 |
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Jan 13, 2010, 08:24 AM
|
|
Errors in Income Statement - Consecutive year effect
Hi! I'm having some trouble with my accounting work so hopefully someone here can help! Thanks in advance!
Basically, I'm very unsure about the effect of errors in income statement when it comes to the second year.
The question I have basically is that expense account has been understated in 2008. What is the effect on 2008 & 2009's Net Income, Assets, Liabilities and OE accounts.
For 2008, I do now that NI, A, OE are all overstated. With no effect to the L account.
However, does this effect continue for 2009? Or will the opposite effect happen?
Meaning, NI, A, OE accounts all become understated instead of overstated.
Thanks for the help!
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jan 13, 2010, 09:03 PM
|
|
The question doesn't give enough information. If an expense is understated, you can only conclude that net income is overstated and therefore equity overstated. But there is no information about what the other side of that entry would have been - i.e. did the understatement of expense affect an asset or a liability? Either could have happened. So where is the conclusion that assets are overstated and that liabilities weren't affected?
The only way to know what happens in the next year is making the assumption that the problem gets fixed in the next year, and/or by knowing what this error was. (As a very general sort of rule, income statement accounts will go the opposite direction, and balance sheet accounts will work themselves out.)
I have a feeling you are referring to some very specific type of error causing the expense understatement, and thinking that we happen to know what that is when you've presented it out of context.
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Jan 13, 2010, 09:32 PM
|
|
Whoops sorry. Its depreciation expense understated which thus affects accumulated depreciation and asset instead of liability is the one affected.
The question stated that we assume that no correction is made to fix the error in the next year.
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Jan 13, 2010, 09:55 PM
|
|
Just to elaborate, in case I'm asking the question too unclearly, question is written
"Depreciation expense for 2008 was not recorded"
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jan 14, 2010, 02:11 AM
|
|
Yes, that overstates assets then. If the error is not corrected the next year the assets will remain overstated, since accumulated depreciation, well, accumulates. So that number would remain missing. But it would be a sort of "accumulated" overstatement and wouldn't have to balance out with anything else in future years.
If there is no entry made that would correct this, then it wouldn't affect the income statement at all in the next year.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Multiple-step income statement in good form and retained earnings statement
[ 1 Answers ]
Hi
I would like someone to check to see if I did this correctly, if I did not then please help.
Thanks
The Problem is:
The following pretax amounts pertain to River Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Sales... $400,000
Operating Expenses... 84,000
Extraordinary gain... 30,000...
Income statement, owners equity statement and balance sheet
[ 6 Answers ]
Les Fleurs, a boutique in Paris, France, had the following accounts in its accounting records at December 31, 20X2 (amounts in Euros, denoted as "E")
Purchases………………...
E250,000 Freight In……………… E8,000
Sales discounts…………. 4,000 Purchase returns…….. 7,000
Inventory Sales…………………. ...
Effect of errors on income statement
[ 1 Answers ]
I spend hours of trying to figure how different errors effecting income statement. Please let me know if I'm wrong. Thanks
1. Understated ending inventory would cause understated income
2. Overstated beginning inventory would cause understaed income
3. understated purchase would cause...
Total effect + income effect = Substitution effect?
[ 1 Answers ]
In intermediate economics we are told that Total Effect = Income effect + Substitution effect but in advance level this relation is changed to
Total effect+income effect = substitution effect
why is that? Please explain with logic
View more questions
Search
|