[Wondergirl]

How would you know Tal, you refuse to give it a chance.

No one in this thread has objected to voter ID. In fact, everyone has been for it. The objection has been to the timing and process of it.

[speechlesstx]

Tal can speak for himself.

[talaniman]

How would you know Tal, you refuse to give it a chance.

I haven't refused at all, just DEMAND the process of implementation be fair and efficient!!

You think its okay to bake a cake using MUD??

[tomder55]

As long as we leave the elections to partisans, this stuff is going to happen. I think TUT called for nationalization of the elections.. That may NOT be a bad idea.

I don't believe nationalization is a constitutional option

Is there anything the left doesn't want nationalized ? Health care ,the auto industry ,education ;and now elections .

[excon]

Hello again, tom:

I'm a free market kind of guy... I ALSO support the Constitution. But, I'm not STUPID. I believe in local control until local control sticks it up my a$$.. Then it's time for the feds to step in... That's true in health care, and that's true in local elections... I'm reminded of the federal troops that stepped in when Alabama was sticking it up my a$$ too. I LOVED it.

I believe YOUR side is the one who's sniveling about the integrity of the vote... You should champion nationalization.. But, you don't want integrity... You want the dirty tricks playing field left to yourself..

excon

[tomder55]

Nope ;I want integrity of the franchise . That means ID . That means taking dead people off the voter rolls . But of course if you turn a blind eye to the problem you will never see the problem.

[Wondergirl]

nope ;I want integrity of the franchise . That means ID . That means taking dead people off the voter rolls . But of course if you turn a blind eye to the problem you will never see the problem.

We are all in favor of voter ID.

[paraclete]

Tom I don't think you need to worry about dead people on the rolls, it's the zombies you elect you have to worry about

[talaniman]

Operative linked to voter registration fraud still working for GOP? - Salon.com

Integrity? Of course Acorn was defunded for less, but this guy is still getting paid. Where is the integrity?

We know where it ain't though!

[speechlesstx]

We are all in favor of voter ID.

I don't buy it one bit.

[tomder55]

I don't buy it one bit.

Me neither since in the 1st 60+ response the argument was against the need for one

https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/3183557-post66.html

[Wondergirl]

Me neither since in the 1st 60+ response the argument was against the need for one

Ask Me Help Desk - View Single Post - Voter ID/Suppression

That was not a vote against it.

[speechlesstx]

Why would someone argue there is no need for one while supporting it anyway? Doesn't make sense. At all.

[excon]

Hello again, Steve:

Have you ever heard of the word, process? I think not.

excon

[Wondergirl]

Why would someone argue there is no need for one while supporting it anyway? Doesn't make sense. At all.

There is "no need for it" two months before an election.

[speechlesstx]

Have either of you ever heard of the word "dodge."

[Wondergirl]

Have either of you ever heard of the word "dodge."

Dodge what? You don't do something so complicated just before an election. You do it a year or more ahead of time so everyone who is eligible to vote can do so in the future.

[speechlesstx]

Well that answered my question.

[talaniman]

No your answer is the one the courts have been telling you, go back to the drawing board and get a better process going.

Obama and the democrats are not the ones rejecting your new law, the COURTS did. They just pointed out the flaws and inefficiencies and the court obviously agreed!

[tomder55]

What is a resonable time frame ? The PA law was passed in the spring. I suspect the time frame would've been fine any other year . Your guys played prevent defense and delay... and then complain there isn't enough time .