Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #1061

    Nov 5, 2013, 10:17 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Just going by what Tom said. Bush lied, even though the previous supply side president was flexible enough to raise taxes when needed to cover his spending. That flexibility was not afforded to Bush one, and got you guys out of the WH.

    Now you guys are hollering liar to a promise by Obama that's 97% accurate, and trotting out horror stories of the 3% who have sticker shock and can't keep their plans because of insurance company policy, and state legislatures, even though it's well documented that those that cannot keep those plans have better options than they had before.

    But you guys have never been known to look deeper into things BEFORE you holler foul. If you did you would find that the lady in California will be getting into a bigger and better network of doctors going on the exchange than she had with her small carrier that withdrew from the private insurance market in California.

    I hope they report her solution as fast as they hollered about her distress.
    I guess the big difference was that GHW Bush had every intention of keeping his pledge to not raise taxes . Contrast that with the emperor ,who knew he was giving the American public a bald-faced lie .
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #1062

    Nov 5, 2013, 10:33 AM
    Hello again, tom:
    the big difference was that GHW Bush had every intention of keeping his pledge to not raise taxes . Contrast that with the emperor ,who knew he was giving the American public a bald-faced lie .
    That you believe you know the mind of either of these men is arrogant, to say the least.

    excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #1063

    Nov 5, 2013, 11:27 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, tom:
    That you believe you know the mind of either of these men is arrogant, to say the least.

    excon
    Oh no, it's quite clear that Obama was always full of sh*t. The evidence is beyond overwhelming, you of all people I wold have thought would acknowledge the lies by now.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #1064

    Nov 5, 2013, 11:38 AM
    It is a fact that the emperor knew that what he was telling us was a lie . Even NBC News has figured that out .
    Obama administration knew millions could not keep their health insurance - Investigations
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #1065

    Nov 5, 2013, 11:51 AM
    Yep, and yet another example of someone getting forced out of the crappy plan they liked and could afford into a much better, more affordable plan...

    Expecting parents being forced into new health plan now have a deductible 3Xs the amt of old, $10,000 #mycancellation pic.twitter.com/rlzoIptz1H

    It's enough to turn a lifelong Democrat into a Republican foot soldier.

    Canceled health insurance plans add to angst of change | Local News | The Seattle Times
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #1066

    Nov 5, 2013, 12:10 PM
    Everybody knew about the junk insurance market place and have for years. What do you think pre existing conditions, and the grandfather clause was all about?

    Please try and keep up and stop acting all indignant like it was a complete surprise.

    http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/nhwaiver.pdf

    New Hampshire's waiver application notes that four companies offer individual insurance
    policies in the state. One of these, Anthem, dominates the market with 72% of enrollees. Of the
    three smaller insurers, two met the medical spending requirements in 2009 and would not need to
    make changes under the new rule. The third company, junk insurer Chesapeake Life, reports a
    shockingly low medical loss ratio of just 43.6%, as adjusted under the federal formula.
    Although the application provides no details of the insurance policies sold by Chesapeake in
    New Hampshire, we can gain insight into its policies from its sister company, Mega Life and
    Health. Both are subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc, which sells through different insurers state
    by state, but offers similar products across these companies.
    Mega Life and Health sells low-benefit plans with no coverage for many benefits that are
    standard on comprehensive policies – including prescription drugs, maternity care, and even
    doctor visits unless the customer purchases a rider. The company's deductibles and out of pocket
    maximums, which on the surface seem similar to those in other policies, are also misleading
    because consumers are required to pay all costs that exceed daily or yearly caps on specific
    benefits. The story of Dana Christensen illustrates how such policies fail to protect their
    policyholders. Dana was left with $450,000 in medical bills when her husband Doug died of
    bone cancer. The couple had purchased a special chemotherapy rider with their Mega insurance
    policy, but the rider capped payments at $1,000 a day, while Doug's treatments were as much as
    $18,000 a day. (More on Dana Christensen and HealthMarkets' history of deception here:
    Dana Christensen's battle with junk health insurance | Consumer Watchdog)
    Consumers would probably be better off purchasing coverage from another company in the
    market if Chesapeake were to leave New Hampshire. (The company's extremely low medical
    loss ratio suggests it might, although the state's application doesn't provide any data to make the
    case.)
    What you think NH was the only one complaining about junk insurance and it just started? Why are you guys the last to know, and the least to understand. Why follow the Hannity/Fox example?
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #1067

    Nov 5, 2013, 12:12 PM
    That story appears no where else but on Twitter. Any other sources?
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #1068

    Nov 5, 2013, 12:19 PM
    Also:
    Inside the Fox News lie machine: I fact-checked Sean Hannity on Obamacare - Salon.com

    You'll notice some material that has been used here.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #1069

    Nov 5, 2013, 12:30 PM
    Canceled health insurance plans add to angst of change | Local News | The Seattle Times

    Great link.

