 |
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 17, 2012, 02:11 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by califdadof3
Here is stand your ground in reverse. I think the officers should face jail time as well as the city have thier pants sued off of them.
Hello dad:
Don't hold your breath... You heard them justifying themselves.. He pointed a gun at a cop, they said.. OF COURSE he's going to get killed..
excon
|
|
 |
Internet Research Expert
|
|
Jul 17, 2012, 02:15 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by excon
Hello dad:
Don't hold your breath... You heard them justifying themselves.. He pointed a gun at a cop, they said.. OF COURSE he's gonna get killed..
excon
I know. What was he thinking?? Right ?
If they had indetified who it was at the door then I wouldn't be giving it a second thought. But the fact that they didn't do that and furthermore its not policy to do that innocent people are going to die.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
May 29, 2013, 07:38 PM
|
|
The courts will rule on the legalities, and Zimmerman can raise cash from it for his lawyers.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
May 29, 2013, 07:50 PM
|
|
Hello again, tom:
On Trayvon's cell phone is a video he took of his 2 friends giving a beat down to a homeless man.
Well, there you go.. That shows he needed killing..
Excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
May 29, 2013, 08:02 PM
|
|
Yep should be more of it
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
May 30, 2013, 05:39 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by excon
Hello again, tom:
Well, there ya go.. That shows he needed killing..
excon
It shows he isn't that angelic young man that the press tried to feed to us. It lends credence to Zimmerman's claim that he shot in self defense.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
May 30, 2013, 06:05 AM
|
|
Yeah, the young fool had no right to confront his stalker. It cost him his life. He profiled a young kid and stepped over his authority killed his victim. Case closed.
Hunting season for young black guys is open for white guys who have a right to bear arms. The right wing message is loud and clear. The kid was no angel, but neither was his killer.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
May 30, 2013, 06:16 AM
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
May 30, 2013, 06:35 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Yeah, the young fool had no right to confront his stalker. It cost him his life. He profiled a young kid and stepped over his authority killed his victim. Case closed.
Hunting season for young black guys is open for white guys who have a right to bear arms. The right wing message is loud and clear. The kid was no angel, but neither was his killer.
Can you guys be any more over the top? That was pathetic.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
May 31, 2013, 05:46 AM
|
|
Hello again,
So, no matter HOW this trial turns out, I'm NOT going to go out and destroy a few cars. But, I have the feeling that some people will. Do you have that feeling too?
excon
|
|
 |
Internet Research Expert
|
|
May 31, 2013, 01:14 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by excon
Hello again,
So, no matter HOW this trial turns out, I'm NOT gonna go out and destroy a few cars. But, I have the feeling that some people will. Do you have that feeling too?
excon
Im not so sure. I think its mostly going to depend on how the media shows it. Im not going to make bets its not going to happen but this isn't as cut and dry as some are trying to push it. I believe the evidence will speak for itself.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
May 31, 2013, 01:37 PM
|
|
I don't think this is LA 1992 ;at least I hope not.
|
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Jun 2, 2013, 05:13 PM
|
|
I sure wouldn't want to be a juror in this case, with most crimes in the news, I usually know which side I'm on by the end of the trial, for example I think O.J. Casey Anthony and Jodi Arias were guilty, but with this case I just don't know. Both Zimmerman and Martin may have been in the wrong, and it seems impossible to know who assaulted who first. It also appears that Martin wasn't as clean cut as his family portrays him, although the jury won't be allowed to hear details about his past.
|
|
 |
Internet Research Expert
|
|
Jul 14, 2013, 05:13 AM
|
|
Well now that the trial is over and the verdict in. We will be starting on stage 2 of this fiasco. I see the many groups including the NAACP calling for charges against Zimmerman for "racial profiling".
I guess not guilty isn't something they can tolerate. After all the media is trying to do to fuel the fire of race.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 14, 2013, 05:32 AM
|
|
Unlike them I defer to the jury. Seriously, Zimmerman had the deck stacked against him with the media, the race baiters like Sharpton, the NAACP, the DoJ and the president himself leading the way and they couldn't justify a conviction. It was a tragedy for sure but America is not about appeasing a segment of society and getting a preferred outcome, that isn't justice.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Jul 14, 2013, 05:39 AM
|
|
The criminal trail is over but the debate will rage on as racial profiling continues to be a hot topic in to many areas of the law and behavior. The debate is important because there are just to many similar cases that never receive the attention that this one did.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 14, 2013, 05:49 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
The criminal trail is over but the debate will rage on as racial profiling continues to be a hot topic in to many areas of the law and behavior. The debate is important because there are just to many similar cases that never receive the attention that this one did.
So you bought into the meme that this was a "white" guy profiling a black kid?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Jul 14, 2013, 06:33 AM
|
|
Odds are that the number of shootings this weekend in Chi-town will rival the Valentine's Day Massacre... in fact every weekend that is so.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Trayvon Martin
[ 103 Answers ]
Hello:
It USED to be, that self defense meant that you could use deadly force only IF you had NO means of escape. It was simple. It made sense. And, it was universally accepted. Then, at the urging of the NRA, SOME states passed laws that said you can kill somebody if he's attacking you by...
View more questions
Search
|