Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    cdad's Avatar
    cdad Posts: 12,700, Reputation: 1438
    Internet Research Expert
     
    #661

    Feb 2, 2013, 05:28 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    I would prefer evolution instead and as WG and Dad are pointing out, its so complex, rational dialogue is whats needed, not just laws and guns.
    Dang it!! Where is that geenie button. ;)
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #662

    Feb 2, 2013, 05:37 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    I would prefer evolution instead and as WG and Dad are pointing out, its so complex, rational dialogue is whats needed, not just laws and guns.
    Tell that to Governor Andrew Cuomo who couldn't wait to ram-rod the most ridiculous draconian law about guns in the nation through the NY government... without a sniff of rational dialogue
    cdad's Avatar
    cdad Posts: 12,700, Reputation: 1438
    Internet Research Expert
     
    #663

    Feb 2, 2013, 05:41 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    Tell that to Governor Andrew Cuomo who couldn't wait to ram-rod the most ridiculous draconian law about guns in the nation through the NY government ....without a sniff of rational dialogue
    Big surprise... a politician Grandstanding.


    At least here we seem to have settled down in the debate and are now focusing on problems and issues instead of straight emotions.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #664

    Feb 2, 2013, 05:46 AM
    He's trying to set up a 2016 Presidential run. His only chance is if Evita is telling the truth when she says she's not running .
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #665

    Feb 2, 2013, 06:16 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    But then we have fatherless families with single moms raising children (created by more than one father), and she works two and three jobs while the children come home from school to an empty house and get into all kinds of mischief, plus look to gangs (i.e., guns and violence) and the opposite sex to find "love" and a support system since there is none at home. So how does one tackle that problem?.
    I don't know, seems to me that's the consequences of feminism, the sexual revolution, secular humanism, the liberal education system and just otherwise isolating and demonizing faith and family values... imho.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #666

    Feb 2, 2013, 06:22 AM
    I will say it again, there is a big difference between the big city, and the rural cities. Crime and gangs are much more pervasive in NY, than say a burg of a few thousand people. Seldom do you have so many enclaves of drugs and violence and poverty, than the larger cities. Cops are busy and out and about and makes no sense for them to be out gunned. The vehicle of death is not crazy people acting out, but bands of people with bad intentions.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #667

    Feb 2, 2013, 07:48 AM
    Would you then support the NYC solution of stop and frisk ? Or the more high tech version demonstrated by Police Commissioner Ray Kelly ?
    NYPD testing new scanner that detects hidden guns - NYPOST.com
    I can tell you that stop and frisk has been a highly successful program. There were 414 murders in NYC last year; a record low homicide rate . That is a drop from a high of over 2,000 in the Koch and Dinken years. The high tech version will be less intrusive and more effective .

    Cops are busy and out and about and makes no sense for them to be out gunned.
    Yeah but BOZO Cuomo forgot that cops use guns. He outlawed the magazines the cops service revolver uses.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #668

    Feb 2, 2013, 08:07 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    I don't know, seems to me that's the consequences of feminism, the sexual revolution, secular humanism, the liberal education system and just otherwise isolating and demonizing faith and family values...imho.
    You really want to go back to women/mothers at home 24/7 and cooking a delicious and nutritious dinner every night that the whole family sat down at and conversed happily over, only fathers working, teachers and education respected and worth something, the church as the center of social/family life, a gallon of gasoline at 30 cents? Surely you jest!
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #669

    Feb 2, 2013, 08:44 AM
    You could have all of that and the woman still having a choice . Maybe the man can cook a meal . I can. We both work and still made sure we left time for sit down family meals .We both do basic household chores ;and both parent.. Oh sometimes there was scheduling challenges ,but nothing that couldn't be worked out ,and it beats the hell out of one person trying to be both bread winner and parent .
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #670

    Feb 2, 2013, 09:26 AM
    How the household functions is best left to the couple, but many house holds are headed by a single person and a lot are females. That's reality and should not be subjected to anyone's moral value system.

