Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #1

    Oct 2, 2010, 06:46 AM
    I don't know if you noticed, but our war with gay people is about to end.
    Hello:

    There seems to be a spate of events related to our discrimination against gay people recently. A college student taped his gay roommate having sex and broadcast it... The gay student killed himself...

    Here is an interview with Anderson Cooper with a crazy LAWYER who works for the ATTORNEY GENERAL in his state. He's being investigated now, but I can't believe he hasn't been fired...

    Don't ask, don't tell is about to fall. TWO federal judges ruled against it in just the past month... Nope. It's over. What we're seeing is the last gasp of a dying philosophy. Bummer for you righty's, huh?

    excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    Oct 2, 2010, 09:42 AM

    In the original 'MASH' movie they miked a tent where Hot Lips and Frank Burns were “doing it”. In ' American Pie' they used a webcam to record one of their buddies sexual encounters.

    I don't think the Rutgers tragedy is much different than a college prank that went bad.

    Dharun Ravi, 18, of Plainsboro and Molly Wei, 18, of Princeton have been charged with invasion of privacy .

    Let's think this through . 2 freshmen students who I presume were immigrant or 2nd generation children of immigrants webcam a roommate's sex as a pranking . The evidence of discrimination is that one of them ,Ravi made comments on line that his roommate was making out with a dude.
    This happened at one of the liberal bastions of higher learning in NJ .

    Now ,if (as you call it) discrimination against gay people ... is a dying philosophy;you would've thought the first place it would've been buried was on a liberal campus.

    The real issue here is a lack of respect among our youth ,regardless of their sexual preferences . Already four teen students, as young as 13 and as old as 18, have taken their lives this school year because of ridicule and bullying .
    Since 2003 in the United States, at least a dozen youths between 11 and 18 have killed themselves after some form of cyberbullying.
    Fr_Chuck's Avatar
    Fr_Chuck Posts: 81,301, Reputation: 7692
    Expert
     
    #3

    Oct 2, 2010, 11:57 AM

    So why is this different than taping a man and women having sex ? They were having sex and someone taped them,
    If they were ashamed of what they were doing, they should not have been doing it them HUH ?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #4

    Oct 2, 2010, 12:18 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck View Post
    so why is this different than taping a man and women having sex ? they were having sex and someone taped them,
    If they were ashamed of what they were doing, they should not have been doing it them HUH ?
    The difference is the left has labeled this tragedy a hate crime.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #5

    Oct 2, 2010, 12:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    The difference is the left has labeled this tragedy a hate crime.
    Was it? If not, what was the motivation? Have the two perps been interviewed?
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #6

    Oct 2, 2010, 02:48 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    I don't think the Rutgers tragedy is much different than a college prank that went bad.

    Now ,if (as you call it) discrimination against gay people ...is a dying philosophy;you would've thought the first place it would've been buried was on a liberal campus.
    Hello again, tom:

    Certainly, there will be holdouts. You may be one of them. But, as a national policy, it's ending.

    I agree it's a prank gone bad - really bad. So what? Does that mean they're not culpable?? I remember as a young lad in the boy scouts, we were cleaning bark off a tree to make a totem pole. I took the blade kind of thing and just jokingly ran it across my friends leg. I cut a gash a couple inches long. Should I have been held culpable?? You betcha.

    excon
    Just_Another_Lemming's Avatar
    Just_Another_Lemming Posts: 437, Reputation: 211
    Full Member
     
    #7

    Oct 2, 2010, 04:57 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck View Post
    so why is this different than taping a man and women having sex ? they were having sex and someone taped them,
    If they were ashamed of what they were doing, they should not have been doing it them HUH ?
    The difference was the young man committed suicide over it.
    It wasn't only taped but it was streamed over the internet for anyone and everyone to see. The kid found out about it, filed a complaint, then jumped off the GW Bridge.

