Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    terryg752's Avatar
    terryg752 Posts: 197, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #1

    Oct 3, 2007, 04:26 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.yet
    Statutes of Limitations on Debt Collection:

    Are you being hounded by a debt collector for an old debt you thought was written off years ago? If so, it is likely you are being contacted by a scavenger debt collector, which is a company that purchases older, mostly uncollectible debt for a tiny fraction of its value. Scavenger debt collectors are notorious for using illegal and unethical methods to collect "time-barred" debt.

    You do not have to pay debt that is considered too old by your state. Every state has laws governing the time in which a person or entity can file suit to collect a debt. Generally, a creditor or debt collector gives up his right to file suit to collect a debt after a period of six years from the time the debt was written off (or the date of last activity on your credit report), but various states allow anywhere from 2 to 15 years to collect delinquent debt (see statutes of limitation table below).

    The purpose of these statutes of limitation is to bring some measure of fairness to the debtor so that he / she (1) will not have to worry about being sued for the rest of their lives; and (2) so that the debtor can properly defend himself with fresh evidence and witnesses, if any.

    This doesn't mean that a creditor cannot file suit against you after the statute of limitations has expired; however, if a creditor or debt collector does file suit, you can ask the judge to dismiss the suit on the grounds that the statute of limitations has expired. In fact, if the statute of limitations is about to run on debt you owe, don't be surprised if you suddenly hear from a collection agency threatening to sue if you don't pay immediately.

    If a debt collector contacts you regarding an old debt, do not admit that you owe the debt and do not agree to make any payments. Simply tell them that the "statute of limitations has run on this debt and do not contact me again". If they continue contacting you, send them a certified letter, return receipt requested, telling them not to contact you about the debt again. Remember -- DO NOT ADMIT THAT YOU OWE THE DEBT, DO NOT AGREE TO PAY THE DEBT, AND DO NOT AGREE TO SEND ANY MONEY TO THEM. If you do, then the statute of limitations might start running all over again, giving them the legal right to sue you.


    NOTE: Credit Cards are usually considered to be an OPEN ACCOUNT.

    LINK TO SOL BY STATE: (Thank you RickJ)
    Debt collection statute of limitations listed by state
    Hi Friends:

    Please advise in this regard whether and how the legal docrine of Laches is applicable.

    If yes, the docrine would apply even if Statue of Limitation does not help?

    Thanks

    Terry

    {moved to own thread-<>}
    mr.yet's Avatar
    mr.yet Posts: 1,725, Reputation: 176
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    Oct 4, 2007, 03:59 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by terryg752
    Hi Friends:

    Please advise in this regard whether and how the legal docrine of Laches is applicable.

    If yes, the docrine would apply even if Statue of Limitation does not help?

    Thanks

    Terry

    Yes that is correct.

    LACHES, DOCTRINE OF - Based on the maxim that equity aids the vigilant and not those who procrastinate regarding their rights; Neglect to assert a right or claim that, together with lapse of time and other circumstances, prejudices an adverse party. Neglecting to do what should or could, have been done to assert a claim or right for an unreasonable and unjustified time causing disadvantage to another.

    Laches is similar to 'statute of limitations' except is equitable rather than statutory and is a common affirmative defense raised in civil actions.

    Laches is derived from the French 'lecher' and is nearly synonymous with negligence.

    In general, when a party has been guilty of laches in enforcing his right by great delay and lapse of time, this circumstance will at common law prejudice and sometimes operate in bar of a remedy which is discretionary for the court to afford. In courts of equity delay will also generally be prejudicial.

    But laches may be excused from ignorance of the party's rights; from the obscurity of the transaction; by the pendency of a suit, and; where the party labors under a legal disability, as insanity, infancy and the like.
    terryg752's Avatar
    terryg752 Posts: 197, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #3

    Oct 4, 2007, 04:03 AM
    Hi Mr. Yet:

    Many thanks for your detailed advice.

    Terry

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Fairness doctrine [ 13 Answers ]

Since this has been mentioned so much recently, what's fair about the fairness doctrine? :cool:

The monroe doctrine [ 2 Answers ]

What is the message to latin america from the monroe doctrine?

Doctrine of Consideration [ 1 Answers ]

To which extent the doctrine of consideration remains a necessary element of English Law

Monroe doctrine [ 1 Answers ]

Under the monroe doctrine european powers were allowed to intervene in the affairs of independent countries in latin america? True or false?


View more questions Search