
Originally Posted by
JudyKayTee
... I don't understand the circumstances - ?
It appears that the document was prepared in California, using the "in California" language, and taken to Mississippi, for execution. The person who was to sign it before a notary took it to a local notary who, once it was signed, notarized it without paying any attention to the locational recital.
Actually, the certificate is not necessarily incorrect. The notary certified "under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the" document was true and correct. It doesn't certifiy that it was signed in California. Depending upon the applicable rules for wherever this document is going to be used, it might work. Some court rules, for example, allow for the filing and admission of documents notarized out-of-state. I don't know if I agree with the opinion of the National Associaton of Notaries that if the notarial certificate recites that it was sworn to under the perjury penalties of a state other than where it is being executed, the document is necessarily invalid.
This whole problem could have been avoided had the drafter of the certificate refrained from using the name of the state. Thus "under the penalties for perjury, that ..." would have been better. Note, also, that the sentence is ambiguous: It could either mean that
- the signer of the document is saying he is aware that he is subject to a penalty for perjury in California, or that
- he is so certifying, ostensibly according to, and as required by, California laws.
Under either meaning, the statement could be correct:
PENAL CODE
SECTION 118-131
118. (a) Every person who, having taken an oath that he or she will
Testify, declare, depose, or certify truly before any competent
Tribunal, officer, or person, in any of the cases in which the oath
May by law of the State of California be administered, willfully and
Contrary to the oath, states as true any material matter which he or
She knows to be false, and every person who testifies, declares,
Deposes, or certifies under penalty of perjury in any of the cases in
Which the testimony, declarations, depositions, or certification is
Permitted by law of the State of California under penalty of perjury
And willfully states as true any material matter which he or she
Knows to be false, is guilty of perjury.
This subdivision is applicable whether the statement, or the
testimony, declaration, deposition, or certification is made or
subscribed within or without the State of California.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/di...0&file=118-131
Thus, if something recited in the document is materially and knowingly false, execution of this document, even though done in Mississippi, is a violation of the California perjury statute.