
Originally Posted by
zshapek68
Lizett: Im sorry they upset you,,, I take it with a grain of salt. Everyone on here seems to have an opinion rather than good legal advice,, which was all I asked for,, not someones opinion. I simply asked a question,, I never said I wasnt going to pay child support, matter of fact, Ive paid over $33,000 since 2003 so I am far better of a parent than most who dont pay.
You have paid $3,666/year; $916/child per year; $17.62/child per week. Not terribly generous. Yes, I do agree - paying $17.62/week to support a child is better than paying nothing. (This is the “I’m bad but they’re worse” defense.)
What makes you think you’re the only person on AMHD who has ever been in a custody fight? What makes your “story ... very unusual”? Again, why the assumption - “I don’t have to explain ... but I will so you can have some sort of knowledge you have never experienced and I hope you never will!” It appears you haven’t read any other threads.
Why after 10 years of marriage and 4 children you didn’t “ask” for anything other than child support after ten years of marriage and 4 children with a man you say is very wealthy is confusing. You asked for nothing - no spousal support, no division of community property, nothing. That isn’t even allowed in my State. So that I “can have some sort of knowledge,” why would you do that? Your Attorney went along with it? You work $12/hour jobs, he’s very well off and you get nothing after 10 years?
If I understand what you are saying, in 2000 (following the 1998 divorce) you and your children (you had residential custody) moved to Colorado to live with your “ex,” the “evil” man who, so far, had done everything he could to destroy you.
Did you get Court permission to leave your State and make the move, reconciling but not remarrying, protecting your options? Colorado became your children’s legal residence.
You moved back to your “old house” (I have no idea who owned the “old house” at that point if you received nothing in the divorce settlement). You “told” him you were moving. Through a series of scams and misrepresentations he (and, of course his Attorney, and your 10-year old son who admitted in Court that he didn’t know what he was signing and/or what the paper said) managed to get a restraining order against you and get the children moved back to their legal residence in Colorado.
For whatever reason the Court forced you to do “numerous of things” to prove you are psychologically sound, you had to undergo therapy “several” times (and twice a week, so I’m assuming for two weeks) and you had to prove your house is safe. I would think you passed with flying colors. Assuming your “ex” had to go through the same evaluations and had the same burden of proof, was it determined that he was a good parent? I’ve done a lot of background in a lot of similar cases and I’ve never seen a person who moved from here to there with children, with no other issues, having to undergo “numerous of things” UNLESS there’s an abuse problem of some sort - alcohol, drugs, children.
You then sold your house which apparently was yours before the marriage because you left the marriage with nothing. You petitioned for him to pay your Attorney fees but were denied?
How can this happen? I don’t understand it. That’s why I asked for an explanation.
Now you have a fairly large past-due child support balance and you want to know if you have to pay it (because your children are over 18) and if you can go to school so you don’t to pay it.
At 18 your children can decide where to live - they live with you now? With their father? What is their choice?
You protected one of your children from another one of your children? How did that factor into any of this?