 |
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 2, 2011, 07:45 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Coalitions and compromise takes time, to work thru checks and balances and all that money.
Indeed, You are right, no one has the perfect system, some systems work well and progess is achieved. Some do not and produce dysfunctional solutions. We think that a government should get on with doing what a government is elected to do and so when there is a minority in charge of the Senate, we do not let that get in the way of government.
We have some interesting debates going on at the moment in which it appears compromise might not be possible. They are the Carbon Tax and offshore processing of Refugee Applicants (otherwise known as the Malaysia solution). These things have become emotive because we have a government which was not elected in its own right but is held in place by a "coalition" of some most unlikely bedfellows. Not unlike your own, this government controls the Senate, but only with the goodwill of others.
What happens Tal is that unpopular ideas are sometimes tested in a smaller setting before moving on.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Oct 2, 2011, 08:22 PM
|
|
Local and regional attitudes are really deep in the house right now, and conservatives have stifled any compromising for now, but we do have another election and hopefully this will yield a higher turnout, which would favor moderates and progressives.
Heck they have a computer for the Financial sector, wish we could replace the congress with one. Our debates are a joke in the primary as everyone is trying to get to the political right, where the conservatives and extremely conservatives are. They hate progress, and long for the good old days and NO government, until a flood or something comes through. There numbers though are sizable 30/40%, so they can't be ignored, nor should they. They slow the process down though, and maybe that's not a completely bad thing, but some accept change quicker than others. There in lies the rub, and where we lose speed, and flexibility of government.
Heck, had we raised taxes in 2008, when this mess started, we could have had enough growth to avoid another financial meltdown, and been much further down the road of recovery, despite what the rest of the world was doing.
But as we see, some would just as soon shut the government down, than work on consensus.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 2, 2011, 08:35 PM
|
|
Consensus, what is the opposite to that, nonsense?
As a guide the opposite to progress is congress
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 3, 2011, 03:59 AM
|
|
conservatives have stifled any compromising
Bs... the bill has been talking about is stalled in the Senate (controlled by the Dems ) .Majority leader Reid says he has more important things on his agenda.
You want consensus ? Stop the class warfare of the President . You want to change taxes ? Then overhaul the tax code for all Americans instead of targeting the few .
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 3, 2011, 07:04 AM
|
|
Exactly... to the Democrats "compromise" is code for do what we want, how we want, when we want, and don't disagree in any way, shape or form. They have failed to grasp that they lost the last election due to among many other things... telling the Republicans to " sit in the back of the bus and be quiet". As Obama said publicly.
Obamacare is a good example of Democrat "compromise". Done behind closed doors where Republicans weren't even allowed to be present or propose any amendments, or to even have a proper vote on.
A lot like how things happen in dictatorships around the world.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Oct 3, 2011, 09:52 AM
|
|
I get your feelings but as usually you have NO facts. Republicans had more than a year to contribute both to debate, and legislation. Indeed many amendments, and ideas, were incorporated, yet they backed away as they always have the last 3 years when it comes to actually passing something.
Even after taking some power, which not only was not a mandate, but regional, in the last election, they have failed to enact any kind of job solutions, but have attacked abortion and voting laws, while states cut teachers and police, as villains, and let bridges and roads fall apart.
But when you do NOTHING to help build, its easy to jump on the "enemy", the one you hate, and blame him for everything bad in the world, while relieving yourself of responsibility for FAILURE, and Ineptness.
So while you point the finger at Mr. Obama, remember you are pointing the other 3 at YOURSELF. Make sure you take some blame for the mess, and if you can't help clean it up, then get out of the way while the cleaning crew does its job.
Lets make it official, I blame YOU as much as I blame the government for this world class mess. So if you want a debate, brings some FACTS!!
