Check out some similar questions!

speechlesstx · Aug 14, 2013, 05:20 AM

It's come to this in the war on women, Hooters is taking a stand...

Hooters sign: Bob Filner won't be served

excon · Aug 14, 2013, 05:56 AM

Hello again, Steve:

Yeah, he's a turd. What do you think about scumbag Republican Senator Vitter? Do you give him a pass, like you accuse Democrats of doing? Or, are you going to argue that Vitter isn't as bad as Filner?? Probably.

excon

speechlesstx · Aug 14, 2013, 06:26 AM

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, Steve:

Yeah, he's a turd. What do you think about scumbag Republican Senator Vitter? Do you give him a pass, like you accuse Democrats of doing?? Or, are you gonna argue that Vitter isn't as bad as Filner??? Probably.

excon

We've been there already, I've never given any of them a pass. But let me ask you, do you believe paying a prostitute for sex is as bad as preying on your employees or worse, wounded female veterans as chairman of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee? One wounded his family, the other - like Weiner - is a menace to the public.

P.S. Vitter took responsibility for his actions, asked for forgiveness and has apparently kept his nose, or something, clean.

talaniman · Aug 14, 2013, 06:41 AM

If you haven't noticed no one is giving Filner a pass, no one. Matter of fact everybody is calling for his resignation, but he resists and the law is on his side. Just like that scumbag governor ultrasound in Virginia.

So be outraged, but stop the free pass spin. You are no more outraged than anyone else, but the law calls for due process.

speechlesstx · Aug 14, 2013, 06:51 AM

Did I say Filner was getting free pass? No, but what took you guys so long, this guy has obviously been doing this for years.

excon · Aug 14, 2013, 07:25 AM

Hello again, Steve:

But let me ask you, do you believe paying a prostitute for sex is as bad as preying on your employees or worse,

So, you want me to compare sh*t and tell you which one smells better. Well, I ain't going to do it.

Excon

speechlesstx · Aug 14, 2013, 07:37 AM

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, Steve:
So, you want me to compare sh*t and tell you which one smells better. Well, I ain't gonna do it.

excon

I remember the days of Clintoon, we were supposed to give him a break for getting a blow job in the oval office. But you want to crucify Vitter for paying a hooker and lump it into the same category as Filner using his position to prey on employees and vets who had already been sexual assault victims? Dude!

excon · Aug 14, 2013, 07:43 AM

Hello again, Steve:

I don't want to crucify anybody. I want to treat 'em ALL the same. If breaking the law is fine for a senator, then it oughta be fine for a mayor.

excon

speechlesstx · Aug 14, 2013, 07:50 AM

You know the statute of limitations passed in the Vitter case so whatcha going to do? But back to Clinton, his sin was perjury but you lefties tried to make it about sex so it's very confusing keeping up with where you guys stand on things.

talaniman · Aug 14, 2013, 09:02 AM

Correction we didn't just try, we did, and the senate agreed, and he went on to get elected AGAIN. Keep squealing.

speechlesstx · Aug 14, 2013, 09:45 AM

Originally Posted by talaniman

Correction we didn't just try, we did, and the senate agreed, and he went on to get elected AGAIN. Keep squealing.

As I recall the Senate voted on perjury and obstruction of justice charges, not a blow job - and he had already been reelected.

I'm referring to 'you,' as in blowhard libs everywhere mischaracterizing the impeachment as being about sex when it was about perjury and obstruction of justice. It's very difficult trying to understand when the law actually means anything to you lefties and when it doesn't but I understand, with you guys it always depends on which way the wind is blowing.

tomder55 · Aug 14, 2013, 09:51 AM

Originally Posted by talaniman

Correction we didn't just try, we did, and the senate agreed, and he went on to get elected AGAIN. Keep squealing.

For historical accuracy... Agreed ,you did try to make it about sex ;but there is nothing in the impeachment counts that mentions sex. Also he was impeached in his 2nd term ;not his 1st term . So no ;he was not elected again after impeachment .

talaniman · Aug 14, 2013, 11:17 AM

You are right he got re elected amid the scandal, and he is still going strong. So is Hillary.

tomder55 · Aug 14, 2013, 11:25 AM

Not according to the Slimes
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us...anted=all&_r=0
I wonder if the IRS did an audit ?

talaniman · Aug 14, 2013, 11:44 AM

I wouldn't underestimate the former first family.

tomder55 · Aug 14, 2013, 11:51 AM

She did such a fine job in 2008

speechlesstx · Aug 15, 2013, 02:23 PM

It's come to this on Bob "the filthy turd" Filner...

