Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    Kimystyle's Avatar
    Kimystyle Posts: 1, Reputation: 1
    New Member
     
    #1

    Aug 25, 2014, 02:14 PM
    Can DCFS and court use a mothers past against her in a court ruling
    I did reunification services with DCFS. I had 1 dirty test that took my son. I never used again. After 9 months of intensive treatment with 100 percent clean record, no trip ups. Everything they told me to do I DID to the fullest. The judge took all my parental rights away. He said because of my past. Is that legal?
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #2

    Aug 25, 2014, 03:02 PM
    Not only is it legal, but par for the course. 9 months may not be enough to convince anyone (depending on your past history, before DCFS), and a year is better. There is no hurry if you have a visitation schedule, or a family member has guardianship/custody.

    Are any of those condition present? If so you simply reapply after a year of being clean. So yes its completely legal to consider your entire history in deciding what's best for your children.

    What has your case worker said? I wish you luck with not only staying clean, but getting your life in order, and getting custody of your kids back.
    ScottGem's Avatar
    ScottGem Posts: 64,966, Reputation: 6056
    Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
     
    #3

    Aug 25, 2014, 03:24 PM
    I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble believing you are telling us the whole story. I find it hard to believe that your son was taken after one failed test. Plus the fact that you were being tested indicates there were some issues before you had to submit to testing. I also find it hard to believe a judge would take all your rights away if you had followed everything for 9 months. He might not have reunited you over past history with only 9 months of experience. But I can't see him taking away what rights you had if you were showing progress. So I suspect there is something more to this story.

    But to answer your question, yes the court can and should take your past history into account when ruling in a case like this.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

I heard the supreme court made a ruling that the court can't stop you from drinking [ 5 Answers ]

L heard the supreme court ruled they can't keep you from going in a bar drinking that wasn't your offense your offense was driving after drinking and liquor is legal

What is the result of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda vs. Arizona? [ 6 Answers ]

This was a multiple choice question, and I can't decide which is the correct answer because I'm unsure about the voluntary part in the first choice. And I don't know if the court can dismiss the case.. a. If a defendant is not read his or her rights upon arrest, a confession cannot be used in...

Appeal of Small Claims Court Ruling [ 11 Answers ]

Before my daughter moved out of her apartment she gave the landlord 30 days written and oral notice. In the move she lost her copy of the notice. The landlord did a walk through and approved it, never mentioning that there was any problem, but he didn't return her security deposit or give her any...

New Supreme Court ruling [ 1 Answers ]

The Supreme Court has ruled that there can be no Nativity scene at the United States Capitol this year. This isn't for any religious reason, though. Simply put, they have not been able to find Three Wise Men and a Virgin in the Nation's capitol. However, there was no problem finding...


View more questions Search