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 3, 2011, 11:06 AM
|
|
We had a year to contribute what? They refused a vote on anything the republicans propsed... when we got enough democrats they resorted to questionable tactics of putting it through without a vote, after havign drafted it behind closed doors... and even in violation of Obamas "transparency rules" by not letting anyone have a chance to even read it.
If the Supreme court doesn't say its unconstitutional, when a Republican gets voted in and we take over the Senate in 2012 we will repeal it in its entirety.
And even if we don't... we will defund it preventing it from ever taking full effect.
Perhaps after its gone the left will grasp the concept of "Cooperation" doesn't mean ramming something down everyone's throats that few actually even want.
And even better... we repeal it using the very same tactics and methods they used to ram it through without a proper vote.
Heck... if the rules allowed THEM to do it... they can't say a thing when we undo it the very same way.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Oct 3, 2011, 11:46 AM
|
|
I go along with tax reform, but at least they will go back to the way it was in January of next year, which is just as cool with me.
You get to vote next year too, just as I do. Until then the debate continues, and for the record, I stand by my comments on flexibility, and shared prosperity in good times, and shared responsibility in urgent times. I just don't think its fair for the ones that caused this mess to be made whole, and the ones that made them whole again to be left holding the bag.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 3, 2011, 12:00 PM
|
|
Yeah... pure liberal propaganda. When did this proper vote take place after all? Right, it didn't...
When you have to wait years to get a hearing aid like in England... or have to wait 6-9 months for cancer surgery in Canada... I bet they are going to be real happy with socialized health care. But then the Elite won't have it will they?
If it was so damned good, why did Congress opt out of it... and why did Obama give so many wavers for political payback. You'd think ALL liberals would be flocking to it if it was even 1% of what they claim it is... after all, FREE, nobody has yet figured out where all of these FREE doctors are going to come from, or where all of these FREE machines are going to come from or where all these FREE medications are coming from? After all, its FREE isn't it? I suppose all the liberals are going to volunteer to do all those jobs for FREE since they love that system so much.
Maybe Hollywood will start making movies for FREE too so all the poor can see movies again, and all the stars will work for FREE, and so will all the Sports stars and teams too.
Or maybe they can just all go to CUBA, where Democrats are trying to model the Healthcare system after as well as the political system.
Maybe all the Democrats will suddenly decide to serve for FREE and decline any salaries since they think everyone else should work for FREE.
When the economy finishes its collapse... and nobody can get real healthcare much less jobs... they will try to blame it on the evil rich who refuse to do ALL the work and pay ALL the bills. Or like a broken record... blame it on Bush.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 3, 2011, 12:12 PM
|
|
I've been inside European Hospitals too many times over the last 25 years, I've seen too many people in them as patients, I've seen too many people die in them... people I knew personally.
I've been in American hospitals too, twice as a patient for surgery.
European Health care and hospitals scare the hell out of me.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Oct 3, 2011, 02:38 PM
|
|
I feel the same about American hospitals, and have more than a few horror stories of my own.
|
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Oct 3, 2011, 03:33 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
If the Supreme court doesn't say its unconstitutional, when a Republican gets voted in and we take over the Senate in 2012 we will repeal it in its entirety.
And even if we don't....we will defund it preventing it from ever taking full effect.
Perhaps after its gone the left will grasp the concept of "Cooperation" doesn't mean ramming something down everyones throats that few actually even want.
And even better...we repeal it using the very same tactics and methods they used to ram it through without a proper vote.
Heck...if the rules allowed THEM to do it....they can't say a thing when we undo it the very same way.
Sounds to me like the right wants to save the future by going back to the past while the left wants to move to the future without considering the past.
Also sounds like a recipe for becoming a political dinosaur.
Tut
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 3, 2011, 03:48 PM
|
|
Also sounds like a recipe for becoming a political dinosaur
The left ? Absolutely... we are seeing it happening in Greece now ;and it will ripple throughout the states that think they can hold power by distributing largess like bread and circuses to retain power. It has been a recipe for failure in the past ,and so it is today.
|
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Oct 4, 2011, 03:45 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
the left ? absolutely ... we are seeing it happening in Greece now ;and it will ripple throughout the states that think they can hold power by distributing largess like bread and circuses to retain power. It has been a recipe for failure in the past ,and so it is today.
