
Originally Posted by
Moelove
If you had to hear your parents talk sh*t about each other for a majority of your life, you would want to eventually find out who is telling the truth. My dad passed away 7 years ago, and my mom doesn't have the most fair and balanced memory.
The trial lasted for 2 1/2 years, had 3 different judges, and 4 different juries, Only to conclude the trial in Montgomery, AL.
(We live in Georgia). My mom had 142 witnesses, and my dad only had 2, him and his best friend. My Dad remembered the trial as one of the funnier times in his life after the 2nd year. My mom obviously disagrees.
I just think it will be good bathroom material. Definitely better than reading the news these days.
Just my opinion, but I'm going to side with your dad on this one. Reminds me of a custody hearing I attended last year. The exwife showed up with her attorney, mother, sister, fiancé, fiance's sister, and neighbor; the exhusband showed up with his attorney and new wife and was granted placement of his children.
Clearly, there was a lot of anger and resentment going on not only for your parents to talk badly about one another, but also for the simple fact that your mother to dragged 142 people into court... which I seriously hope was a typo, but considering the number of judges and juries, I doubt it.
As I said earlier, you could contact the courthouse directly. I don't know that they'd actually have it readily available and honestly, I don't even know how long the court would retain that information. It certainly seems that the statute of limitations would have run on any possible avenue for either person to take.
And yes, divorce cases tend to be the most "interesting." Stick around for a little while; you wouldn't believe some of the things we see here :)