 |
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Aug 6, 2012, 02:18 PM
|
|
Does anyone know the Current Ratio well? Question below...
June Smith, a process engineer, has sold her 15-year patent for a new etching process to Silica
Labs, Inc. In return, she has received $500,000 in cash and, based on its value on the sale
date, $200,000 in common stock in Silica Labs. The stock is forecasted to double in market
value over the next two months.
Assuming that Silica Labs holds some long-term debt, which of the following describes the
effect of the transaction on Silica Labs?
A. Current ratio will decrease and total debt to equity ratio will increase
B. Current ratio will increase and total debt to equity ratio will increase
C. Current ratio will decrease and total debt to equity ratio will decrease
D. Current ratio will increase and total debt to equity ratio will decrease
***My answer: I am kind of lost on this one. I think I would narrow my choices down to the selections that have the current ratio increasing because I believe Silica labs is gaining an asset that costs 700k and only really paying 500k of assets so the current ratio would increase because current ratio = current assets/current liabilities.
Next I would choose the selection that would show the debt to equity ratio increasing. I think I am so far off on this and need help please!
|
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Aug 6, 2012, 03:17 PM
|
|
It's helpful to break it down by considering each component in isolation...
• The addition of the patent to the noncurrent assets on the balance sheet has no effect on current assets, current debt, equity, nor long-term debt.
• The payment of cash by Silica decreases current assets.
• The issuance of stock increases Silica's total equity.
Recap:
• Debiting the Patent onto the balance sheet affects neither ratio.
• Crediting Cash reduces the numerator of the current ratio.
• Crediting Stock increases the denominator of the debt : equity ratio.
Only one of the 4 answer choices corresponds to these effects.
Just for fun, can you see why they had to add the assumption that Silica has some LT debt outstanding?
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Aug 6, 2012, 03:24 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by ArcSine
It's helpful to break it down by considering each component in isolation...
• The addition of the patent to the noncurrent assets on the balance sheet has no effect on current assets, current debt, equity, nor long-term debt.
• The payment of cash by Silica decreases current assets.
• The issuance of stock increases Silica's total equity.
Recap:
• Debiting the Patent onto the balance sheet affects neither ratio.
• Crediting Cash reduces the numerator of the current ratio.
• Crediting Stock increases the denominator of the debt : equity ratio.
Only one of the 4 answer choices corresponds to these effects.
Just for fun, can you see why they had to add the assumption that Silica has some LT debt outstanding?
Ok, so because the numerator in the current ratio is decreased that would make the current ratio decrease as well. And then by increasing the denom of the debt/equity ration you are also decreasing the ratio. So tha answer would be C: current ratio will decrease and total debt to equity ratio will decrease! Correct?
|
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Aug 6, 2012, 03:35 PM
|
|
Quite correct... good job. I'd enjoy sticking and playing with the other questions, but other obligations are pressing.
The "just for fun" answer, though, is that with NO long-term debt outstanding, Silica's debt-to-equity ratio would be (0 / equity) = zero, which wouldn't change no matter what changes to the denominator might occur (other than going to zero itself, in which case the ratio would be undefined).
Take care, and best of success with the studies.
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Aug 6, 2012, 06:01 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by ArcSine
Quite correct...good job. I'd enjoy sticking and playing with the other questions, but other obligations are pressing.
The "just for fun" answer, though, is that with NO long-term debt outstanding, Silica's debt-to-equity ratio would be (0 / equity) = zero, which wouldn't change no matter what changes to the denominator might occur (other than going to zero itself, in which case the ratio would be undefined).
Take care, and best of success with the studies.
Ahhh, my apologies I never saw the just for fun question. That's interesting and I get it thanks for the extra lesson! :)
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Current Ratio & Acid-Test Ratio
[ 1 Answers ]
I know the formula for both ratios.
Current Ratio = current assets/current liabilities
Acid-Test Ratio = (Cash Short-Term Investments Current Receivables)/Current Liabilities
... but I don't know what numbers to use for these. The numbers I have for my general journal are...
DEBITS
Financial ratio limitations - current ratio and debt to equity
[ 2 Answers ]
Hi, I have a problem which is as follows;
Contracts with lenders, such as bonds typically place restrictions on the financial statement ratios. Two commonly used ratios are the current ratio and the debt-to-equity ratio. Why is it that these appear as restrictions, that is, do they protect the...
View more questions
Search
|