Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #201

    Dec 11, 2012, 03:30 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    One of Obama's green energy successes just went to....China.

    Chinese company buys battery maker that got recovery funds
    That's not Obama's fault.

    Why is the Massachusetts company bankrupt?***

    "Wanxiang's top executive and an Energy Department spokesman said last week that the point of the economic stimulus grant was to create jobs by building a Michigan manufacturing facility, which Wanxiang said it plans to keep open."

    "Wanxiang would not acquire A123's Ann Arbor, Mich.-based government business, which includes all of its U.S. military contracts. Those would be acquired for $2.25 million by Navitas Systems, a Woodridge, Ill.-based [minutes from Wondergirl] provider of energy storage products for commercial, industrial and government agency customers."

    ***ADDED "[A123's] financial stability has been in question for more than a year. The company suffered a major setback when it had to recall defective batteries in Fisker cars. And despite orders from carmakers, A123 could not generate sufficient revenue or profit from the slowly growing market for electric vehicles." (10/16/2012, NYT)
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #202

    Dec 11, 2012, 03:53 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    That's not Obama's fault.
    How much of that $133 million taxpayer dollars his administration gave them might we see returned?
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #203

    Dec 11, 2012, 04:00 PM
    How much of that $133 million taxpayer dollars his administration gave them might we see returned?
    Is that the standard procedure where a company receives grants and fails afterwards?
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #204

    Dec 11, 2012, 04:02 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    How much of that $133 million taxpayer dollars his administration gave them might we see returned?
    Why weren't you buying an electric car?
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #205

    Dec 11, 2012, 04:04 PM
    Just so you know I drove an electric car once, a very disconcerting experience
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #206

    Dec 11, 2012, 05:26 PM
    republican states have a history of doing the same thing. I think it has something to do with concentration of power in the hands of one person
    Nope it has more to do with Alexander Fraser Tytler's warning .
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #207

    Dec 11, 2012, 07:07 PM
    "A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

    From bondage to spiritual faith;
    From spiritual faith to great courage;
    From courage to liberty;
    From liberty to abundance;
    From abundance to selfishness;
    From selfishness to complacency;
    From complacency to apathy;
    From apathy to dependence;
    From dependence back into bondage."
    ~ Alexander Fraser Tytler
    Then according to his timetable you have run your course, although you might just have one or two steps to go
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #208

    Dec 12, 2012, 06:21 AM
    Yup ;apparently we are on the' from apathy to dependence' step.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #209

    Dec 12, 2012, 07:41 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    Why weren't you buying an electric car?
    Why would I want to waste $30,000?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #210

    Dec 13, 2012, 08:18 AM
    The National Counterterrorism Center now apparently has a "PreCrime" department, tasked with scouring data on you and me to prevent future crimes. They're even sharing it with foreign governments.

    Top U.S. intelligence officials gathered in the White House Situation Room in March to debate a controversial proposal. Counterterrorism officials wanted to create a government dragnet, sweeping up millions of records about U.S. citizens—even people suspected of no crime.

    Not everyone was on board. "This is a sea change in the way that the government interacts with the general public," Mary Ellen Callahan, chief privacy officer of the Department of Homeland Security, argued in the meeting, according to people familiar with the discussions.

    A week later, the attorney general signed the changes into effect.

    Through Freedom of Information Act requests and interviews with officials at numerous agencies, The Wall Street Journal has reconstructed the clash over the counterterrorism program within the administration of President Barack Obama. The debate was a confrontation between some who viewed it as a matter of efficiency—how long to keep data, for instance, or where it should be stored—and others who saw it as granting authority for unprecedented government surveillance of U.S. citizens.

    The rules now allow the little-known National Counterterrorism Center to examine the government files of U.S. citizens for possible criminal behavior, even if there is no reason to suspect them. That is a departure from past practice, which barred the agency from storing information about ordinary Americans unless a person was a terror suspect or related to an investigation.

    Now, NCTC can copy entire government databases—flight records, casino-employee lists, the names of Americans hosting foreign-exchange students and many others. The agency has new authority to keep data about innocent U.S. citizens for up to five years, and to analyze it for suspicious patterns of behavior. Previously, both were prohibited. Data about Americans "reasonably believed to constitute terrorism information" may be permanently retained.