    “It turned out not to be the case for most people with individual plans, because the plans were so much worse,” she said. “In all honestly, they didn't provide meaningful coverage.”

    The bare-bones plans left people vulnerable to costly medical bills and even bankruptcy. So insurance companies drafted new, more comprehensive plans to meet the law. Then they looked at a subscriber's current plan and tried to match it to one that most closely resembled one of the new plans.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #1070

    Nov 5, 2013, 01:12 PM
    Here's an idea and we can all be happy. You let us keep our old plans with a third lower premiums, copays, out of pockets, caps and deductibles, the doctors and hospitals we liked and you guys have the new super duper insurance.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #1071

    Nov 5, 2013, 01:14 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Here's an idea and we can all be happy. You let us keep our old plans with a third lower premiums, copays, out of pockets, caps and deductibles, the doctors and hospitals we liked and you guys have the new super duper insurance.
    What happens when you have to go to the hospital and have to have surgery and your inexpensive plan doesn't cover much of the expense? Or if Aunt Maude is in the same boat and has no savings but has to cough up $2500 as her deductible?
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #1072

    Nov 5, 2013, 01:25 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    What happens when you have to go to the hospital and have to have surgery and your inexpensive plan doesn't cover much of the expense? Or if Aunt Maude is in the same boat and has no savings but has to cough up $2500 as her deductible?
    She's lucky if her deductible is ONLY $2,500, thats pretty reasonible for a surgery even with a DAMN GOOD insurance.policy. I think I paid $1,600 out of pocket on my last one that was outpatient, (orthroscopic repair of rotator cuff) I went in and was heading home inside of 4 hours... I've been seeing cases of $10,000 deductible per year or higher with the new Obamacare quotes....
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #1073

    Nov 5, 2013, 02:49 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    What happens when you have to go to the hospital and have to have surgery and your inexpensive plan doesn't cover much of the expense? Or if Aunt Maude is in the same boat and has no savings but has to cough up $2500 as her deductible?
    No offense but what's it to you? It's my life and if the new crap sandwich is so good it should be an offer they can't refuse.

    Here's an idea and we can all be happy. You let us keep our old plans with a third lower premiums, copays, out of pockets, caps and deductibles, the doctors and hospitals we liked and you guys have the new super duper insurance.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #1074

    Nov 5, 2013, 02:57 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    No offense but what's it to you?
    Remember, "but" means disregard anything I've said before the "but."

    Are my tax dollars going to pick up any expense that you can't pay?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #1075

    Nov 5, 2013, 03:09 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    Remember, "but" means disregard anything I've said before the "but."
    Not true at all Carol.

    Are my tax dollars going to pick up any expense that you can't pay?
    I pay my bills and my risk to you is less if I don't have to pay a premium that costs 2-3 times more with the higher deductibles. There is no incentive to buy insurance if your risk of going broke is higher for buying it.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #1076

    Nov 5, 2013, 03:14 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Not true at all Carol.
    Yes, it is true. "I love you but...."
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #1077

    Nov 5, 2013, 03:22 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    Yes, it is true. "I love you but...."
    Oh good grief, it doesn't negate the sentiment. Only a woman...
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #1078

    Nov 5, 2013, 03:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Oh good grief, it doesn't negate the sentiment. Only a woman...
    Wow, the putdowns come fast and furious.

    Dr. Phil said it first.

    Everything before the but is a lie - Lawrence Fine
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #1079

    Nov 5, 2013, 03:29 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    Wow, the putdowns come fast and furious.

    Dr. Phil said it first.

    Everything before the but is a lie
    It's simple, I'm the one who said it and it was sincere, I did not want you take offense. So take it from me, not Dr. Phil, and maybe you can avoid goading people into unleashing snarky remarks.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #1080

    Nov 5, 2013, 03:31 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    It's simple, I'm the one who said it and it was sincere, I did not want you take offense. So take it from me, not Dr. Phil, and maybe you can avoid goading people into unleashing snarky remarks.
    I goaded you? You just couldn't help yourself?

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search


Check out some similar questions!

Health and social care - hazards in health & social care settings [ 10 Answers ]

Explain the potential hazards in health and social care settings, you should include: 1. hazards: e.g. from workinh environment, working condition, poor staffing training, poor working practices, equipment, substance etc. 2. working environment: e.g. within an organisation's premises 3....

Health care & home care [ 2 Answers ]

How do I set up health care & Home care agency?

Forget Hillary care, what about School-Based "Health Care?" [ 37 Answers ]

Middle school in Maine to offer birth control pills, patches to pupils When I was in school about the only good school "health care" was for was a bandaid, an excuse to skip a class or a pan to puke in. What on earth (or in the constitution) gives public schools the right to prescribe drugs...


View more questions Search