Hi Tom,
Yes, but I was thinking more in terms of two dinosaurs.
Tut
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 4, 2011, 04:37 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by TUT317
Sounds to me like the right wants to save the future by going back to the past while the left wants to move to the future without considering the past.
Also sounds like a recipe for becoming a political dinosaur.
Tut
Well the real difference is there is no reason to totally abandon a system that works extremely well for one that works as well nowhere else.
Some people would take anything just because its "FREE" to them rather than pay for something that is far superiour.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 4, 2011, 04:49 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
I feel the same about American hospitals, and have more than a few horror stories of my own.
Unless you have spent YEARS living somewhere that actually has socialized medicine to compare it to... then all you are doing is blindly accepting something as fact.
I have had the last 25 years to compare European Socialized medicine to the far superiour American system, first hand, with my own eyes.
As I've said before... I have legal residency and work status in the EU. I could hop a flight tomorrow and start working the following day there legally anyplace I want. I've had that status the last 20 years. The 5 years prior to that I was a resident and a military ID card holder but only had work status on a US Militiary base.
Its also sad that most of the people trying to ram that down our throats have never been out of the country at all, and most of the rest haven't been more than tourists. I've actually been a long term resident, I've been through emergency rooms over there, I've been on Ambulances over there... I've been to doctors over there.
99.9% of those who want it, only want something free someone else will have to pay for, and take the word of people who have an agenda to push. The same people that generally know nothing about the real system and have this fictional Utopian view of a system that exists noplace in the world as they imagine it because it doesn't work.
Besides... what most people THINK are free and fully covered under European socialized health care, aren't.
Go to a specialist, you pay out of pocket, prescriptions... out of pocket, go to an optician get mamograms etc... you pay out of pocket. Dentists, out of pocket, eye doctor and glasses... out of pocket.
Go to a private doctor or Private hospital (yes they do have them) you pay out of pocket.
|
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Oct 4, 2011, 06:07 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
Well the real difference is there is no reason to totally abandon a system that works extremely well for one that works as well nowhere else.
Hi Smoothy,
Could you run that by me again please.
Tut
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Oct 4, 2011, 07:11 AM
|
|
Then keep what you have and leave everyone else alone.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 4, 2011, 09:40 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by TUT317
Hi Smoothy,
Could you run that by me again please.
Tut
The system we have now works very well... why change to a system that works poorly every place else in comparison.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Country First - snicker, guffaw, BWA ha ha ha.
[ 45 Answers ]
Hello wingers:
If 72 year old John McCain held his country first, why would he choose a neophyte to be his running mate? I'll tell you why. Because she appeals to his base - not his country. He's doing this because he wants to win. That means ME FIRST, country second.
In fact, if you look...
Up Coming Debates
[ 4 Answers ]
I heard on TV that there will be a couple of televised debates upcoming before the Michigan(?) or Nevada(?) or So.Carolina, elections, but I didn't write down the dates.
Can anyone tell me when these debates are? I feel certain both debates are this coming week.
Cordially, :)
Debates galore!
[ 31 Answers ]
This is a discussion purely for arguing with each other. Do whatever, just be a good sport about it.
Second question:
"Should you go out of your way to help people who bury their own graves?"
Here would be an example of the preceding question:
"A person drinks, does all sorts of drugs,...
Input: When Debates Erupt
[ 29 Answers ]
Ok, let's hear y'all's input.
Asker asks for opinions and users give them.
... then members get into a debate over who's right and who's wrong (remember, the asker is asking for opinions).
Recognizing the goal of the site to be a repository of answers, how far should these debates be...
View more questions
Search
|