    The changes also allow databases of U.S. civilian information to be given to foreign governments for analysis of their own. In effect, U.S. and foreign governments would be using the information to look for clues that people might commit future crimes.
    If only they had the Precogs. So now the Obama admin wants to track our every move. Is that a drone I hear?
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #211

    Dec 13, 2012, 08:42 AM
    Hello again, Steve:

    If only they had the Precogs. So now the Obama admin wants to track our every move. Is that a drone I hear?
    If George W. Bush would have PRESERVED our Fourth Amendment rights, there would be NO Obama spies today.

    You guys really DO suffer from memory loss. But, that's why I'm here.

    Excon

    PS> I suppose if he tortured somebody you'd come down on him hard, wouldn't you? Bwa, ha ha ha..
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #212

    Dec 13, 2012, 08:44 AM
    now apparently has a "PreCrime" department
    You've had that since 9/11. Your conversations and emails have been listened to since then.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #213

    Dec 13, 2012, 10:10 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:

    If George W. Bush would have PRESERVED our Fourth Amendment rights, there would be NO Obama spies today.

    You guys really DO suffer from memory loss. But, that's why I'm here.
    Nah, anyone could have predicted your response.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #214

    Dec 13, 2012, 10:14 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    You've had that since 9/11. Your conversations and emails have been listened to since then.
    This goes way, way, beyond scanning communications.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #215

    Dec 13, 2012, 10:32 AM
    So does the Patriot Act.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #216

    Dec 13, 2012, 10:48 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    So does the Patriot Act.
    This goes way, way beyond the Patriot Act (passed by Congress). The administration bypassed congress and gave itself unilateral authority to mine the data of innocent Americans and share it with other countries. The Patriot Act at least has some safeguards in place. They can't just wiretap any ol' American citizen, they still have to go through the courts.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #217

    Dec 13, 2012, 10:51 AM
    Wrong: Patriot Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Also the organization charged with it is Counterterrorism Center enacted under Bush.

    If you don't have anything to hide why are you worried?
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #218

    Dec 13, 2012, 11:20 AM
    And we all know that the biggest threat to the country is those right wing extremists in funny tri-cornered hats .
    (U//FOUO) DHS/I&A will be working with its state and local partners over the next several months to ascertain with greater regional specificity the rise in rightwing extremist activity in the United States, with a particular emphasis on the political, economic, and social factors that drive rightwing extremist radicalization.
    Homeland Security Report Warns Of Rising Right-Wing Extremism
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #219

    Dec 13, 2012, 12:01 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Wrong: Patriot Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Also the organization charged with it is Counterterrorism Center enacted under Bush.

    If you don't have anything to hide why are you worried?
    a) You didn't even read the Wikipedia article. You really should do such things before counting on something to prove me wrong. Read the section on Title II. The courts are still involved.

    b) "The National Counterterrorism Center" was the first four words of my post, which also noted "the attorney general signed the changes into effect." That would be Eric Holder, Obama's AG.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #220

    Dec 13, 2012, 03:27 PM
    I wonder how that new law mandating black boxes in all new autos fits in with the new Precogs ?
    Horace Cooper, an analyst with the National Center for Public Policy Research, writes in a recently published analysis that privacy are inevitable because "once the law goes into effect, the DOT will then act to tell us exactly what data the EDRs will collect and what devices can be used to access the data."
    Analyst worries auto black boxes invite privacy abuse by officials - National Cars | Examiner.com

    So just like Obamacare . They have to pass the law so we can find out what is in it.

    But is there a double standard here ? Well yes because while the adm is looking to know everything we do ;including how and where we drive ; they are still stonewalling on Benghazi .

    Congressman Jason Chaffetz said that he has been 'thwarted' by the State Department from seeing any Americans who survived the attack in Benghazi .He is talking about the 30 or so survivors who have disappeared off the face of the planet.

    My understanding is that we still have some people in the hospital. I'd like to visit with them and wish them nothing but the best but the State Department has seen it unfit for me to know who those people are—or even how many there are. I don't know who they are. I don't know where they live. I don't know what state they're from. I don't even know how many there are. It doesn't seem right to me.

    This is so patently different than any other experience I've had.
    Chaffetz: State Dept Hiding Benghazi Survivors

    Maybe the adm doesn't know what really happened in Benghazi (guffaw ) . Maybe if they used their data bases ,their black boxes ,their drones to keep tabs on our enemies instead of our driving habits...

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.



View more questions Search