffocated.
4. They had not been burned to death.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 09:19 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by jmjoseph
The Fire
The couple had just finished building their home and because the night would be very cold, they wanted to build a fire to keep warm. The wind outside was gusting at 40mph and they were soon very cozy and fell asleep. A few hours later they were both dead. What had gone wrong?
CLUES:
1. The home had not burned down.
2. The house had not blown down.
3. They had not suffocated.
4. They had not been burned to death.
Is this a lateral thinking puzzle where we have to ask yes or no questions?
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 09:20 AM
|
|
The fire switched off and they froze to death
... as opposed to being burned to death?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 09:24 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Just Looking
Is this a lateral thinking puzzle where we have to ask yes or no questions?
Yes, these are from the Mensa book "Lateral Thinking & Logical Deduction". Ask all the questions that you like.
No Jerry, the fire did NOT go out.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 09:27 AM
|
|
Did they die of natural causes?
Were they murdered?
Did the fire somehow lead to their death?
Is it relevant that the house is newly built?
Were they old?
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 09:29 AM
|
|
Was the house made of wood?
Did the house has wooden supports?
Could the fire have burned these supports and the house crumbled down?
Did they get killed by someone?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 9, 2010, 09:55 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Just Looking
Did they die of natural causes?
Were they murdered?
Did the fire somehow lead to their death?
Is it relevant that the house is newly built?
Were they old?
The fire did somehow lead to their death. The rest are "No" answers.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
New Lateral Thinking Puzzle
[ 69 Answers ]
I decided to start a new thread cause ones that get really, really long start making me nutso after a while. This one shouldn't be as difficult as the albatross one was. (But I didn't say it was easy.)
I flipped the tent flap open and surveyed the scene.
On the floor, in the center of the...
Lateral Thinking Puzzle (Restaurant)
[ 174 Answers ]
I brought this idea up on a different thread and a few said they were game, but anyone who cares to participate can. (Since this is games, is it OK to post it here, or should this move to the lounge or something?)
The idea is that a scenario is given with very little detail, just a little...
Snafooz Puzzles
[ 1 Answers ]
Has anyone heard of Snafooz puzzles? It was a set of 6 progresively harder cube puzzles, I have difficulty 2 and 4 but want all 6... I can't find them anywhere except sites where they sell them as advertising materials and expect you to buy them in packs of several hundred at once.
The website...
Puzzles
[ 2 Answers ]
Who loves puzzles?
I love puzzles so much, the rock.
I have a favourite artist that dose puzzles
View more questions
Search
|