Check out some similar questions!

excon · Apr 30, 2013, 09:41 AM

Hello again, tom:

Your guy, George W. Bush said they HATE us because of our freedoms.. IF we THROW out all the Muslims and stop feeding our poor, the terrorists have won.

excon

tomder55 · Apr 30, 2013, 09:47 AM

And who said I wanted to kick out ALL the Muslims... who said I wanted to quit feeding the poor ? I gave very specific violations of existing law regarding immigration . I know you want open borders where everyone can come in unvetted and suck on the teet of the American taxpayer . In this specific case the lackluster enforcement of existing immigration law led directly and indirectly to the death of 3 people and the wounding of now over 200 on Patriots day.

speechlesstx · Apr 30, 2013, 10:18 AM

Bus was right, the Jihadists have admitted as much. Heck, having the wrong haircut will get you snatched, beaten and your head shaved in Gaza. How you can interpret any of this as plans or desires to "THROW out all the Muslims and stop feeding our poor" is beyond me, you're sounding awfully radical lately.

paraclete · May 1, 2013, 05:03 AM

Speech radical is all muslims understand, you have to be radical when dealing with them, it is simple they kill yours, you kill theirs, they will not judge you for it, because they know the law

tomder55 · May 1, 2013, 11:36 AM

Turns out the Ruskies weren't the only ones to warn us about Tamerlan Tsarnaev . The Saudis warned us based on "human intelligence developed independently in Yemen.”
The Saudis also denied him an entry visa in December 2011, when he hoped to make a pilgrimage to Mecca. He was even too radical for the Saudis! I have to say ,he appears to have been quite the world traveller for a welfare bum.
Saudi Arabian ambassador in Washington DENIES his nation warned the United States about Tamerlan Tsarnaev in 2012 | Mail Online

DHS is pulling a Sergeant Shultz on the Saudi warning .
Sargent Schultz - I know nothing, I am not here - I did not even get up this morning! - YouTube

speechlesstx · May 6, 2013, 06:30 AM

Seems no one wants the body of the bomber, not funeral homes, not cemeteries. Ex thinks we should force pharmacists to sell whatever he wants them to, should we force them take the body of a terrorist also?

tomder55 · May 6, 2013, 06:39 AM

He served a good purpose as a speed bump

Just a thought. I'd pay a pig farmer for a small plot on the farm. Money well spent.

smkanand · May 6, 2013, 11:39 AM

His body should be send to his relatives. If they accept it. Why there is no terror incident in Japan or I don't heard about it. Japanese have some policy.

smkanand · May 7, 2013, 10:20 AM

One suspect of Boston case got bail. How could he get bail? In such matter.

JudyKayTee · May 8, 2013, 01:18 PM

"one suspect of Boston case got bail. how could he get bail? in such matter."

Legally, why not?

tomder55 · May 8, 2013, 03:54 PM

He'll be confined to his mother's home and be required to wear an electronic monitoring device 24/7 while he awaits trial. He'll also have to post a $100,000 bond

Boston Marathon bomb suspect's friend to be released on bail
As of now ,he is not charged in a conspiracy to murder. I think it's a safe bet he isn't going nowhere.

paraclete · May 8, 2013, 08:27 PM

I wouldn't take that bet

smkanand · May 8, 2013, 11:48 PM

I thought there are different provision in law when it comes to terror.

tomder55 · May 9, 2013, 04:09 AM

Originally Posted by smkanand

I thought there are different provision in law when it comes to terror.

There are if the government chooses to employ them. The Obama adm avoids it unless it's absolutely unavoidable. As an example ,Major Hasan shot up Fort Hood shouting' Allahu Akbar!'until he was subdued. The administration classified the event as "workplace violence" .

paraclete · May 9, 2013, 05:16 AM

Yes terror demands suspension of rights

talaniman · May 9, 2013, 05:26 AM

Actually the civil courts have a much better record of convictions and jail than the alternative military gitmo process. Terrorist are nothing but glorified criminals anyway.

tomder55 · May 9, 2013, 05:33 AM

Criminals don't rob a liquer store because of some political ideology they are fighting for.

excon · May 9, 2013, 05:45 AM

Hello again, tom:

criminals don't rob a liquer store because of some political ideology they are fighting for.

I'm trying to remember which side of the hate crime debate you were on... Oh, that's right. I think you were on the side that didn't much CARE about what was in the mind of criminal when he committed his crime... Now, you do, huh?

Excon

talaniman · May 9, 2013, 06:00 AM

Originally Posted by tomder55

criminals don't rob a liquer store because of some political ideology they are fighting for.

And a nut job who commits mass murder is still a nut job no matter what he is hollering about. McVeigh or the Ft. Hood shooter. No difference to me.

tomder55 · May 9, 2013, 06:08 AM

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, tom:

I'm trying to remember which side of the hate crime debate you were on... Oh, that's right. I think you were on the side that didn't much CARE about what was in the mind of criminal when he committed his crime... Now, you do, huh?

excon

Completely irrelevant to the discussion because a terrorist attack is not a criminal activity .it is an act of war.