Check out some similar questions!

paraclete · May 14, 2013, 04:43 AM

What you are saying is Evita had years to perfect coverup how come this one is so clumbsy

smoothy · May 14, 2013, 04:45 AM

tomder55 · May 14, 2013, 05:00 AM

Originally Posted by paraclete

what you are saying is Evita had years to perfect coverup how come this one is so clumbsy

Hubris . They count on the press running cover for them .

smoothy · May 15, 2013, 11:11 AM

smoothy · May 16, 2013, 09:08 AM

Stuff that hasn't hit tne press yet... or even FOX which if verified make this far worse and far more serious than we even thought it was.

They Came, They Murdered, They Covered It Up:

When General Hamm received his "stand down" orders from Panetta on behalf of Obama, he defiantly made plans to go ahead with the rescue and was arrested within minutes of contravening the order by his second in command, General Rodriquez.

Out to sea, Admiral Gayouette, the commander of Carrier Strike Group Three, was preparing to provide intelligence and air cover for General Hamm's rescue team in violation of his standing orders and he was promptly relieved of command for allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.

Both men are being held today in undisclosed locations. As an aside, if there is any kind of a silver lining in these very dark clouds it appears that much of the senior military leadership has had enough of the traitorous Obama and his den of corrupt criminals and some of them are willing to risk career in the name of actually serving the American people.

Mr. Hodges reminds us Hillary Clinton has been connected to a string of suspicious and suspiciously convenient deaths in the past. We also recall former president Bill Clinton is accused by some of handing military secrets to China while in office, and former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta's public involvement with a self declared Marxist organization, and president Obama's alliances with terrorist revolutionaries and malodorous race supremacists.

Mr. Hodges's version of the Benghazi event is volatile stuff. It describes near-treason if not treason itself. If the allegations centering on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are substantiated, and if principals in the administration are shown to be complicit, they betrayed their oath and their countrymen on behalf of an active belligerent. It's alleged elsewhere untraceable foreign accounts are a substantial source of their political funding, which may speak to the question of embedded duplicity on a more quantitative basis.

What difference at this point does it make?
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Ms. Clinton needs to understand, deeply and abidingly, "it" makes a difference at this or any other point. The nation should not accept the "mistakes were made" brushoff this time, nor apologies and resignations, nor even outright terminations. We're running out of dirt to draw a line in. If all or most of this is true, it warrants aggressive and decisive legal proceedings to remove co-conspirators from office on an emergency basis, and bulldog prosecution for all involved, top to bottom and side to side.

tomder55 · May 16, 2013, 09:51 AM

That is my general understanding of the purge of the senior ranks in the days after Benghazi. Wish one of them would come forth and testify . But they have pensions they are protecting .

Catsmine · May 16, 2013, 11:48 AM

Since this is devolving into the "What's new at 1600 Scandal Ave." thread, the hits just keep on coming.

Great news: US has misplaced two former Witness Protection Program participants “known or suspected as terrorists”; Update: Failed to update no-fly lists? « Hot Air

smoothy · May 16, 2013, 12:01 PM

Yep... just heard that one hit the news... just now.

excon · May 16, 2013, 02:59 PM

Hello again,

What's new at 1600 Scandal Ave.

Enjoy your orgasm while it lasts. But, as Obama said, there's no THERE, there. There's only right wingers running around with their hair on fire.

Excon

Catsmine · May 16, 2013, 04:24 PM

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again,

Enjoy your orgasm while it lasts. But, as Obama said, there's no THERE, there. There's only right wingers running around with their hair on fire.

excon

Right. Tricky D!ckie wasn't a crook, either.

tomder55 · May 16, 2013, 04:33 PM

The speech you will hear by the summer :

" It can now be revealed that my wife Michelle conceived and led the Benghazi cover-up ;the AP wiretapping ,and the IRS assault on the right wing. I am deeply disappointed ;and let me be clear ;I will not tolerate this behavior ............uuuuhhh ....I of course had nothing to do with it".

tomder55 · May 16, 2013, 06:45 PM

paraclete · May 16, 2013, 07:20 PM

Very humourous Tom and right on the money. It's called plausible deniability, of course he didn't know right at the moment it happened but he knew when someone told him.

smoothy · May 16, 2013, 07:38 PM

Only truly incompetent leaders don't know what the people under them are up to at all times...

And its just as true with Politicians as it is a Manager for a McDonalds

paraclete · May 16, 2013, 07:50 PM

Originally Posted by smoothy

Only truly incompetent leaders don't know what the people under them are up to at all times....

And its just as true with Politicians as it is a Manager for a McDonalds

He obviously needs more informants then

smoothy · May 16, 2013, 07:53 PM

Originally Posted by paraclete

he obviously needs more informants then

I don't believe he is that clueless... I believe he knows everything that was going on...

I think he's has ZERO leadership skills... but I don't believe he's that clueless about what his people are doing.

paraclete · May 16, 2013, 11:11 PM

Well the witch hunt will inevietably find answers but the witch has flown

Catsmine · May 17, 2013, 02:31 AM

Originally Posted by smoothy

I don't believe he is that clueless........I believe he knows everything that was going on.

On this point I disagree. I do believe he put his favorite ideologues in authority and thought he could take credit for what they did. Witness his preening over the Osama raid.

Now that his ideologues have screwed up and gotten caught, he's going to try to rename them all "Bush."

tomder55 · May 17, 2013, 03:46 AM

Originally Posted by Catsmine

On this point I disagree. I do believe he put his favorite ideologues in authority and thought he could take credit for what they did. Witness his preening over the Osama raid.

Now that his ideologues have screwed up and gotten caught, he's going to try to rename them all "Bush."

Yes . Then he has time for golf and hosting celebrity concerts in the White House.(oops ,I said golf.. how very racist of me ).

speechlesstx · May 17, 2013, 10:01 AM

The latest defense from the White House on Benghazi, they aren't liars, just idiots. No, really.

"We're portrayed by Republicans as either being lying or idiots," said one Obama administration official who was part of the Benghazi response. "It's actually closer to us being idiots."

I have more confidence than ever in this administration!