Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #21

    Mar 9, 2011, 05:44 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    What about NPR ? Clearly they are a hate group .
    Yes... and here is the video proof that it goes all the way to the top there.

    NPR executive calls Tea Party supporters 'racist' - On Politics: Covering the US Congress, Governors, and the 2012 Election - USATODAY.com

    Particularly since they are required to be neutral as part of the conditions of receiving federal money all these years.

    Its not been a secret of their left wing bias even though the left has denied it over and over... finally its on video and it can't be denied any longer.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #22

    Mar 9, 2011, 06:02 AM

    I thought his anti-Jewish speech during the interview would clearly get NPR listed along side all the other 'right-wing 'extemist groups in the SPLC cite .
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #23

    Mar 9, 2011, 06:09 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    I thought his anti-Jewish speech during the interview would clearly get NPR listed along side all the other 'right-wing 'extemist groups in the SPLC cite .
    Just proves that place isn't interested in being fair... or being honest. Just like every other left leaning outfit I know of.

    Incidentally... LIke ACORN... that one video isn't all there is. There is more than that which will be coming out in the days ahead.

    http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...mo_code=BD36-1


    Personally I can't wait to see these pompous blowhards finally take a fall after sucking on the public tit all these years.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #24

    Mar 9, 2011, 06:13 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello Steve:

    Yeah, where's Green Peace? They're full of Muslims aren't they?
    Greenpeace terrorizes the Japanese.




    We have other homegrown terrorists which SPLC doesn't seem to mind.

    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #25

    Mar 9, 2011, 06:37 AM

    Hello again,

    I agree with all of you that all these groups need investigating, including NPR.

    NONE of that, however, changes the absolute WRONGHEADEDNESS of Peter Kings committee. Besides, didn't Peter King support the terrorist group, IRA?? He DID, didn't he? How would he know what a terrorist is? He LOVES terrorists. Couldn't you find a better person to do this?? This is suicidal, wingers... But, go for it.

    excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #26

    Mar 9, 2011, 07:19 AM

    It's a funny thing. An Investors Business Daily editorial yesterday complained that King wasn't going hard enough ,complaining about the list of people testifying .

    Rep. King: Don't Pull Any Punches - Investors.com

    As far as Pete King's defense of the IRA... I disagree with him . But that is completely irrelevant to this discussion. The IRA's terrorist past is for a nationalist movement that has never been a threat to the U.S. To my knowledge they never exported their terrorist activities to target anyone other than the Brits.

    Jihadist are international and attack many peoples in many countries ,and have often attacked American here and abroad.
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #27

    Mar 9, 2011, 07:39 AM

    Nothing wrong with investigating Muslims groups when Muslim groups are responsible for most terrorist threats against the USA.

    Would it make more since to investigate UNICEF instead? You look where the problem exists. Not where it doesn't.

    If you want to bust Crack Dealers... looking in crack houses is a good place to start... not Day care centers.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #28

    Mar 10, 2011, 11:45 AM

    A catholic jihadist investigating muslim jihadist?! Only in America.

    There are no crack dealers in crack houses. Just crack users.
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #29

    Mar 10, 2011, 11:58 AM

    So... the new lefty term for drug dealer is Drug user? Then what do they call drug users now Phamacists? You don't have crack houses where there aren't any crack dealers. THey aren't going to take there bus or cab to get to the crack house.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #30

    Mar 10, 2011, 12:16 PM

    Naw the crack dealer is down the street at the corner, they stay out of crack houses because that's the first place the cops go.

    Now the high class dope dealers are in the burbs, they don't have to visit dope houses either. Why, because when snorters get together they call it a house party. Music, booze, and loose women. Remember sex, drugs, and rock and roll?? Cops never bust them.

    Sorry I was off topic, this is about violent nuts ain't it? Like the guy that shot those people in Arizona, after buy an Uzi or something from Walmart?? Oh sorry wrong religion!
    Well how about the real dope dealer shooting up the cops and their rival dope dealers, oh wait wrong religion again, geeez I guess all that matters is who you are scared of and why.
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #31

    Mar 10, 2011, 12:22 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Naw the crack dealer is down the street at the corner, they stay out of crack houses because thats the first place the cops go.