    I don't know if this is as much about discrimination against gays as Excon (& Ellen DeGeneres) appear to believe it is. In my opinion I think it is more about cyber bullying which leads a teen to commit suicide. There have been at least 4 cases prior to this one that I am aware of. Do you remember that young teen who hanged herself? We saw the same amount of outrage over Megan Meier's death that we are seeing over Tyler Clementi's death. Suicide of Megan Meier - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    ScottGem's Avatar
    ScottGem Posts: 64,966, Reputation: 6056
    Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
     
    #8

    Oct 2, 2010, 05:22 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    In the original 'MASH' movie they miked a tent where Hot Lips and Frank Burns were “doing it”. In ' American Pie' they used a webcam to record one of their buddies sexual encounters.
    First, these are movies, FICTION. Second, In MASH, the people were all adults thrust into a situation that cried for letting off steam. Third, in American Pie the boy was aware the webcam was running. So I don't believe either example is valid.

    On the other hand, I'm not sure I agree with excon that this shows the "war" ending. Just as the election of President Obama doesn't mean that prejudice and bigotry has ended in America.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #9

    Oct 2, 2010, 06:39 PM

    Scott ;I don't know if these kids ever saw Mash . But
    I'm fairly certain that they have seen American Pie ,and may very well have been influenced by it. You left off the key part of my observation... that it was a college prank and not intended as some form of gay bashing.
    Alty's Avatar
    Alty Posts: 28,317, Reputation: 5972
    Pets Expert
     
    #10

    Oct 2, 2010, 06:56 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    Scott ;I don't know if these kids ever saw Mash . But
    I'm fairly certain that they have seen American Pie ,and may very well have been influenced by it. You left off the key part of my observation .....that it was a college prank and not intended as some form of gay bashing.
    I don't understand what you're getting at Tom. American Pie is a movie. It's fiction. It's for entertainment. What does that have to do with real life?

    Prank or not, it resulted in a human committing suicide. It was a cruel thing to do, even if it wasn't a hate crime, or gay bashing, but just a prank. I hope the two people that committed this crime have many years to think about what they did, behind bars.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #11

    Oct 2, 2010, 07:14 PM

    Prank or not, it resulted in a human committing suicide. It was a cruel thing to do, even if it wasn't a hate crime, or gay bashing, but just a prank.
    Granted . My comments are about the OP which suggests that the motive was gay bashing . I'm guessing that it was not. Excon also suggests that this incident demonstrates that "discrimination against gay people"... is a dying philosophy" . I was simply pointing out that if it was motivated by anti-gay attitudes then it hardly demonstrates a changing attitude.

    I'll go further... if it takes a judicial decision to change DADT then that also fails to demonstrate changing attitudes. If indeed there were changing attitudes in the military then a judicial decision would not be necessary.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #12

    Oct 2, 2010, 07:22 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    gay bashing . I'm guessing that it was not.
    So the two students had webcams scattered through the dorm in order to catch on film ANYone having sex in a dorm room??

    I don't think so!

    There was ONE webcam, and it was in this particular guy's room. It was there because he was gay. His activities were being watched and Twittered about. When the time was ripe, the webcam was turned on to film.

    Here's an article from The Guardian --

    One [of the accused] was Dharun Ravi, [Clementi's] roommate at college, the other Ravi's friend Molly Wei, who had a room on the same corridor. On the evening of Sunday 19 September, according to the account given by police, Clementi asked his roommate to give him some time alone in the room they shared.

    Ravi agreed, and went down the hall into Wei's room. There, he allegedly logged onto Wei's computer and used it to access through Skype a webcam he had set up on his own computer back in the room he shared with Clementi.

    It is not known whether what happened next was accidental or preconceived, but Ravi and Wei are alleged to have watched Clementi in what authorities described as a "sexual encounter" with another man.

    It is claimed that Ravi then streamed the video live, and that same night broadcast to the 150 followers of his Twitter feed details of his voyeuristic escapade, outing Clementi in the process: "Roommate asked for the room till midnight. I went into molly's room and turned on my webcam. I saw him making out with a dude. Yay."

    Two evenings later, Ravi tweeted: "Anyone with iChat, I dare you to video chat me between the hours of 9.30 and 12. Yes it's happening again."


    Perhaps this incident (along with several others recently) will build sympathy for gays and the enormous stressors they have living among the rest of us so-called "normals."
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #13

    Oct 2, 2010, 09:59 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    I'll go further .....if it takes a judical decision to change DADT then that also fails to demonstrate changing attitudes. If indeed there were changing attitudes in the military then a judicial decision would not be necessary.
    Hello tom:

    That's not the way it works here... If we waited for attitudes in the south to change, there would STILL be TWO sets of facilities down there - one for white people and one for black. The court leads - the nation follows.

