Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #581

    Nov 19, 2013, 07:35 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    Did you hear what Cher said about Palin ?
    No, but I noticed Alec "I love gay people" Baldwin was again firing off homophobic slurs and Education Secretary Arne Duncan insulting "white suburban moms." Do tell what Cher said.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #582

    Nov 19, 2013, 07:37 AM
    Hello again, Steve:
    I have never said I supported an invasive procedure, but again which law makes it mandatory?
    Your party's WAR on WOMEN doesn't need your approval. That you vehemently DENY participation in that aspect of the war, looks like you AGREE that there's a war.

    Uhhhh... Which laws make it mandatory?? ALL of 'em. Here's what Wisconsin is doing.
    The language of Wisconsin Senate bill is an example of how they imbed the transvaginal probe while claiming you have a choice, “An ultrasound on the pregnant woman using whichever transducer the woman chooses; provide a simultaneous oral explanation during the ultrasound including the number of unborn children and presence and location of the unborn child; display the ultrasound images so that the pregnant woman may view them; provide a medical description of the ultrasound images including the dimensions of the unborn child and a description of any viewable external features and internal organs of the unborn child; and provide a means for the pregnant woman to visualize any fetal heartbeat, in a quality consistent with current medical practice, and a simultaneous oral explanation of the visual display of the heartbeat in a manner understandable to a layperson (ultrasound requirements).”

    Hint: In order to achieve most of that with the “quality consistent with current medical practice”, a transvaginal ultrasound must be used. Oh, but they didn't SAY vaginal probe. Republicans learned after the Virginia debacle. They found a new way to mandate vaginal ultrasounds without saying it.
    Excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #583

    Nov 19, 2013, 07:44 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:
    Couple things. Your party's WAR on WOMEN doesn't need your approval. In fact, that you vehemently DENY participation in that aspect of the war, looks like you AGREE that there's, INDEED, a war on women.
    There is a war on women and it's waged by your side.

    Uhhhh... Which laws make it mandatory?? ALL of 'em.Here's what Wisconsin is doing.
    Yeah that's some pretty good spin there. Meanwhile, all I hear is crickets chirping when I mention the life of the child or protecting women from people like the butcher of Philadelphia.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #584

    Nov 19, 2013, 08:42 AM
    the life of the child or protecting women from people like the butcher of Philadelphia
    Who doesn't want to protect women from that butcher, or care about the life of child?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #585

    Nov 19, 2013, 01:00 PM
    And by the way, women apparently aren't too impressed with the Obamacare "hosurance" ads. Leave it to people who think we're waging a war on women to come up with that piece of work.

    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #586

    Nov 20, 2013, 05:30 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Who doesn't want to protect women from that butcher, or care about the life of child?
    Planned Parenthood. They are suing to stop Texas from enforcing regulations to protect women having abortions. SCOTUS weighed in yesterday.

    Abortion Curbs in Texas Allowed by Divided U.S. Supreme Court - Businessweek
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #587

    Nov 20, 2013, 05:42 AM
    Planned Parenthood.
    Wrong.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #588

    Nov 20, 2013, 06:03 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Wrong.
    They didn't protect my daughter's emotional health or my grandchild.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #589

    Nov 20, 2013, 06:25 AM
    One case does not a policy make.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #590

    Nov 20, 2013, 06:27 AM
    One case? How many millions of abortions since Roe v. Wade?
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #591

    Nov 20, 2013, 06:36 AM
    That's the choice of the women.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #592

    Nov 20, 2013, 06:45 AM
    PP set themselves up as the guardian angel of women, they are not protecting the whole woman. They were silent during Gosnell's reign of terror and in fact enabled him. They were not on the front lines ensuring that never happens again, they were covering their a$$es. And now they are fighting regulations that would prevent just such another atrocity. They don't get a pass and it does not just boil down to"choice." Lives are at stake.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #593

    Nov 20, 2013, 06:53 AM
    Doesn't matter how many abortions have been performed if they were legal abortions. Women have a right to them. Of course you may not agree but it's their choice. Women want that choice and well to do females exercise it with no problem.

    Its just the lower incomes that are adversely affected, made worse in Texas by not expanding Medicaid. So such selective control over reproductive health care actually takes choice and options from already cash strapped females.

    What's bogus is the admitting privilege requirement that hospitals only give to doctors that actually admit patience as rarely does an abortion lend itself to a hospital visit, and the cost to hospitals isn't worth it since they bring no new customers to offset the costs of those rare visits. But you knew that and closing PP, and other clinics was the plan since Perry's sister is has her own clinics she is a part of to take up the slack. I know you said that was debunked, but offered no link to it.

    I am sorry for your daughter, but she is exactly the demographic most affected by failing to expand Medicare, single with no kids, and little or no income. It's state governments not the feds you should direct your anger and outrage to, and in Texas the county hospitals which run their own health care.

    Think about it, one in four uninsured people just in Texas. To poor to buy,and not poor enough to qualify for help. UNNACCEPTABLE!! Makes no sense to make the good pay for what the bad have done no matter how the intentions. The locals dropped the ball in PA, but what's the excuse right here in our state? How does that help the females who have more needs than an abortion, but no insurance and no money?
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #594

    Nov 20, 2013, 06:56 AM
    PP set themselves up as the guardian angel of women
    Premise fail.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #595

    Nov 20, 2013, 07:15 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Premise fail.
    Dude, I should know better than to get in an argument with an unarmed man.

