Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #161

    May 24, 2013, 07:56 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Sigh, your words:



    Their name is on the application, they don't need to Google it.
    How is a fourth targeting just the TPARTY? And how does the NAME on an application exempt further investigation? Are you saying investigate everyone EXCEPT the TPARTY?

    That's utterly ridiculous.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #162

    May 24, 2013, 08:09 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    How is a fourth targeting just the TPARTY? And how does the NAME on an application exempt further investigation? Are you saying investigate everyone EXCEPT the TPARTY?

    That's utterly ridiculous.
    What's utterly ridiculous are your questions.

    There is only relevant fact needed to answer your silly questions. From the outset, and the whole reason this came up - as noted in the original post on this board - was an IRS admission of wrongdoing in targeting conservative groups.

    'Nuff said, your repeated hammering at this same nonsense is pointless.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #163

    May 24, 2013, 08:17 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, tom:

    That's what the IG said - NOT the IRS. I wanna know if anybody from IRS said they "targeted" conservative organizations.

    excon
    I guess their apology means nothing . Even CBS is using the word targeted in their reporting .
    IRS targeted tea party groups earlier than 2012 - CBS News
    But keep on denying it if you choose. By the way Doug Shulman visited the White House 118 times ;and not all of them were to roll easter eggs. I predict he will face pergury charges unless he fesses up about who in the White House was behind this .
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #164

    May 24, 2013, 08:19 AM
    Naw, the right wing noise machine is still making this a scandal because the Prez told them to do it.

    I ask questions to gain understanding, you holler to make noise and distract from your inability to answer questions. This allows you to keep your own facts that allows you to see what you want.

    What you think I didn't notice?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #165

    May 24, 2013, 08:25 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Naw, the right wing noise machine is still making this a scandal because the Prez told them to do it.

    I ask questions to gain understanding, you holler to make noise and distract from your inability to answer questions. This allows you to keep your own facts that allows you to see what you want.

    What you think I didn't notice?
    At least we don't just make 'em up out of thin air, like the war on women which is actually being waged by the left, but I digress. If you still cannot acknowledge the first fact you have no credibility on this my friend.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #166

    May 24, 2013, 09:13 AM
    Hello again, tom:

    I guess their apology means nothing .
    It means something... But, not enough to CONVICT anybody... I'm looking for the WORDS, since you have an affinity for them, out of the IRS mouth that said they TARGETED anybody...

    I want to hear the word TARGET out of their mouth. If that word is MISSING, then it's YOUR word, and there's NO scandal... Nothing... Nada. It's right wing gums flapping..

    Excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #167

    May 24, 2013, 09:33 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, tom:

    It means something... But, not enough to CONVICT anybody... I'm looking for the WORDS, since you have an affinity for them, out of the IRS mouth that said they TARGETED anybody...

    I wanna hear the word TARGET out of their mouth. If that word is MISSING, then it's YOUR word, and there's NO scandal... Nothing... Nada. It's right wing gums flapping..

    excon
    So if I killed someone but didn't say "I killed someone" I really didn't kill anyone? You guys logic on this is well, lame - it all depends on what the definition of is is.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #168

    May 24, 2013, 09:36 AM
    So only the exact word coming out of the people who did the offense matters... not the Inspector General who did the investigation . Not the multiple news organizations that the left normally swears by .For that matter ;EVERY major news outlet is using the word to describe what happened.
    IRS apologizes for targeting tea party groups
    IRS replaces official who oversaw targeting
    IRS IG Report: Targeting Conservatives Began In 2010 - ABC News

    Not the words of a long time lefty in good standing Dem Senator; Claire McCaskill,who said :

    “I'm mad. It is un-American, it is wrong, and we have to make sure that this gets fixed,” .... “There's a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don't apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.”...
    “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we've got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure that they are removed from the IRS and the word goes out that this is unacceptable,” she..... “It is un-American, it is wrong, and it cannot occur again.”
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #169

    May 24, 2013, 09:50 AM
    Hello again, wingers:
    so only the exact word coming out of the people who did the offense matters...
    What matters is YOU said, THEY said they TARGETED people, and they DIDN'T say that at all.

    Here's some more words you might or might not understand. If they SAID they targeted people, that's an admission.. If they DIDN'T say that, and YOU did, that's an accusation.

    And, THAT matters.

    Excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #170

    May 24, 2013, 10:05 AM
    I'll go with the IG accusing them and take it from there .
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #171

    May 24, 2013, 10:06 AM
    Lol, it's amusing that you suddenly won't accept admission of wrongdoing as evidence, but this idea that unless they said a certain word it didn't happen is really bizarre. But I'll play along once.


    Let's say immigration was profiling young Muslim men, or the cops were profiling young black men wearing hoodies, would that be targeting?

    Let's say the IRS put out a BOLO - “Be On the Look Out” - for Tea Party organizations applying for tax exempt status, would that be targeting?

