Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    dlochart's Avatar
    dlochart Posts: 65, Reputation: 1
    Junior Member
     
    #1

    Jan 16, 2010, 07:20 AM
    Roth IRA Contributions
    If you have a Roth IRA and have been contributing to it for a few years and then one year you get _lots_ of overtime and your wife starts to work and combined you make more than the maximum, are you then not allowed to contribute to it? Or is it that you cannot start a Roth if you exceed the maximum allowed salary.

    I find this odd that you can own something but cannot contribute to it.

    Thanks!
    morgaine300's Avatar
    morgaine300 Posts: 6,561, Reputation: 276
    Uber Member
     
    #2

    Jan 22, 2010, 01:49 AM

    The contribution limit is for any given year, and the limits can change from year to year. And personally, I'd rather be making those limits than contributing to it. The advantage is it's tax-free earnings. If I made those limits, I could more than afford to pay the tax on the earnings and still come out ahead.

    I also don't find it odd that you can't contribute to something you own. I'm sure you own lots of things that are giving you no tax advantages. You only get tax advantages under certain circumstances. There's no advantage of simply owning a house -- what if it's paid off, or you can't itemize? Maybe you can itemize one year (thereby taking the interest) and not another year (and can't take the interest). It's all based on circumstances. That IRA isn't any exception - it's still based on circumstances.
    ebaines's Avatar
    ebaines Posts: 12,131, Reputation: 1307
    Expert
     
    #3

    Jan 22, 2010, 07:59 AM

    One option you have is to (a) contribute to a traditional IRA, then (b) roll that traditoinal IRA into a Roth IRA. In Congress's infinite wisdom for 2010 they have eliminated the income limit for rolling traditional IRAs into Roths, even though they haven't eliminated the income limit for contributing directly to a Roth. So you can do this two-step process to end up with the same result. I'm sure the company who is the custodian for your existing Roth IRA will be happy to help you with the process.
    morgaine300's Avatar
    morgaine300 Posts: 6,561, Reputation: 276
    Uber Member
     
    #4

    Jan 23, 2010, 10:53 PM

    That's what it is. I knew I saw something somewhere about a change for 2010 but couldn't for the life of me find it again, even on my brokerage sites. By rolling it into a Roth, are you meaning recharacterizing a current year or converting a past year? (Can't quite see the unlimit amount for a recharacterization when the traditional would have a limit to begin with.)
    ebaines's Avatar
    ebaines Posts: 12,131, Reputation: 1307
    Expert
     
    #5

    Jan 25, 2010, 07:06 AM

    In 2010 you can convert as much of your existing traditional IRA account(s) to Roth as you'd like, regardless of your income level. So you could conceivably convert a traditional IRA worth $1M if you want. It does seems strange that you may not be eligible to contribute directly to a Roth, or if you do you are limited to a $5K contribution, but you can roll an existing IRA of any amount into one - but that's how Congress set the rules, and no one has ever accused Congress of being logical. If you do this, you must pay taxes on the difference between the account value and your after-tax contribiutions - in other words, you pay income tax on the account's appreciation and any pre-tax contributions you may have made. Then you're not allowed to make a withdrawal for at least 5 years. After that, all withdrawals are tax free.

    Here's an article from Schwab with more details:
    2010 Roth Conversion: Look Before You Leap
    morgaine300's Avatar
    morgaine300 Posts: 6,561, Reputation: 276
    Uber Member
     
    #6

    Jan 25, 2010, 10:50 PM

    I guess it didn't make sense to me because I wasn't aware that there was a limit on doing a conversion. (I only just this past year ever looked into doing a prior-year conversion. Unfortunately it was too late into the year to get all the shenanigans done before 12/31. Too bad cause I had LOTS of deductions for 09.)

    Actually, it does make a bit of sense. Converting isn't a new contribution. It's converting money already in an IRA into a different IRA, but it's not the same as making a new contribution to it. (Total IRA money doesn't increase.) It doesn't make much sense that it's specifically a Roth that has income limits. Of course, it's taxable income when you convert -- it would have been taxable at the time of distribution anyway, but perhaps they're trying to get extra current tax? Allowing a one-time split over two years makes it more enticing. In some round-about sick way, everything Congress does ends up making sense, even if only to the government.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Cashing out part of IRA or ROTH IRA due to Hardship [ 1 Answers ]

Can you tell me what are the reasons that you can claim hardship on an IRA or ROTH IRA? I have been unemployed for over a year and need to cashing some of my IRA to just pay bills and live. Are there penalties and taxes that need to be paid on this money? Thanks,

Traditional & Roth IRA contributions [ 3 Answers ]

My wife and I work full time. We are over 50 years of age and have separate IRA's. Together we will gross over $160,000, but our adjusted income will be less than that amount. Based on the information provided, what is the maximum amount we can contribute individually to our traditional and Roth...

Roth IRA contributions [ 1 Answers ]

I have contributed $4000 in my Roth IRA for 2006. Now I find out that it would be better for me to pay the income tax on an inherited annuity rather than having the estate pay the higher income tax rate. The annuity will be about $175,000, and that would put me over the limit for contributing...


View more questions Search