[jlisenbe]

You must be joking!

Nope.

I would save the life -- and emotional health -- of the woman.

Saving the woman's physical life is scarcely ever an issue. As to her emotional health, you'd do that by killing her unborn child? Yep...liberal dem, you are.

[Wondergirl]

Yep...liberal dem, you are.

Nope, a God-fearing PK who has been blessed with common sense, not cursed with fanaticism.

[jlisenbe]

You are a God fearing person who advocates for the killing of unborn children? That only makes sense in the world of liberal dems. You are fanatically in favor of abortion.

[Wondergirl]

You are a God fearing person who advocates for the killing of unborn children? That only makes sense in the world of liberal dems. You are fanatically in favor of abortion.

Read much? Understand any of it? I didn't think so.

WHO wants an abortion?
WHEN does she?
WHY does she?

[tomder55]

answer.... there is an inconvenience, so the option is to kill the kid.

[jlisenbe]

Read much? Understand any of it? I didn't think so.

An insulting comment, which you claim to oppose but clearly don't, establishes nothing other than your lack of answers. However, I will not run off and pout. I just stick with it.

WHO wants an abortion?
WHEN does she?
WHY does she?

A woman, though as a non-biologist, that term would hold no meaning for you.

When she is pregnant, though your non-biology background probably renders that term meaningless as well.

For a number of potential reasons. In most cases, Tom's answer is pretty much it, and she gets supported by "God-fearing" folk like you.

[Wondergirl]

answer.... there is an inconvenience, so the option is to kill the kid.

Inconvenience: raped by your uncle
Inconvenience: gang raped
Inconvenience: husband is verbally and physically abusive
Inconvenience: am menopausal, thought I was finished having babies
Inconvenience: a pregnancy will put my life at risk
Inconvenience: the fetus has a congenital disorder that guarantees hospital care and medication throughout its probably short life

An insulting comment, which you claim to oppose but clearly don't, establishes nothing other than your lack of answers. However, I will not run off and pout. I just stick with it.

A woman, though as a non-biologist, that term would hold no meaning for you.

When she is pregnant, though your non-biology background probably renders that term meaningless as well.

For a number of potential reasons. In most cases, Tom's answer is pretty much it, and she gets supported by "God-fearing" folk like you.

I was just tossing back at ya insults similar to the ones you throw at me. Why oh why can't you stick to answering the questions or at least challenging the ideas in them without beating up the questioner???

[jlisenbe]

You mean you were just doing what you claim to despise? Interesting bit of hypocrisy, eh?

Your attempts to justify killing children in cold blood fall far short.

By the way, can you be specific about these supposed insults I have hurled at you?

[Wondergirl]

Your attempts to justify killing children in cold blood fall far short.

Scenario: Susie, age 15, was raped by her brother's best friend. In about six weeks, not wanting to believe it, she realized she was pregnant. Now what?

[jlisenbe]

In your view, she should have the little inconvenience killed.

[Wondergirl]

In your view, she should have the little inconvenience killed.

Please answer my question.

[jlisenbe]

Why? You don't answer mine. Shouldn't it be a two way street?

For instance.

1. By the way, can you be specific about these supposed insults I have hurled at you?
2. As to her emotional health, you'd do that by killing her unborn child?
3. I've shown you this pic before to no avail, but it's worth trying again. Look like a living human to you? Look like it's worth protecting? This is 16 weeks.
4. This is 10 weeks. Eyes, nose, ears, beating heart, brain, hands, fingers, and toes all present. Look like a living human to you worth protecting?
5. Well, they are definitely human, and they are definitely alive, so what do you think?

The first time a fetus breathes is when it has left the mother's body, when it is born. That's when it becomes human, a living soul.

There is nothing in the Bible to support an idea like that. But at any rate, does that mean you are OK with an abortion a day or two previous to delivery?

[Wondergirl]

There is nothing in the Bible to support an idea like that. But at any rate, does that mean you are OK with an abortion a day or two previous to delivery?

Abortion is mentioned in the Bible.

That's EXTREMELY rare and means the mother will die if nothing is done.

[jlisenbe]

Rape is mentioned in the Bible. Does being mentioned make it ok?

What if a woman loses her job at 37 weeks and so changes her mind. You ok with an abortion then? Colorado specifically allows that. You ok with it?

[jlisenbe]

A fifteen year old raped and pregnant is also EXTREMELY rare and yet you used that as your example. Oh well.

[Wondergirl]

Rape is mentioned in the Bible. Does being mentioned make it ok?

Apparently so. Literalists believe if it's in there, it's okay.

What if a woman loses her job at 37 weeks and so changes her mind. You ok with an abortion then? Colorado specifically allows that. You ok with it?

Did you answer my question?

Scenario: Susie, age 15, was raped by her brother's best friend. In about six weeks, not wanting to believe it, she realized she was pregnant. Now what?

[jlisenbe]

No they don’t. That’s absurd and a ridiculous assertion.

in Susie’s case, the first step should be to execute the boy for rape. He is, after all, the only guilty party. You with me so far?

[Wondergirl]

No they don’t. That’s absurd and a ridiculous assertion.

in Susie’s case, the first step should be to execute the boy for rape. He is, after all, the only guilty party. You with me so far?

Have you been drinking?

[jlisenbe]

Ah. Another evasion. Predictable.

[Wondergirl]

Ah. Another evasion. Predictable.

You, my dear, refuse to answer my questions that were posted before yours.