Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #281

    Jul 24, 2012, 06:15 AM
    Unbelievable. How does the contract between a citizen and a private company hurt a homeless shelter, orphanage or hospital for that matter?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #282

    Jul 24, 2012, 06:41 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Exactly, thats the free market.
    So you've finally realized it is the employer paying for the contraceptives. Now that we have that out of the way, that's wrong to force the church to violate their beliefs and pay for contraceptives and abortifacients.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #283

    Jul 24, 2012, 06:47 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Unbelievable. How does the contract between a citizen and a private company hurt a homeless shelter, orphanage or hospital for that matter?
    What part of churches closing their ministries rather than violate their conscience do you not get? Is the government ready to take on that load or do you just have no concept of the vast number of people the church serves without costing you a cent?
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #284

    Jul 24, 2012, 06:50 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    What part of churches closing their ministries rather than violate their conscience do you not get?
    That's a business decision they are allowed to take. When businesses close their doors others often take over.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #285

    Jul 24, 2012, 06:51 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by TUT317 View Post
    I think we have talked about the problems of 'contextomy' in another post. I am not saying it is a problem here- but it may well be.

    Tut
    Here you go:

    Thomas Jefferson to Joseph Milligan
    6 Apr. 1816Writings 14:466

    Whether property alone, and the whole of what each citizen possesses, shall be subject to contribution, or only its surplus after satisfying his first wants, or whether the faculties of body and mind shall contribute also from their annual earnings, is a question to be decided. But, when decided, and the principle settled, it is to be equally and fairly applied to all. To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry, and the fruits acquired by it." If the overgrown wealth of an individual be deemed dangerous to the State, the best corrective is the law of equal inheritance to all in equal degree; and the better, as this enforces a law of nature, while extra-taxation violates it.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #286

    Jul 24, 2012, 07:00 AM
    the best corrective is the law of equal inheritance to all in equal degree; and the better, as this enforces a law of nature, while extra-taxation violates it.
    Hello again, Steve:

    I'm a Jeffersonian.. The problem we have is figuring out whether taxing the richest people in the land, people who are GETTING richer as we speak, is "extra-taxation"..

    Me and Jefferson, say no.

    Excon
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #287

    Jul 24, 2012, 07:04 AM
    The church won't close anything speech, and they haven't after all this time. Why should they? If tribal challenges didn't stop missionaries, then how are a few pills going to do it? Closing hospitals because of insurance companies doesn't make sense either.

    Don't offer insurance, pay the church employees the difference, and let them get their own insurance. If the STATE they do business in allows that. 38 do NOT! That was before Obama.

    Churches are tax exempt, employees are NOT!
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #288

    Jul 24, 2012, 07:18 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    What part of churches closing their ministries rather than violate their conscience do you not get?
    Hello again, Steve:

    The part that they'll ACTUALLY do that.. Bwa, ha ha ha..

    excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #289

    Jul 24, 2012, 07:45 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    That's a business decision they are allowed to take. When businesses close their doors others often take over.
    A church is not a business.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #290

    Jul 24, 2012, 07:47 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    The church won't close anything speech, and they haven't after all this time. Why should they? If tribal challenges didn't stop missionaries, then how are a few pills gonna do it? Closing hospitals because of insurance companies doesn't make sense either.
    You really should pay more attention, I've proven this wrong on more than one occasion.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #291

    Jul 24, 2012, 07:49 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:

    The part that they'll ACTUALLY do that.. Bwa, ha ha ha..

    excon
    They have done it, they are doing it, they will do it. Unlike the government the church as an institution will do everything in her power to maintain her integrity.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #292

    Jul 24, 2012, 07:49 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    A church is not a business.
    Hello again, Steve:

    Then maybe it shouldn't try to BE a business and expect to be treated like a church..

    excon
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #293

    Jul 24, 2012, 07:50 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    They have done it, they are doing it, Unlike the government the church as an institution will do everything in her power to maintain her integrity.
    Hello again, Steve:

    Got any links?

    Their integrity?? Aren't they NOW paying state taxes on the same thing?? What?? A church doesn't have any integrity when it's being taxed by the STATE?

