 |
|
|
 |
Internet Research Expert
|
|
Oct 18, 2010, 06:10 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by excon
Hello again, dad:
Look. I dunno if they really had the legal power to arrest him. That may, or may not ever be determined... Nonetheless, I think it's a little brown shirty. That's all.
excon
Is there any video posted of this because I can imagine it going either way. I have seen it from both sides and without knowing more about it according to that second link I provided in the last post it is legal. Now that doesn't mean it was correct in any way. And if all we have is writing. Then that is all we have to judge from. It doesn't look good anyway you view it.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 18, 2010, 06:14 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by califdadof3
Is there any video posted of this
Hello again, dad:
Not exactly, but close. Look HERE!
excon
|
|
 |
Internet Research Expert
|
|
Oct 18, 2010, 06:26 PM
|
|
Seeing the video it looks like the reporters wanted to become the news. If they did have rights to the building by renting it they also have the right to refuse persons entering the building. They appeared to be away from the event. So it was clear they could have been gguilty of tresspass if asked to leave and refuse. Im sure it could have been done more tacfully but that's how yahoo's operate.
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Oct 18, 2010, 06:29 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
If Joe Miller rented the facilities, it's private, whatever he wants to call it
Sweet Joe announced it as a public town hall meeting in a public building.
you can be the first woman to weigh in on NOW's hypocrisy in their disrespect for Meg Whitman.
I LOVE to read up on things, but please don't use "weigh" in the same sentence as "woman." Will check into the Whitman thing.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 18, 2010, 06:37 PM
|
|
That video is taken after the fact.
Here's the Alaska law. Once the reporter /blogger was asked to leave and didn't he became a trespasser under Alaska law.
AS 11.46.350. Definition.
(a) As used in AS 11.46.300 - 11.46.350, unless the context requires otherwise, “enter or remain unlawfully” means to
(1) enter or remain in or upon premises or in a propelled vehicle when the premises or propelled vehicle, at the time of the entry or remaining, is not open to the public and when the defendant is not otherwise privileged to do so;
(2) fail to leave premises or a propelled vehicle that is open to the public after being lawfully directed to do so personally by the person in charge; or
(3) enter or remain upon premises or in a propelled vehicle in violation of a provision in an order issued or filed under AS 18.66.100 - 18.66.180 or issued under former AS 25.35.010 (b) or 25.35.020...
(
Alaska Statutes: AS 11.46.350. Definition.
A citizen's arrest was in order.
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 02:40 AM
|
|
THANK YOU! - Unfortunately, as we can see from their answers, those against you not really into reading, aren't very articulate in most cases, we just have to keep trying. It is truly amazing how so many will defend those taking away the very rights they claim to want to protect. Amazing.
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 02:51 AM
|
|
Comment on speechlesstx's post
The cop backing up illegal action is still illegal.A public forum is PUBLIC. A public figure has to answer to the public paying him/her to work for them. What is the matter with people? Yet again the result of educational funds deteriorating.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 03:28 AM
|
|
those against you not really into reading, aren't very articulate in most cases...
What is the matter with people? Yet again the result of educational funds deteriorating.
Nice ad hominems Betty . Is that what you consider intelligent discussion/debate ?
|
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 04:26 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
Nice ad hominems Betty . Is that what you consider intelligent discussion/debate ?
I think the attacks should be directed back to the original Alaskan Statutes you cited. Can the hall be hired as a public place while at the same time advertising it as a public forum?
The fallacy may well be taking the source at its face value. Tom, are you trying to convince us of the validity source( Alaskan Statutes) by saying we should taking it at face value.
Regards
Tut
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 04:43 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Sweet Joe announced it as a public town hall meeting in a public building.
I LOVE to read up on things, but please don't use "weigh" in the same sentence as "woman." Will check into the Whitman thing.
So "weigh" is now some form of hate speech against women or something? I thought women wanted to be treated equally.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 04:44 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
So "weigh" is now some form of hate speech against women or something? I thought women wanted to be treated equally.
