Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    TUT317's Avatar
    TUT317 Posts: 657, Reputation: 76
    Senior Member
     
    #161

    Aug 10, 2012, 04:44 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    We have a pac blaming a guy for the death of a woman where none of the facts add up and a campaign outright lying about what they knew, but you and ex are more concerned about my signature because it may be "somewhat misleading"???

    Really???

    I think there are two different issues at work here.

    However, as far as the Ad in question is concerned I am of the opinion that it is unacceptable. This is regardless of whoever is prepared to accept responsibility.

    Tut
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #162

    Aug 10, 2012, 06:42 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    How does it affect them if they are doing charity work and not offering insurance?
    You must think everyone who works for a charity does so for free, like some magical money tree is going to make sure they feed their family.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #163

    Aug 10, 2012, 07:00 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    You must think everyone who works for a charity does so for free, like some magical money tree is going to make sure they feed their family.
    Most charities work by donations and volunteerism. Once it becomes a revenue-generating business it has to abide by business rules.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #164

    Aug 10, 2012, 07:31 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Most charities work by donations and volunteerism. Once it becomes a revenue-generating business it has to abide by business rules.
    When I interned at Catholic Charities for six months, it was considered a social services agency and thus a business. Social workers and counselors were paid employees with benefits including health insurance. There was a management hierarchy. I am guessing that is still the case.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #165

    Aug 10, 2012, 07:34 AM
    LOL, I find it interesting that church officials are hollering about religious freedom, while the workers are protesting draconian policies that are against the poor.

    Nuns on the Bus: 2700 Miles, Nine States, and a Rock Star DC Welcome | (A)theologies | Religion Dispatches

    I suspect, though I have no privileged evidence, that the real push for the nuns was a groundswell of support from Catholics and others who realize that it is past the time to listen passively to the bishops rant and rave about religious freedom while running roughshod over other people's rights. It is tricky business in the increasingly lay-led Church to put too much emphasis on any one group, especially the nuns on whom some people mistakenly confer a quasi-clerical status (nuns are consecrated to religious life, but are not clergy). But in this instance, the bus adventure captured many imaginations and functioned to demonstrate how the free exercise of religion can achieve many good ends for those who will bear the cost.
    A final important dimension of this improbable adventure was the outpouring of interfaith (and non-faith) respect and solidarity. All across the country, people who responded to the nuns on the bus came from a variety of traditions and no faith whatsoever. They seem to be attracted to the women's gumption to lace up their sensible shoes and get to the work of social change while caring for people in the process.
    Some holler, while others work. Which one gets the job done most effectively? The Catholic church should listen to the females of their faith.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #166

    Aug 10, 2012, 07:39 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    When I interned at Catholic Charities for six months, it was considered a social services agency and thus a business. Social workers and counselors were paid employees with benefits including health insurance. There was a management hierarchy. I am guessing that is still the case.
    Thanks for the info. Was the insurance company a separate company not affiliated with CC?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #167

    Aug 10, 2012, 07:42 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Most charities work by donations and volunteerism. Once it becomes a revenue-generating business it has to abide by business rules.
    Non-profit organizations have employees, too. And they don't work for free. Churches have employees, janitors, office personnel, maintenance guys - it's quite normal for the pastor to a be church employees.

    You don't have to be a revenue-generating business to be an employer, and being an employer doesn't negate your first amendment rights.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #168

    Aug 10, 2012, 07:44 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    When I interned at Catholic Charities for six months, it was considered a social services agency and thus a business. Social workers and counselors were paid employees with benefits including health insurance. There was a management hierarchy. I am guessing that is still the case.
    Like NK you omit the "non-profit" status which makes all the difference.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #169

    Aug 10, 2012, 07:48 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Some holler, while others work. Which one gets the job done most effectively? The Catholic church should listen to the females of their faith.
    Do you really want to go there again?

    World Vision

    And by the way, they're too busy working to help others to have time to draw attention to themselves with a bus tour.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #170

    Aug 10, 2012, 07:53 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    you omit the "non-profit" status which makes all the difference.
    Hello again, Steve:

    It makes NO difference whatsoever to the female employee who's ENTITLED to be treated equally with her male counterparts.. The church can't discriminate against women. It just can't...

    excon
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #171

    Aug 10, 2012, 07:54 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Thanks for the info. Was the insurance company a separate company not affiliated with CC?
    Unfortunately I wasn't a paid employee, so don't know the answer to that. I do know many of the employees were not Catholic and were young employed marrieds without children.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #172

    Aug 10, 2012, 07:54 AM
    And by the way, they're too busy working to help others to have time to draw attention to themselves with a bus tour.
    You are right, they should just go home and do as they are told. The hierarchy knows best, how dare they act as the spirit moves them to do.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #173

    Aug 10, 2012, 08:02 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by TUT317 View Post
    I think there are two different issues at work here.

    However, as far as the Ad in question is concerned I am of the opinion that it is unacceptable. This is regardless of whoever is prepared to accept responsibility.

    Tut
    Not really, the issue seems to be deception. You said my quotes were misleading even though I was merely pointing what I believe to an influence that led to the Obama we have today (and don't forget we only have six lines available for a signature). I say misleading is that ad.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #174

    Aug 10, 2012, 08:07 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    You are right, they should just go home and do as they are told. The hierarchy knows best, how dare they act as the spirit moves them to do.
    I don't care what the nuns do, that's between them, God and the church they agreed to serve. If they want to drive around on a bus drawing attention to themselves so they can have a "rock star" welcome in DC that's their business. The rest of us will go quietly about helping others.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #175

    Aug 10, 2012, 08:09 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    I say misleading is that ad.
    Hello again, Steve:

    Look. We ALL know that Romney causes cancer. But, if they LIVED in Massachusetts, they'd be alive... Is it the water up there?

    excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #176

    Aug 10, 2012, 08:30 AM
    I'm wondering what's in the water up your way.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #177

    Aug 10, 2012, 11:32 AM
    If the NUNS aren't listening to you guys, why should we?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #178

    Aug 10, 2012, 01:44 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    If the NUNS aren't listening to you guys, why should we?
    I don't recall telling the nuns anything.
    TUT317's Avatar
    TUT317 Posts: 657, Reputation: 76
    Senior Member
     
    #179

    Aug 11, 2012, 02:53 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Not really, the issue seems to be deception. You said my quotes were misleading even though I was merely pointing what I believe to an influence that led to the Obama we have today (and don't forget we only have six lines available for a signature). I say misleading is that ad.
    I believe a lot of things myself. The only problems is trying to prove these things.

    If we take a particular stance on an issue and this issue is up for public scrutiny then it is not unreasonable for the scrutineers to want evidence.


    Tut
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #180

    Aug 11, 2012, 04:44 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by TUT317 View Post
    I believe a lot of things myself. The only problems is trying to prove these things.

    If we take a particular stance on an issue and this issue is up for public scrutiny then it is not unreasonable for the scrutineers to want evidence.


    Tut
    Perfectly reasonable, but I can't make the entire connection in six lines.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.



View more questions Search