Great-grandmother Peggy Shannon accuses Mayor Bob Filner of sexual harassment - Shannon says mayor grabbed, kissed her

Before you go all "the Republican POLICY war on women is not the same as a Democrat pervert" on me let me state again, this was an employee. And, not only was Filner using his position to harass women that worked for him and female veteran victims of sexual assault as Chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, three separate female officials WARNED the San Diego Democratic party about him before they ran him for mayor.

The Democratic Party of San Diego needs better lawyers. Or rather, it should have used the lawyers it has.

In 2011, at least three women warned the head of the San Diego County Democratic Party of stories in the community about then-Rep. Bob Filner making inappropriate advances toward professional women with whom he'd come in contact through his political position.

Former California State Assemblywoman Lori Saldaña, San Diego County Democratic Central Committee member Martha Sullivan, and Escondido City Council member Olga Diaz all brought uncomfortable incidents to the attention of Jess Durfee, who was until the end of 2012 Democratic Party chairman for San Diego, the eighth-largest city in America.

What happened next illustrates the enormous challenge the situation presented to local Democrats, who were looking to Filner as their best shot at retaking the mayor's seat in the heavily Republican community for the first time since 1992. It also reveals the party's short-sighted and ultimately self-destructive failure to do due diligence on the accusations, which were presented to the party secondhand and yet failed to trigger any kind of substantive investigation, or even an intra-party conversation with a lawyer.

If sticking with your best chance at winning the office - knowing the guy could be big trouble - is more important than the women you're supposed to be protecting isn't a war on women I don't what is.

talaniman · Aug 15, 2013, 02:39 PM

I know what IS a war on women, putting obstacle in the way of them exercising their rights under the law to terminate a pregnancy allowed by that law. And then denying it's a war.

Filner is a pig!!

speechlesstx · Aug 15, 2013, 02:51 PM

Originally Posted by talaniman

I know what IS a war on women, putting obstacle in the way of them exercising their rights under the law to terminate a pregnancy allowed by that law. And then denying it's a war.

And yet a large portion of women are also anti-abortion, and a majority seem to support a ban at 20 weeks. Are they waging a war on themselves?

Dude, you know dam n well it isn't a war on women, it's fight for the life of the child. In our world, both sides live and in yours you choose who lives and who dies with the most innocent and helpless being the first victim. The second is quite often the mother tortured by killing her baby. I live with one of those women remember?

Filner is a pig!!

What part of the San Diego Democratic Party put their political interests ahead of the women they claim to represent and put this filthy pig out there to prey on them do you not get? They KNEW he was a pig and put him out there anyway.

talaniman · Aug 15, 2013, 03:21 PM

QUOTE by speechlesstx;
And yet a large portion of women are also anti-abortion, and a majority seem to support a ban at 20 weeks. Are they waging a war on themselves?

That all well and good as we have a right to our opinion but whatever you believe right or wrong others have a right to do what's best for them. To make decision about their own lives and you don't. So it doesn't matter who is on what side of the issue, they have a right to a choice and you taking it away.

The funny part of your war it's waged against poor females that can't fight you back, because well to do, and women of mean ignore you and do as they please, which makes you a BULLY!! And a hypocrite for refusing to take care of the females you deny the right of choice too.

Dude, you know dam n well it isn't a war on women, it's fight for the life of the child. In our world, both sides live and in yours you choose who lives and who dies with the most innocent and helpless being the first victim. The second is quite often the mother tortured by killing her baby. I live with one of those women remember?

I don't choose, a female makes her own choice whether you or I like it or not, NOT live by yours choice for her.

What part of the San Diego Democratic Party put their political interests ahead of the women they claim to represent and put this filthy pig out there to prey on them do you not get? They KNEW he was a pig and put him out there anyway.

No different than the republicans who do dirt, and still hold elective office.