 |
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 26, 2007, 04:31 PM
|
|
I heard the same mis-reported story on a ClearChannel station.
... but will we hear the left wing media complaining about that?
No, of course not, since ClearChannel is one of their own.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 26, 2007, 04:41 PM
|
|
You know what's sad is that
People really believe that stuff, and why shouldn't they,
It's coming from us... right? WRONG!
The real terror is the senseless BS reports and stories being thrown around...
The false ones that make people frightened... like we don't have enough to worry about.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 02:34 AM
|
|
It's worse on the blogsphere . Someone did a c/p on a CNN story about the blaze and created a bogus report that MEChA (”Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan”) claimed responsibility . Here is the bogus link
Separatists claim responsibility for California wildfires - CNN.com
Here is the real CNN link
Fire chief: 25,000-acre blaze was set - CNN.com
If there was any truth to either of these claims (al Qaeda or MEChA) I would've been the first to post it.
But there is some plausibility to the alQaeda threat .The fact is that there was a detainee that discussed the idea of setting fires .Just because it did not go down as he described doesn't mean that a similar plan wasn't in the works.
Certainly the FBI report makes it clear that an alQaeda detainee had at least pondered the possibility. And it is a fact that there is a hunt for suspected arsonists related to this series of fires. At least one has already been shot and killed in a high speed chase. Arsonists blamed for starting California wildfires - Times Online
Steve Doocy was not reporting it as news but brought it up as speculation in a discussion format. I wonder if Raw Story reports every time the anchors of the dinosaur media raise speculation as legitimate news ? I kind of doubt it.
I also kind of doubt that they reported that Randi Rhodes-kill speculated that Blackwater deliberately set the blazes . Audio: Randi Rhodes: Blackwater Started The Fires? : Ian Schwartz
In her defense ;it could be the pain killers she is taking because of the header she took after her night of binge drinking... or it could be the DTs . I'm only speculating .
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 03:11 AM
|
|
I heard Al Qaeda causes night to fall
The Raw Story | Olbermann: 'I heard Al Qaeda causes night to fall'
MSNBC host Keith Olbermann says the realistic threat of terrorism is being so overstated by the Bush administration -- and in turn, by Fox News -- that it's downright funny.
"What happens when the culture of fear begins to inspire not terror or outrage, but laughter?" asked Olbermann. "Am I being too optimistic, or has giggling now passed paranoia in response to the president and these macabre parrots working at Fox?"
Olbermann cited a report yesterday carried by Fox News which suggested that Al Qaeda may be the true culprit behind the rash of recent California wildfires. Basing their coverage on an article it said ran "five days ago" in the Arizona Republic, the Fox and Friends morning program discussed an FBI memo stating that an Al Qaeda detainee had brought up the possibility of such a plan.
Calling the report "almost all wrong," the host took the network to task for grossly misreporting the age of the memo:
"The memo was reported not...five days ago, but six days ago -- plus 1,560 more days ago," said Olbermann. "The memo is from July 11, 2003. The Arizona Republic is a newspaper. Congratulations, Fox. But it has not been carrying the story...the guy who reported it doesn't even work there anymore."
Later in the program, Olbermann made up his own terror rumor about Al Qaeda's far-reaching powers:
"I heard Al Qaeda causes night to fall," he warned.
Air America radio host Rachel Maddow, a guest during the segment, said reports like Fox's helped to aid a White House that profited from fear.
"They have to come up with superhuman powers for Al Qaeda because they want to use Al Qaeda to justify a super-extreme agenda for the United States of America," said Maddow of the Bush administration.
Citing controversial intelligence techniques and possible military action against Iran she described as a "radical agenda," Maddow said the administration required a "really radical justification for it...they've had to elevate this band of death-cult fundamentalist criminals into a threat that is greater to our country than the Soviet Union ever was."
"And because it's about such serious stuff," she concluded, "I feel a little guilty thinking that it's funny."
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 07:21 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
it's worse on the blogsphere . Someone did a c/p on a CNN story about the blaze and created a bogus report that MEChA (”Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan”) claimed responsibility . Here is the bogus link
Separatists claim responsibility for California wildfires - CNN.com
Here is the real CNN link
Fire chief: 25,000-acre blaze was set - CNN.com
If there was any truth to either of these claims (al Qaeda or MEChA) I would've been the first to post it.
But there is some plausibility to the alQaeda threat .The fact is that there was a detainee that discussed the idea of setting fires .Just because it did not go down as he described doesn't mean that a simular plan wasn't in the works.
Certainly the FBI report makes it clear that an alQaeda detainee had at least pondered the possibility. And it is a fact that there is a hunt for suspected arsonists related to this series of fires. At least one has already been shot and killed in a high speed chase. Arsonists blamed for starting California wildfires - Times Online
Steve Doocy was not reporting it as news but brought it up as speculation in a discussion format. I wonder if Raw Story reports every time the anchors of the dinosaur media raise speculation as legitimate news ? I kinda doubt it.
I also kinda doubt that they reported that Randi Rhodes-kill speculated that Blackwater deliberately set the blazes . Audio: Randi Rhodes: Blackwater Started The Fires? : Ian Schwartz
In her defense ;it could be the pain killers she is taking because of the header she took after her night of binge drinking ........or it could be the DTs . I'm only speculating .
Most of these wildfires gives some nut the idea of setting another one; it seems the dry season every year we experience the same thing.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 07:30 AM
|
|
I think it telling that Keith Olberman (the real life Howard Beal) would interview an Air America personality about the Fox News speculations and not bring up the Rhandi Rhodes rant or the fact that another Air America personalityMike Malloy made the speculation that it was a member of "the Bush crime family " that started the fires. YouTube - Now Malloy Says Bush Family Set The Fires!