    Planned Parenthood is the nation’s leading sexual and reproductive health care provider and advocate.

    For nearly 100 years, we’ve worked to improve women’s health and safety,
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #596

    Nov 20, 2013, 07:21 AM
    General Health Care

    Planned Parenthood health centers around the country offer you the health care you need. Our caring and knowledgeable staff provide a wide range of services. Many health centers provide general health care.
    Yeah makes sense to shut it down because 3% of its business is abortions. That's blind ideology.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #597

    Nov 20, 2013, 07:33 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Doesn't matter how many abortions have been performed if they were legal abortions. Women have a right to them. Of course you may not agree but it's their choice. Women want that choice and well to do females exercise it with no problem.
    It DOES matter and is relevant to NK's argument, "One case does not a policy make."

    "Roughly 50 million legal induced abortions have been performed in the United States" since 1973. He apparently thinks my daughter is the only one thrown under the bus and scarred for life.

    Its just the lower incomes that are adversely affected, made worse in Texas by not expanding Medicaid. So such selective control over reproductive health care actually takes choice and options from already cash strapped females.
    In light of the Obamacare promises to lower our healthcare costs I think you should spare us the cost argument.

    What's bogus is the admitting privilege requirement that hospitals only give to doctors that actually admit patience as rarely does an abortion lend itself to a hospital visit, and the cost to hospitals isn't worth it since they bring no new customers to offset the costs of those rare visits. But you knew that and closing PP, and other clinics was the plan since Perry's sister is has her own clinics she is a part of to take up the slack. I know you said that was debunked, but offered no link to it.
    The charge is the bill was designed to help his sister profit, which is pathetically stupid. She is a partner in a surgical group, and most surgical groups are not geared toward abortion - particularly those steered to her by a bill you guys call a TRAP law.

    Perry’s sister an advocate for surgical centers - Texas Politics

    One of the controversial tenets of the abortion restriction bill would require all abortions to be performed in ambulatory surgical centers, which are a distinct type of healthcare facility set up for outpatient surgeries. Abortion rights advocates say the new requirement would force many clinics to close because they wouldn’t be able to afford to upgrade their facilities. They also say the upgrades are unnecessary and that no data shows current clinics aren’t properly equipped to provide good care.

    If the bill passes, only five Texas abortion clinics would remain open — those that are already equipped as ambulatory surgical centers, advocates say. But a question remains: would the 420 other ambulatory surgical centers that exist in Texas begin performing the operation? Abortion rights advocates predict that the demand for the procedure won’t disappear with passage of the law.

    One company that will be faced with that decision is United Surgical Partners International, based in Addison, TX. Their vice-president of government affairs is Milla Perry Jones, Gov. Rick Perry’s sister. She is also on the board of the Texas Ambulatory Surgical Center Society. It should be noted that the legislation now under consideration by the Texas Legislature is patterned after proposals that have been adopted in other states, so it did not originate with Gov. Perry’s office. Rich Parsons, a Perry spokesman said he could not say whether Perry has discussed the legislation with his sister, but said, “he strongly supports protecting women’s health by raising the standard of care they receive at abortion clinics.”
    I am sorry for your daughter, but she is exactly the demographic most affected by failing to expand Medicare, single with no kids, and little or no income. It's state governments not the feds you should direct your anger and outrage to, and in Texas the county hospitals which run their own health care.
    Spare me, PP has no regard for women, children or the law.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #598

    Nov 20, 2013, 07:34 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    General Health Care



    Yeah makes sense to shut it down because 3% of its business is abortions. That's blind ideology.
    Dude, you really don't want to argue about PP and ideology do you?
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #599

    Nov 20, 2013, 07:38 AM
    Planned Parenthood is the nation’s leading sexual and reproductive health care provider and advocate.

    For nearly 100 years, we’ve worked to improve women’s health and safety,
    I don't see where it says that they are "the guardian angel of women".

    In the same vein that hospitals have misfortunes as well. Do you want to close them all down too?
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #600

    Nov 20, 2013, 07:43 AM
    Hello again, Steve:
    my daughter is the only one thrown under the bus and scarred for life.
    Nahhhh... You're perfectly willing to throw a poor pregnant single girl under the bus and SCAR her for life...

    There are NO winners in the abortion debate, your crocodile tears notwithstanding...

    excon

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

The war on women [ 1516 Answers ]

Hello: We've had post after post about this alleged war on women. The right wing says, what war? There's nothing going on here. Look over there. Then they accuse the Democrats of pitting women against men. They just want to talk about jobs... But, even after those discussion, the war on...

The war on women round II [ 20 Answers ]

U.S. drops the ball on women's rights - CNN.com It seems the US is indeed conducting a war on women which places it in the same league as the restrictive society of Iran, and why, because instead of acknowledging gains endorsed by most of the world, it is a hold out for some utopian view, what...

Obama's war on women [ 18 Answers ]

Why does Obama hate women? Add to that the fact that Obama doesn't care about real life issues women are facing such as gas and grocery prices instead of $9.00 contraceptives, and I'd say Obama is the one waging a war on women, not Republicans.


View more questions Search