Check out some similar questions!

Fr_Chuck · Oct 10, 2011, 07:24 AM

Agree forever, if you had a warrant issued 30 years ago, there is still a warrant.

Some warrants on traffic tickets are closed after a number of years by some cities.

AK lawyer · Oct 10, 2011, 07:41 AM

Originally Posted by hollandgirl

With having a conflict of interest with judge,prosecutor & public defender could you throw some idea on how to handle this matter and what should I do?

What is the exact nature of the conflict? How does each of those three participants have a suspected conflict of interest?

Fr_Chuck · Oct 10, 2011, 07:44 AM

Yes, in most cases, judges, and a attorneys all know each other. If you have issues with your attorney, ask for another one to be assigned.

If there is a issue with the judge, have your attorney ask for the judge to excuse his self, or ask for a change of venue even, if there is a real reason for it.

Again and about three threads we asked for detains, and you seem to refuse to give us any real reason.

AK lawyer · Oct 10, 2011, 07:56 AM

Originally Posted by CliffARobinson

... In my personal, laymen's opinion, if it was me, I would tread extremely carefully. ...

Maybe, to some extent, with the judge. But with your attorney, if you know or suspect a conflict, confront him or her and get it out in the open immediately. You deserve an explanation if you believe there is a conflict.

And I see no reason for reluctance to address the possibly of a conflicted prosecutor either. He/she isn't on your side; you have no cause to be concerned with ticking him/her off.

The judge: obviously you want to be careful there. But there are ways to deal with the problem. And, unlike Cliff, I don't know if it necessarily has to involve an attorney from a distant venue.

AK lawyer · Oct 10, 2011, 08:13 AM

Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck

Yes, in most cases, judges, and a attorneys all know each other. ...

Which, by the way, isn't a conflict of interest.

In my hometown, I used to have lunch with judges, prosecutors, and other attorneys every week. Not a problem at all.

But we didn't trade favors or expect favors at our clients' expense. That would be a horse of a different color.

JudyKayTee · Oct 10, 2011, 02:03 PM

Originally Posted by hollandgirl

they found in the house some fuel and stuff he was suppose to be getting ready to leave with.yes he has been in prison one other time for drugs about 4 years ago.there was never any test done.he was in jail 10 days til i came up with his bond.they kept him in detox 7 days i asked why they said cause his levels was high but,they never did ant kind of test on him or our home.they wanted him to set someone up .then they condemed our house again now we are homeless because he rufused.

No, this is not entirely correct. You are homeless because you allowed a drug dealer into your home and were not willing to testify against him.

Someone decided your husband's "levels were high" without testing him?

I'm sorry but I find your story very far fetched.

ScottGem · Oct 11, 2011, 04:05 PM

You have been advised before not to keep starting new threads. All of your questions bear on each so its best to keep them together.

hollandgirl · Nov 2, 2011, 09:18 AM

On a concent search if were not married and one says no to the search the lease is in both are names were both present at the time would they need both concents since one of the parties is saying no to the search?

JudyKayTee · Nov 2, 2011, 10:00 AM

Either one can give permission.

hollandgirl · Nov 4, 2011, 12:12 PM

On a concent search two live there for a concent search since were not married both names on the lease both present one saying no to the search wuold they need both concents ?it was for a drug search seems funny that there were 4 adults present but,they only took my boyfriend to jail.I was present both our names are on the leases why they only took his concent and only him to jail .should all of us went to jail?we live in peru,in 46970 we need advice please help.

JudyKayTee · Nov 4, 2011, 12:18 PM

Please stop posting the same question(s) over and over again.

This has been discussed in great detail. It's consent, by the way, and the only need the consent of ONE of the parties. They got it.

Why did they take only your boyfriend and not all four of you? I have no idea. Yes, I believe you ALL should have gone. Bring that to the attention of the Police.

You continue to post new questions without answering what WE ask YOU in order to give you an accurate answer. Your husband's "levels were high"... but he wasn't tested? How is that possible.

Sometimes it's your boyfriend you're talking about. Sometimes it's your husband. Which is it?

I pulled the newspaper article - was your husband/boyfriend arrested for operating a meth lab? If so, the facts are not exactly as you have stated. Or was it something else? It indicates he had outstanding warrants on charges of obstruction of justice, false reporting or informing, forgery and battery, dating back to 1999.

hollandgirl · Nov 4, 2011, 12:29 PM

Thank you for the answers at the moment were not married .we plan our wedding Dec,31 2011 that is my birthday and going to be a very happy one this year.we have been together 4 years.one more thing he was arrested June 15th.Nov 10th is our 3rd.court hearing they keep putting it off 30 to 60 days cause they still don't have all the discovery shouldn't that all done been together and us have a copy?thanks for you're help.

excon · Nov 5, 2011, 07:34 AM

Hello Colleagues:

If I understand correctly, she's on parole... No consent necessary.

excon