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 07:39 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
I think it telling that Keith Olberman (the real life Howard Beal) would interview an Air America personality about the Fox News speculations and not bring up the Rhandi Rhodes rant or the fact that another Air America personalityMike Malloy made the speculation that it was a member of "the Bush crime family " that started the fires. YouTube - Now Malloy Says Bush Family Set The Fires!
Too funny; thanks for the link; what some people won’t do. I guess it’s normal for people to speculate when confronted with something they don’t understand…but this takes the cake.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 07:46 AM
|
|
Governing by fear and uncertainty has been a policy for years.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 07:51 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Governing by fear and uncertainty has been a policy for years.
What is scary is the request for $88 million to modify B2 stealth bombers so that they can carry a 30,000lb bomb called the massive ordnance penetrator. The MOP is an advanced form of a "bunker buster", an air-delivered weapon with an explosive capacity to destroy targets deep underground. Explaining the request, the Administration says it is in response to an "urgent operational need from theatre commanders". What kind of emergency could that be? Well, how about to use in our war with Iran.:D
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 08:47 AM
|
|
I thought they already had those for Afghanistan to ferret out that cave dweller that masterminded the twin tower attacks?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 09:35 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
I thought they already had those for Afghanistan to ferret out that cave dweller that masterminded the twin tower attacks?
Apparently the capability is not on the B2 stealth bombers to carry them; part of the funds Bush is now asking for to continue the war would be to fit the B2. It’s a contingency measure should we want to use them against Iran; which apparently is going to be necessary sooner or later.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 02:09 PM
|
|
The 'terrorists' are the environmentalists because they will not allow them to clear out the dry dead brush with controlled burns or spray the beetles that kill the wood. So then the fire has more kindling wood to fuel a bigger fire and then the Santa Anna wind tunnel effect catches up the fire and look what happens.
They did say on the news that there was something written a few years back on terrorists
Planning to burn California, sort of like the story of how they want to blow up 13 major cities
Simultaneously. But this was a bad case of the yearly fires they get.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 02:14 PM
|
|
So are you suggesting that there was no arson involved whatsoever? That all of these fires were purely accidental? Don't be so quick to rule out that possibility. Maybe not necessarily al Qaeda but domestic terrorism is always a threat as well.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 27, 2007, 07:26 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by s_cianci
So are you suggesting that there was no arson involved whatsoever? That all of these fires were purely accidental? Don't be so quick to rule out that possibility. Maybe not necessarily al Qaeda but domestic terrorism is always a threat as well.
You are right they have already arrested someone for setting one of the fires in San Diego and they believe at least one to three more may have been arson.
But I think DC is talking about 'terrorist' plot, not some copy cat arsons that just happened to decide to add to the other fires. They said the original fire was caused by wind knocking over a pole.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 28, 2007, 04:35 AM
|
|
Hello:
14 people attacked us. 14 people. Only 14 people... They were ALL Saudi's. Now we're at war with Iraq, Afghanistan, and looking to go into Iran.
But the terrorists are in Pakistan?? I don't get it. I thought you were either with us or against us. Wassa matter with George?? Is he a liar?? Is he chicken?? Is he confused? Is he just stupid?? Is he leading us to our DESTRUCTION??
excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 28, 2007, 04:18 PM
|
|
Talk about paranoia!!
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 28, 2007, 10:33 PM
|
|
That's not paranoia Skell. That is the truth. Did you see that photo of bush holding the hand of King Fahd? The day after the towers came down, all of Osama Bin Laudins relatives were allowed to fly out of the US.
|
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Oct 29, 2007, 06:51 AM
|
|
First of all, there is NO evidence to link Al Qaeda to the forest fires in CA.
There is information that was passed to our intelligence agencies from Israeli intelligence that there were terrorists who had been planning to use forest fires to weaken our infrastructure, force us to use resources, and generally weaken us for some other form of attack. That does not mean that these fires constitute such an attack by any terrorist group, just that someone along the line had such an idea.
There is evidence that at least 5 of the fires wetre a result of arson. But there is nothing that connects that arson to terrorism or any terrorist group.
Finally, most terrorist groups like to claim responsibility for their attacks because they want people to be afraid of them and to think that they could attack anywhere, at any time with impunity. Nobody has taken any credit for these fires. When terrorist groups have set forrest fires in Israel (not an uncommon form of attack in that part of the world), they generally take credit for the attacks. There is no reason to believe that they would not do so in California. Since nobody has taken such credit, it is hard to believe that the California fires have any connection to terrorism.
Barring any new in evidence, my opinion is that the CA fires are not terrorism-related. Any attempt to make such a link would be premature.
Elliot
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 29, 2007, 03:12 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by magprob
That's not paranoia Skell. That is the truth. Did you see that photo of bush holding the hand of King Fahd? The day after the towers came down, all of Osama Bin Laudins relatives were allowed to fly out of the US.
Maybe that's why down under here we call them Bush fires... Hmmmm...
I think you call them forest fires... Perhaps our terminology is more relevant!! ;)
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Precise solution against terrorism
[ 12 Answers ]
What and how can we do somethiing, very innovative, sensible, diplomatic and politically correct, to eradicate terrorism from all across the world ?
Trying to find a link
[ 2 Answers ]
This question is really for those who are familiar with neopets.com. I am trying to find a link to "jellyworld" I know there is a username that has the link in their shop, but I have forgotten the username. The link the site shows in the cellblock game does not work, I would like to know how to...
The nature of terrorism
[ 13 Answers ]
In January 2006, I answered a question on another Q&A board about the nature and causes of terrorism. Here is the original Q&A:
However, in the wake of the attempted UK car bombings, I am forced to review this answer. Clearly the doctors in charge of the plot were not economically...
View more questions
Search
|