
Originally Posted by
adam_89
He was in jail without bond until then. Then the judge decided to set bond for $300 and released him to his ex girlfriend
Hello again, adam:
There's a couple of issues that weren't addressed here... It's very easy to Monday morning quarterback, and vilify a judge for his decisions. In my view, assuming the judge acted within his discretion, that is something we SHOULDN'T do. That is, unless we criticize them equally when they make the wrong decision in the OTHER direction... And, we don't...
Here's an example of the other direction... Recently, here in my town, an exconvict OUT ON BAIL, murdered four cops while they were sipping their morning coffee. When one reviews the behavior of ALL the judges who dealt with him in his past, there's a lot to dislike... Certainly, the judge who let him out on bail made a mistake... But, also mistaken, was the judge who originally encountered the defendant as a teen aged, uneducated, black, first offender in the deep south, on a relatively minor charge, who sentenced him to 117 YEARS... No matter what he did, I can't get past a 17 year old doing 117 years...
Say what you will about me, I'm not sure WHICH judge is the bad guy here...
The other factor we need to consider, is that bail is a Constitutional right. Judges need to balance the safety of the public, with a defendants right to bail. That is NOT an easy line to follow. To suggest that a judge should be sued, and or disciplined for "judging", isn't something we should do.
excon