Dear FSM, you have no sense of humour whatsoever!
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 05:34 AM
|
|
TUT . I can cite a number of other sources that detail Alaska law. I assure you that Alaska statutes 11.46.320-350 deal with TRESSPASSING .
The law makes it very clear that once the 'blogger' was asked to leave and didn't ,he was a tresspasser.
Also this incident occurred after the Town Hall event finished and the candidate was attempting to leave . The meeting ceased to be "public " when Miller left the podium. It was then that Hopfinger harassed Miller ;and got physical against Miller's guards. Miller rented the building; regardless of “public meeting' or not . He had a right to evict Hopfinger ,and when he refused ,to detain him until the police arrived.
I also note that when SEIU thugs were beating on conservative attendees of town hall meetings (as per the President's instructions to "get in your neighbor's face") all you could hear at this forum was crickets chirping .
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 05:42 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
I also note that when SEIU thugs were beating on conservative attendees of town hall meetings (as per the President's instructions to "get in your neighbor's face") all you could hear at this forum was crickets chirping .
Hello again, tom:
I don't know about you righty's and the English language... Getting in your neighbors face is WAYYYY different than handcuffing him - at least where I live...
excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 05:44 AM
|
|
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 05:46 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
The meeting ceased to be "public " when Miller left the podium.
can you quote us the law that affirms this?
 Originally Posted by tomder55
I also note that when SEIU thugs were beating on conservative attendees of town hall meetings (as per the President's instructions to "get in your neighbor's face") all you could hear at this forum was crickets chirping .
The SEIU aren't the subject of this post. The subject is "Joe Miller arrests reporter."'Nuff said.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 05:47 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
How about a beating (as I mentioned )?
Totally irrelevant. Please stay on topic.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 05:52 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
How about a beating (as I mentioned )?
Hello again, tom:
YOUR video is as inclusive as the other one is, yet you made conclusions about it. Why can't I do the same thing?
excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 06:13 AM
|
|
NK once Joe Miller concluded the meeting ,and had exited the auditorium into the hallway, ipso facto the public meeting had concluded .
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 06:18 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
NK once Joe Miller concluded the meeting ,and had exited the auditorium into the hallway, ipso facto the public meeting had concluded .
So he exited into a public area and suddenly it's no longer public? LOL!
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 19, 2010, 06:22 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
NK once Joe Miller concluded the meeting ,and had exited the auditorium into the hallway, ipso facto the public meeting had concluded .
Hello again, tom:
Spin it any way you choose... But this is a PUBLIC candidate running for a PUBLIC office, and the distinction whether the venue was "public" or "private" and WHEN that occurred BLURS what happened here. The reporter followed the PUBLIC candidate running for a PUBLIC office, after his PUBLIC town hall meeting, in a PUBLIC school, to ask him a question. The PUBLIC candidate had his goons arrest him.
It's BROWN SHIRTY! It's UGLY. This man should NEVER hold power. He's a DANGER.
excon
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Do arrests show up on LIVESCAN fingerprinting?
[ 2 Answers ]
I was arrested two years ago for getting into a physical fight with an ex-boyfriend. I had to stay in jail for a few days but then I was released with NO conviction. I want to get a livescan fingerprinting, but I am wondering if this arrest will show up? I don't want this to hurt my chances of...
Searches, arrests and the Supreme Court
[ 15 Answers ]
I haven’t had time to read the whole decision but a friend just e-mailed me that on Wednesday the US Supreme Court ruled that evidence seized in an improper arrest does not have to be thrown out IF the error which lead to the arrest (and subsequent finding of evidence and subsequent charges) was...
Arrests that had been expunged from FBI
[ 9 Answers ]
Hello and good afternoon. Back in NY in 1996 I was charged with a class b misdemeanor but pled guilty to a non-criminal offense, known as a 'violation"(not a fingerprintable offense) in NY state. I paid a $50 fine, received a conditional discharge, and my criminal records were sealed as per 160.55...
View more questions
Search
|