    “In May 2010, the Determinations Unit [of the IRS] began developing a spreadsheet that would become known as the “Be On the Look Out” listing (hereafter referred to as the BOLO listing), which included the emerging issue of Tea Party applications. In June 2010, the Determinations Unit began training its specialists on issues to be aware of, including Tea Party cases. By July 2010, Determinations Unit management stated that it had requested its specialists to be on the lookout for Tea Party applications.” (Treasury Inspector General report)
    Target :

    Verb
    1. attack, aim at, pick out, single out, fire at
    2. choose, select, single out, earmark, fix on
    Collins Thesaurus of the English Language
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #172

    May 24, 2013, 10:29 AM
    Hello again, Steve:

    Lol, it's amusing that you suddenly won't accept admission of wrongdoing as evidence
    Oh, contraire. I'm LOOKING for an admission. That's why I asked tom to LINK it to me. He couldn't. I'm still waiting..

    Until then, this isn't about what THEY said.. It's about what YOU said they said, which they clearly DIDN'T..

    One is an admission. I know what that is. The other is an accusation. I know what that is too. They're NOT the same thing. One is a scandal. The other isn't.

    I don't know what so hard about this.

    Excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #173

    May 24, 2013, 10:43 AM
    No there actually is an admission... just not using the EXACT word targeted . It came from Lois Lerner herself . You know... the one who 1st claimed it was the doing of lower level staffers and now invokes constitutional protection against self incrimination.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #174

    May 24, 2013, 10:55 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:

    Oh, contraire. I'm LOOKING for an admission. That's why I asked tom to LINK it to me. He couldn't. I'm still waiting..

    Until then, this isn't about what THEY said.. It's about what YOU said they said, which they clearly DIDN'T..

    One is an admission. I know what that is. The other is an accusation. I know what that is too. They're NOT the same thing. One is a scandal. The other isn't.

    I dunno what so hard about this.

    excon
    I don't know what's so hard about this either, I've linked to it at least 3 times AFTER my original post - the ADMISSION is what started this whole thing. What the heck is so difficult to understand about that??
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #175

    May 24, 2013, 10:55 AM
    Hello again, tom:

    just not using the EXACT word targeted
    Ok, So, that's the word the right wing attached to it.. Now, we're getting someplace... What word DID she use when she admitted targeting?

    Excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #176

    May 24, 2013, 11:04 AM
    No WE did not attach the word to it . It was the IG ,it was the President's spokesman Jay Carney ,it's White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler ;it's EVERYONE in the MSM It's even the Huffpo,
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3307928.html
    ... in fact ,it's everyone but you.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #177

    May 24, 2013, 11:07 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    no there actually is an admission ... just not using the EXACT word targeted . It came from Lois Lerner herself . You know ... the one who 1st claimed it was the doing of lower level staffers and now invokes constitutional protection against self incrimination.
    She has a right to protect herself from right wing fear mongers who react to the smell of blood in the water, and need a scapegoat in case they fail to impeach the president they hate more than they hate the IRS.

    Everything is a possible scandal because that's what the want on the right.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #178

    May 24, 2013, 11:14 AM
    Hello again, Steve:

    I see that she said they "singled out" certain applications.. My tax returns were singled out too on several occasions, but I wasn't targeted.. It was for further examination... That appears to be what happened here. Examining them further isn't TARGETING. That's what the IRS DOES.

    That the dingbat Lois Lerner said the apology word, isn't enough to convince me they "targeted" anybody...

    excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #179

    May 24, 2013, 11:16 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    She has a right to protect herself from right wing fear mongers who react to the smell of blood in the water, and need a scapegoat in case they fail to impeach the president they hate more than they hate the IRS.

    Everything is a possible scandal because that's what the want on the right.
    Tal, you and ex are among the 14 people in the country that don't see a scandal.

    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #180

    May 24, 2013, 11:33 AM
    Hello tom:
    Tal, you and ex are among the 14 people in the country that don't see a scandal.
    I've never minded being in the minority. I see a bureaucratic boondoggle. I see bad management. But, I don't see a scandal.

    Look. Don't get me wrong.. I HATE government, and the IRS especially.. I also don't mind seeing Obama take a fall IF he's dirty... I don't carry his water. But, in order for me to DO that, I need PROOF. I need a smoking gun. I need something other than dufus IRS employees.

    Yes, the IRS guy visited the White House a bunch of times... That proves that he's been to the White House a bunch of times. I don't want to HEAR that crap. It's STUPID crap. I don't want to know what you THINK. I KNOW what you think.

    I want to know what the FACTS are...

    Excon

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Toyota Scandal [ 6 Answers ]

What kind of services or training do you think Toyota should give to the customers to gain back its reputation after the scandal occurred?

The real mortgage scandal [ 14 Answers ]

I read something on this a while back and finally found another column on it thanks to Sweetness & Light... And so what are the contenders' solutions to this crisis, brought on in the name of fairness, equality and other warm and fuzzy nonsense? Hillary wants a moratorium on...

Whoops, *another* Republican caught in sex scandal [ 6 Answers ]

Wash. legislator resigns over gay sex scandal | KTVB.COM | Regional News | Boise, Idaho News, Weather, Sports & Traffic This is happening with alarming regularity.

Protein bar scandal? [ 1 Answers ]

I have heard some talk about protein bars and how more than half of them LIE about the suppliment facts of their bar such as amount of fat, sat fat and other facts. Does anyone know any "trustworthy" protein bars out there that can assure me I am getting what I think I bought?


View more questions Search