    I have always been against stop and frisk without probable cause other than just race or age. Cast a wide net you can catch a few fish, that's blatant profiling. I am all for cops having new tools, but I hope its just not aimed at the hoodie crowd and that's their only probable cause. I can see it for safety in legit cases.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #671

    Feb 2, 2013, 09:34 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    you could have all of that and the woman still having a choice . Maybe the man can cook a meal . I can. We both work and still made sure we left time for sit down family meals .We both do basic household chores ;and both parent.. Oh sometimes there was scheduling challenges ,but nothing that couldn't be worked out ,and it beats the hell out of one person trying to be both bread winner and parent .
    And we parents (married and in a stable relationship) teach our children from little on that they are part of the family and household and so contribute in whatever way they can, especially by doing chores appropriate to their age and ability. We parents monitor their schoolwork/homework and have ongoing communication with teachers and school. We parents establish a moral base, first with each other and then include children as they are born and brought up. Music will be classical, religious/spiritual, jazz, popular with only G-rated lyrics. Movies will be heartwarming or funny or even exciting but will always have a moral. TV shows will be similar to movies. No one will need guns except if they hunt, and those guns will be securely locked up.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #672

    Feb 2, 2013, 09:43 AM
    and it beats the hell out of one person trying to be both bread winner and parent .
    Reality check------Some have to be both.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #673

    Feb 2, 2013, 10:48 AM
    How the household functions is best left to the couple, but many house holds are headed by a single person and a lot are females. That's reality and should not be subjected to anyone's moral value system.
    I won't speak of the 2 female couple. But you and I know that a single parent is less than ideal.
    Reality check------Some have to be both
    reality check... duh... I was speaking about what ought to be.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #674

    Feb 2, 2013, 10:51 AM
    I speak of what is, and made no mention of a two female household, just one person, male, or female, same difference. That's reality too.

    I wish I was rich, instead of handsome but that's my reality. :)
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #675

    Feb 2, 2013, 10:56 AM
    .fine then I'll repeat Steve's appropriate comment since it contributes to the reality

    I don't know, seems to me that's the consequences of feminism, the sexual revolution, secular humanism, the liberal education system and just otherwise isolating and demonizing faith and family values... imho.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #676

    Feb 2, 2013, 11:03 AM
    I have always been against stop and frisk without probable cause other than just race or age. Cast a wide net you can catch a few fish, that's blatant profiling. I am all for cops having new tools, but I hope its just not aimed at the hoodie crowd and that's their only probable cause. I can see it for safety in legit cases.
    NYC ,before the new nonsense Cuomo law ,already had one of the toughest gun control laws in the nation.. maybe Chi-towns is tougher... both are ineffective as you just pointed out. The 2nd amendment you think is OK to violate ;but... have a solution that works ;and suddenly that amendment is inviolable.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #677

    Feb 2, 2013, 01:53 PM
    faith and family values
    People of faith are no better or no worse that people with no faith, people are individuals not groups that get given common traits to all.
    "Family values" is actually a meaningless statement as no one can define it.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #678

    Feb 4, 2013, 07:51 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    People of faith are no better or no worse that people with no faith, people are individuals not groups that get given common traits to all.
    "Family values" is actually a meaningless statement as no one can define it.
    And that attitude is a perfect demonstration of the problem.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #679

    Feb 4, 2013, 07:58 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    And that attitude is a perfect demonstration of the problem.
    Please define -- what is a family and are its values?
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #680

    Feb 4, 2013, 08:01 AM
    Family values is code for MY family values are correct, and YOURS is wicked. Its not a lack of definition, its an imposition of definitions that's the problem. Now everyone takes their INDIVIDUAL rights as absolute, written in stone, no changes, or variations according to the rights of anyone else.

    It gives the strong license to subjugate the weak in the name of defending those rights.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Gun Control... it didn't take long [ 1292 Answers ]

I won't go into hysterics that Obama is going to take away our guns. Just one question. If the US backs a UN Treaty to restrict small arms ,what is the law of the land ? The treaty ,or the Constitution of the land... specifically the 2nd Amendment ? After Obama win, U.S. backs new U.N....

Gun control. My thoughts. Just shoot me now. This thread won't end well. [ 332 Answers ]

Okay, I do have thoughts on gun control, and I promised to start a thread where we could discuss guns, and peoples thoughts on guns. But I didn't start the thread about the Connecticut massacre to discuss gun control. That was about the families and their loss. So, to keep that Connecticut...

Gun control by fiat? [ 17 Answers ]

Who needs a congress? King Obama is reportedly working on gun control "under the radar" by way of executive order or regulatory means. WaPo did a story on White House gun control czar Steve Crowley which had this little tidbit that just almost escaped notice. I'm sure that is "under the...

Gun Control [ 29 Answers ]

Hello: The killer we've been talking about was subdued AFTER he emptied his magazine and before he could insert another. He was using 30 round clips. THOSE clips were illegal under the Assault Weapons Ban that EXPIRED under Bush and was not reinstated. If it HAD been reinstated, the killer...

Gun control and socialized medicine in Europe [ 1 Answers ]

Are any countries in Europe that do not have either gun control laws or socialized medicine? I know they're very "europe-y" things to do, but I don't know if the EU requires them, or if a bunch of countries just decided to institute them. (I know the exact polices vary a bit, so I'm guessing it's...


View more questions Search