    I didn't know that.

    excon
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #294

    Jul 24, 2012, 07:53 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    They have done it, they are doing it, they will do it. Unlike the government the church as an institution will do everything in her power to maintain her integrity.
    Including hiding rapists from prosecution. Oh wait that was the Catholic Church, not YOUR church. Sorry.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #295

    Jul 24, 2012, 08:03 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:

    Then maybe it shouldn't try to BE a business and expect to be treated like a church..

    excon
    Back to that same, fallacious argument.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #296

    Jul 24, 2012, 08:06 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Including hiding rapists from prosecution. Oh wait that was the Catholic Church, not YOUR church. Sorry.
    No, I'm not Catholic and that must be the new Godwin's Law. Any discussion about the church will inevitably lead to references to pedophile priests. You can do better.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #297

    Jul 24, 2012, 08:08 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:

    Got any links?
    Search my posts, it's there, even on this thread. I'm not going to keep repeating myself because you're too lazy to pay attention.

    Their integrity?? Aren't they NOW paying state taxes on the same thing?? What?? A church doesn't have any integrity when it's being taxed by the STATE?
    Got any links?
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #298

    Jul 24, 2012, 08:18 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    No, I'm not Catholic and that must be the new Godwin's Law. Any discussion about the church will inevitably lead to references to pedophile priests. You can do better.
    Harshness Warning

    The church can do better, and victimizing little boys for years isn't a small thing because if they are capable of rape,what else are they capable of. Harboring criminals is NOT integrity.

    For a guy who is big on protecting the helpless unborn, you don't have a problem throwing the helpless born under the bus.

    If World vision relieves your guilt, go for it. It doesn't relieve you of RESPONSIBILITY!

    Those are not references, those are victims of church malfeasance,and criminality!! Worst, a betrayal of trust!!
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #299

    Jul 24, 2012, 08:28 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Harshness Warning

    The church can do better, and victimizing little boys for years isn't a small thing because if they are capable of rape,what else are they capable of. Harboring criminals is NOT integrity.

    For a guy who is big on protecting the helpless unborn, you don't have a problem throwing the helpless born under the bus.

    If World vision relieves your guilt, go for it. It doesn't relieve you of RESPONSIBILITY!

    Those are not references, those are victims of church malfeasance,and criminality!!!! Worst, a betrayal of trust!!!!
    You should have had a "Pulling sh*t out of my a$$ warning."

    Really Tal, enough of your BS assumptions. What part of "No, I'm not Catholic" did you fail to comprehend, and even if I were why in the hell would I defend pedophiles? I don't, I haven't and I won't, so before you EVER accuse me of "throwing the helpless born under the bus" you'd better be d@mn sure you have your facts straight.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #300

    Jul 24, 2012, 08:58 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    What part of "No, I'm not Catholic" did you fail to comprehend, and even if I were why in the hell would I defend pedophiles?
    Well it's not just catholics - they get the headlines:
    Catholic priests no guiltier of sex abuse than other clergy
    Wisconsin-based Church Mutual Insurance Co. has 100,000 client churches and has seen a steady filing of about five sexual molestation cases a week for more than a decade, even though its client base has grown.

    “It would be incorrect to call it a Catholic problem,” said Church Mutual’s risk control manager, Rick Schaber. “We do not see one denomination above another. It’s equal. It’s also equal among large metropolitan churches and small rural churches.”

    Iowa-based Guide One Center for Risk Management, which insures more than 40,000 congregations, also said Catholic churches are not considered a greater risk or charged higher premiums.

    “Our claims experience shows this happens evenly across denominations,” said spokeswoman Melanie Stonewall.
    So people are just doing what they have learned to do from this Current Events board: find a few crazies and attribute it to a whole group.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Birth control pills [ 3 Answers ]

Is it possible to be pregnant if I am using birth control pills while breastfeeding?

Birth control pills [ 0 Answers ]

I know that you must take your pill at the same time every day for 21 days, but what about the next pack? Can you go from taking the pill at 7am every day for one month, to taking it at say, 1pm everyday the next month? Or do you have to take it at the time you started taking it, forever?

Birth control pills [ 3 Answers ]

Hello, My name is Sarah, I am 31 years old, I started using birth control pills as of the 11 th of this month, I used to take them( the same brand) few years ago, they are called diane 35, in some contries they are called dianete 35,, This type of birth control is OTC, and prescribed by...

Birth control pills [ 7 Answers ]

A doctor once told me if you over dose on the contraceptive pill it has the same affect as the mornin after pill. True or false?


View more questions Search