    Now, I agree with you, in that it SHOULD be the way YOU say it is... But, it ain't.

    excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #14

    Oct 3, 2010, 02:55 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello tom:

    That's not the way it works here..... If we waited for attitudes in the south to change, there would STILL be TWO sets of facilities down there - one for white people and one for black. The court leads - the nation follows.

    Now, I agree with you, in that it SHOULD be the way YOU say it is.... But, it ain't.

    excon
    So then attitudes aren't changing as you claim .The court is forcing social change. I'll give you my evidence. Wherever gay marriage has been put to the ballot ;it has been defeated.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #15

    Oct 3, 2010, 03:12 AM

    WG
    Are you saying that if his roomy was asking for the room for a straight sex trist,that he wouldn't have set up the webcam prank ?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #16

    Oct 3, 2010, 05:08 AM

    "I went into molly's room and turned on my webcam. I saw him making out with a dude. Yay."

    That sounds like a prank, not a hate crime. Granted, there should be a price to pay, but the vigilantes and opportunists need to back off and let the justice system do its job.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #17

    Oct 13, 2010, 02:23 AM

    Don't ask, don't tell is about to fall. TWO federal judges ruled against it in just the past month...
    A judge slapped an injunction on DADT . I was going to give the old Andrew Jackson line about the judge made the ruling ,let him enforce it... but I see the Obama Administration beat me to it.
    Obama administration appeals gay marriage ruling | Reuters
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #18

    Oct 13, 2010, 05:13 AM

    Hello again, tom:

    Gay marriage and DADT aren't the same issue. Obama does NOT support gay marriage - he said so. He DOES support ending DADT - he said so. The INJUNCTION against DADT wasn't appealed, and I don't think it will be.

    Nope. This is the last gasp of an ancient human emotion.

    excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #19

    Nov 5, 2010, 10:05 AM
    Just thought I'd let you know that Iowa voters fired a shot in the war...

    Iowans dismiss three justices

    Three Iowa Supreme Court justices lost their seats Tuesday in a historic upset fueled by their 2009 decision that allowed same-sex couples to marry.

    Vote totals from 96 percent of Iowa's 1,774 precincts showed Chief Justice Marsha Ternus and Justices David Baker and Michael Streit with less than the simple majority needed to stay on the bench.

    Their removal marked the first time an Iowa Supreme Court justice has not been retained since 1962, when the merit selection and retention system for judges was adopted.

    The decision is expected to echo to courts throughout the country, as conservative activists had hoped. "It appears we're headed for a resounding victory tonight and a historic moment in the state of Iowa," said Bob Vander Plaats, the Sioux City businessman who led a campaign to remove the justices because of the 2009 gay marriage ruling. "The people of Iowa stood up in record numbers and sent a message ... that it is 'We the people,' not 'We the courts.' "
    ITstudent2006's Avatar
    ITstudent2006 Posts: 2,243, Reputation: 329
    Networking Expert
     
    #20

    Nov 5, 2010, 10:32 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck View Post
    If they were ashamed of what they were doing, they should not have been doing it them HUH ?
    I think its less of feeling ashamed and more of an understanding of societies stand on this behavior. Knowing full well ridicul was on the way and his life would be different at that school from that moment on. I don't think he was ashamed, he just understood that society in general won't let this go lightly.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

When did World War 1 start and end? [ 3 Answers ]

When did the first World War start and when did it end?

How many people are gay? [ 5 Answers ]

I know this may be a stupid question but is it true that 10 - 15 percent of the population is gay or bi? If that is true then what are the numbers when it comes to the number of gay and bi people in the world and America? If 10 - 15 percent is not correct then what is and then what are the numbers?...

Gay People? [ 1 Answers ]

Are there gay people in Iran or is that a myth?

Gay People [ 44 Answers ]

Why are christians so judgemental about gay people, I am not gay but have friends and family that are. If god made everybody who made gay people if it is such a problem


View more questions Search