    Now the high class dope dealers are in the burbs, they don't have to visit dope houses either. Why, because when snorters get together they call it a house party. Music, booze, and loose women. Remember sex, drugs, and rock and roll??? Cops never bust them.
    Cops been to more than a few parties I was at I'm my youth... but they didn't bust anyone. Though we did have to explain to the officeres why one loud drunk guy was handcuffed to the railing in front of the house one time at 2am.

    THey weren't too keen on the idea until we explained that it was to keep him from driving away until he sobered up because he was REALLY insistant he was driving home when he could barely stand up. The police calmed down after we explained that. THey even forgot I dodged their question WHERE I got the handcuffs from in the first place to lock the drunk up (yeah they WERE real police issue)
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #32

    Mar 12, 2011, 09:29 AM

    Its okay to do dope, and drink in the burbs, but its illegal in the cities. Its always been like that even though most of the dope is in the burbs. Thought you knew that?

    Anyway for a terrorist to be heading an investigation against other terrorist, and not himself, is absurd. For him to draw distinctions is even more ridicules.
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #33

    Mar 14, 2011, 10:38 AM

    Really... any proof he is a terrorist... I know Democrats think anyone to the right of trotsky is a terrorist. But there is ZERO indications HE is a terrorist.

    And Muslims when THEY are the greatest source of terrorists in the world today... SHOULD be investigated.

    Perhaps people of Italian Descent should be given a free pass on MAFIA investigations as well.

    Or the KKK and White Supremacist groups should be given a free pass anythime someone claims a hate crime against a minority.

    NOT investigating Muslims in relation to Terrorism cases is not any different than doing any of the previous mentioned examples.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #34

    Mar 14, 2011, 11:09 AM

    Still waiting for the example of an attack on the US by the IRA .
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #35

    Mar 14, 2011, 01:20 PM

    Hello tom:

    You're right. In a twisted right wing sort of way it's logical. They didn't attack us, so they can't BE terrorists.. Besides, they're white and Catholic, just like Peter King is, so that PROVES it.

    I'm sure the victims at the Burmingham pub bombing will be pleased to learn this wonderful news.

    excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #36

    Mar 14, 2011, 01:45 PM

    King is in charge of the Homeland Security Committee... that means it is proper to hold committee meetings assessing the threat of terrorist of attack on America . The IRA poses no such threat.

    All this stuff about the IRA is deflection from the issue.

    You want to know the 'right wing' response? President Bush took care of that when he refused to invite Gerry Adams to the White House. He told him he was no longer welcome .

    Did he as leader of the IRA visit the White House ? Yes ,when President Clintoon invited him. He did that over the Brit's protest and after Adams Visa had been denied for 20 years. Then in 1994 the terrorist leader of the IRA visited the White House under the beloved President of the people who are giving criticism to King.

    Oh yeah.. Gerry Adams the terrorist leader also attended Obama's inauguration.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #37

    Mar 23, 2011, 02:10 PM

    Sen D*ck Turban is going to hold counter-hearings aimed to prove that Muslims are an oppressed minority in the US . (Scheduled for March 29)State Politics and Political News | The State Column

    In 2009, the latest FBi statistics available, anti-Islamic hate crimes accounted for 9.3 percent of the 1,376 religiously motivated hate crimes recorded. The most oppressed religious minority in the US?. The Jews (70.1 percent of hate crimes reported ).Looking forward to the American hearings addressing this pogrom.
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #38

    Mar 25, 2011, 07:39 AM

    I think D1ck Durban needs to be checked for diminished mental facilities due to advanced age.

    The mans brain isn't firing on all cylinders.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Why at this time non muslims are much much advanced in science than muslims? [ 10 Answers ]

I am saying this because I am particularly interested in physics at this time and I think that science would be the most appropriat language for expressing our religon to non muslims.but most muslims seem to be far away from the scientific knowledge and seem to be backward.we muslims are not fully...

. If there is collision between the president and Congress, can Congress restrain the [ 1 Answers ]

Can anyone help on this topic? I have to find all the information I can on this, so I can write a 2 to 4 page essay about. Thanks!


View more questions Search