Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #61

    Feb 7, 2012, 10:00 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    one of ours:



    It is a fantastic hospital, one of the best in the country and I wasn't using mere words looking for first amendment protection - history is on my side. You'd be ok with it shutting down rather than violate its beliefs.
    It believes in women using contraception so I guess it's a respectable hospital (and this is without anyone telling them to do so):
    Birth control options for women

    Highlights

    Birth Control Options
    Birth control options for women include:
    Hormonal contraceptives, such as birth control pills, skin patch, vaginal ring
    Intrauterine devices (IUDs)
    Barrier devices, such as condoms, diaphragm, and the cervical cap
    Fertility awareness methods
    Sterilization
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #62

    Feb 7, 2012, 10:14 AM
    You do realize that does not necessarily reflect the views of the Hospital, it's provided by ADAM.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #63

    Feb 7, 2012, 11:03 AM
    Hello again, Steve:

    The hospitals won't shut down.. The church will have to get used to their hospitals BEING hospitals INSTEAD of church's, which IS reality, after all. If they can't, then they'll be sold.

    excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #64

    Feb 7, 2012, 11:35 AM
    I can't wait until this regime mandates that Muslim providers must perform vasectomies.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #65

    Feb 7, 2012, 11:53 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    I can't wait until this regime mandates that Muslim providers must perform vasectomies.
    Nice try but still utterly, totally, completely, unequivocally irrelevant to the issue.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #66

    Feb 7, 2012, 12:09 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:

    The hospitals won't shut down.. The church will have to get used to their hospitals BEING hospitals INSTEAD of church's, which IS reality, after all. If they can't, then they'll be sold.

    excon
    Nah just hand them over to Pope Obama (he became Pope in a recess appointment ) .
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #67

    Feb 7, 2012, 12:14 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Nice try but still utterly, totally, completely, unequivocally irrelevant to the issue.
    How so?
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #68

    Feb 7, 2012, 12:46 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    How so?
    Wait until the Republicans try to kill all liberals, then people will understand their crazy regime!
    TUT317's Avatar
    TUT317 Posts: 657, Reputation: 76
    Senior Member
     
    #69

    Feb 7, 2012, 01:27 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:

    And, if I wanted First Amendment protections, I'd say that too...

    But, I've been to a church, and I've been to a hospital.. They AIN'T the same thing. They're not even close.

    Lemme ask you this.. Let's say I started the Church of Blessed Marijuana. Would I be protected? Why not? Under the First Amendment, I absolutely believe that I SHOULD be protected. But, if I opened a medical cannabis dispensary, I'd need a city license, and I'd need to pay sales tax... No????

    excon

    Hi Ex,

    In the end it will probably be up to the black robed oligarchs of the supreme court to make the call.

    Tut
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #70

    Feb 7, 2012, 01:40 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Wait until the Republicans try to kill all liberals, then people will understand their crazy regime!
    Well, that was an unhinged remark.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #71

    Feb 7, 2012, 02:56 PM
    If insurance pays for viagra, then why not pay for the pill? Oh that's right, the catholic church don't think woman are as entitled as men.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #72

    Feb 7, 2012, 03:01 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by TUT317 View Post
    Hi Ex,

    In the end it will probably be up to the black robed oligarchs of the supreme court to make the call.

    Tut
    Indeed it will... This dictate comes close to the antics the national statists pulled on the Catholic Church in the 1930s in Europe.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #73

    Feb 7, 2012, 08:30 PM
    Hello:

    Let me say again, church's are given their exemption from taxes BECAUSE they're churches.. If they want to BE something else, that's cool, they certainly may be, but they're no longer churches.

    excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #74

    Feb 8, 2012, 03:19 AM
    Get rid of the tax exemption. That shouldn't be a quid pro quo for the state to dictate terms that are morally offensive and if it is then shame on the state . Just the fact that the church is providing these non-profit services should be enough to justify the tax breaks . But if the state is going to use the tax break as a yoke around the churches neck then I just as soon it was ended.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #75

    Feb 8, 2012, 04:17 AM
    Tom you know as well as I do that it suits government to have churches provide services to the community, it means they don't have to do it
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #76

    Feb 8, 2012, 04:54 AM
    yes of course. This stuff going on is getting earily similar to the Reichskonkordat the church was forced to sign .

    "We should trap the priests by their notorious greed and self indulgence. We shall thus be able to settle everything with them in perfect peace and harmony. I shall give them a few years reprieve. Why should we quarrel? They will swallow anything in order to keep their material advantages. Matters will never come to a head. They will recognise a firm will, and we need only show them once or twice who is the master. They will know which way the wind blows"
    [Adolf Hitler quoted in 'The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany' by Guenter Lewy ]

    To do the services under the terms the state imposes ,if it goes against the church's values ,is a deal with the devil.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #77

    Feb 8, 2012, 05:13 AM
    The Church has been dealing with the devil for two thousand years, this is why you don't hear them mention him often
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #78

    Feb 8, 2012, 07:30 AM
    Like I said, once you get the church out of the 'business' of helping people, you're not going to like it much. I can hear it now, "if only we hadn't forced the church to stop feeding people, clothing people, providing health care, helping out in disasters, ministering to prisoners, taking care of orphans and abused women..."

    Be careful what you ask for. I'm just sayin'...
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #79

    Feb 8, 2012, 07:31 AM
    They have been dealing with this issue for so long that an exemption is inevitable. Case closed. Its all over except the shouting, and 98% of catholic women will continue to get their contraceptions, as they have all along. The poor catholics can still go to planned parent hood, like they have been doing. To bad the repubs are on the wrong side of women's health issues. Well the ones who are running for president anyway. I just can't see repubs females voting for some one that takes away the pill, or makes it hard to get.

    Obviously nobody listens to the celibate old guy who protect pedophiles.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #80

    Feb 8, 2012, 07:33 AM
    Who the hell is trying to take away the pill? Come on Tal, get real.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Should churches apply for 501c3? [ 2 Answers ]

LBJ's Conspiracy To Silence the Churches of America Most churches in America have organized as "incorporated 501c3 tax-exempt religious organizations." This is a fairly recent trend that has only been going on for about fifty years. Churches were only added to section 501c3 of the tax code in...

Protestant Churches [ 3 Answers ]

Hey guys I need help on my history homework. Can Someone give me 5 facts about a 16th century protestant church?? My Homework is due tomorrow so I need an answer fairly quickly. Miley x x x


View more questions Search