And, as long as you're getting regular PAP smears, cervical cancer can be caught in its early, and easily treatable, stages.
Condoms reduce the incidence of HPV by 70 percent, and that's FAR better protection compared to Gardasil.
NEJM -- Condom Use and the Risk of Genital Human Papillomavirus Infection in Young Women
VAERS defines serious adverse events as adverse events that involve hospitalization, death, permanent disability, and life-threatening illness. There have been at least 28 spontaneous abortions, and 27 deaths. Guillain-Barré Syndrome has been reported, as well as blood clots. Gardasil also contains L-histadine, and histamines have been found to increase clot production five-fold when combined with Surfactants.
This may be biased but its worthy, in my opinion to note, that there have been cases of genital warts due to Gardasil according to this article.
http://www.naturalnews.com/024774.html
The long term effects of this drug ARE NOT KNOWN. So, why is there such a push to have girls who are probably still virgins to have this shot when no one has any idea how long it will "save them" from certain strands?
It's a mystery jab in my opinion. It's never been tested for genotoxicity (DNA damage). It hasn't even been evaluated for its potential to actually cause cancer. It's only protecting you against FOUR stands when there are HUNDREDS.
This reminds me of the time when WHO, who has been interested in population control, offered free vaccines to young women, but refused to vaccinate men. A vaccine for young women was laced with hGC, and with no scientific basis mandated that they had to have it. 28 miscarriages? Sounds more like population control and one less person than a vaccine to me. While I understand that men are unable to develop cervical cancer, but why push for this vaccine? Why are we now mandating 13 year olds with a health gamble?