Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    galveston's Avatar
    galveston Posts: 451, Reputation: 60
    Full Member
     
    #1

    Jul 19, 2009, 01:25 PM
    Fed audit. Will it ever happen?
    Ron Paul is still trying to get the Fed audited. This has become a long term project, but it looks like the idea may be gaining ground.

    If there is nothing hidden, why the obstructions to an audit?

    What do you think we the citizens can do to bring pressure on our representatives to push for this audit?

    Given the current economic chaos, how vital do you think such an audit is?
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    Jul 19, 2009, 06:41 PM
    What is it he expects to achieve, to prove that it is just as corrupt as any other political institution? I think the facts speak for themselves, it did not act when it should have acted.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #3

    Jul 20, 2009, 03:46 AM
    Maybe the idea of an audit should get the approvoval of the former Goldman Sachs executives running the government first .

    The Fed is already subject to audits by the GAO except that GAO auditors are restricted by law from reviewing monetary policy operations and transactions carried out by the Federal Reserve on behalf of foreign central banks. This restriction was imposed by Congress to assure the independence of the Federal Reserve from political influence.

    The question becomes ;is the Fed autonomous ? Bernanke said :
    “My concern about the legislation is that if the GAO is auditing not only the operational aspects of the programs and the details of the programs but making judgments about our policy decisions would effectively be a takeover of policy by the Congress and a repudiation of the Federal Reserve would be highly destructive to the stability of the financial system, the dollar and our national economic situation.”

    I guess the real question is ;should monitary policy remain indepenent from Congress ? The track records of both institutions are so poor that I can be convinced either way.
    ETWolverine's Avatar
    ETWolverine Posts: 934, Reputation: 275
    Senior Member
     
    #4

    Jul 20, 2009, 07:16 AM

    1) Who would perform the audit? Is there a body in existence that isn't in a position of conflict of interest? If it's a government agency that performs the audit, isn't that government agency answerable to the government they are auditing? And if it's a private body, doesn't that private body have a conflict as well (If they find anything the government doesn't like, they government will make their existence a pure hell, and the government may reward them in order to NOT find anything).

    2) Don't we already have government auditors? They are known as the Inspector General's office. Is Paul suggesting another layer of red tape to accomplish what the IG's office is already doing?

    The concept is fine. But it will never happen, and Paul is again just tilting at windmills. Which usually hurts the one doing the tilting more than it hurts the windmill.

    Elliot
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #5

    Jul 20, 2009, 07:43 AM

    The bill (H.R. 1207 Federal Reserve Transparency Act)has enough co-sponsors(271) in the House to pass ;but I doubt Madame Mimi will let it come to a floor vote. I think the Senate Dems (Ben Nelson of Nebraska )are blocking it on procedural grounds. The President of course envisions an expanded role in the economy for the Fed. So whatever gets to his desk had better be veto proof.

    The auditing authority in bills by Rep Paul ;Sen. Demint would be the GAO. Again ,the GAO already has some auditing authority over the Fed. ;But this bill would greatly expand it.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #6

    Jul 20, 2009, 08:40 AM
    It'll never see the light of day if Mimi has her way. This administration and Congress have a vested interest in avoiding accountability in order to ram their agenda through. That's why Obama is pushing to get health care and cap and trade finished before the August recess, and why he's delaying the July release of budget numbers until after the recess.
    galveston's Avatar
    galveston Posts: 451, Reputation: 60
    Full Member
     
    #7

    Jul 20, 2009, 10:19 AM

    Well, I don't claim to be expert on this, but I have heard for years that there has never been a full audit of the FED. Maybe some of you have a definite answer about that?

    But it should be self evident, given the HUGE debt that taxpayers have to service, that there should be clear assurance that there is not more being extracted from us than is absolutely required.

    I would think as important as this is if there are serious concerns about the honesty of an audit that there could be an independent audit done.

    After all, is this not the hub of everything economic?

    Is Tom's statement that Goldman Sachs execs are running the government? I think that is a real possibility.

    Abraham Lincold started issuing debt free money. He was murdered.

    JFK may have been considering following Lincoln's policy. (Some reports said so). He was murdered.

    Cause and effect? Who knows for sure?
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #8

    Jul 22, 2009, 06:33 AM
    Is Tom's statement that Goldman Sachs execs are running the government? I think that is a real possibility.
    GS alumni Josh Bolton picked Hank Paulson a GS alum for Treasury under Bush . Paulson selected GS alum Neel Kashkari to oversee Treasury's acquisition of $700 billion in distressed mortgage-related assets. Before that ,GS Alum Robert Rubin oversaw the expansion of the Community Reinvestment Act during the Clintoon reign. Tim Geithner ;currently running Treasury is a Rubin protégé . GS alum Stephen Friedman runs the NY office of the Federal Reserve. He worked closely with Geithner ,Rubin ,and Paulson on the AIG bailout . Mark Patterson Geithner's chief of staff at Treasury,is a GS alum. The President just appointed GS Vice Chairman Robert Hormats to serve in the new position at the State Dept ,Undersec. For Economic ,Energy and Agricultural Affairs. Last year GS paid Lawrence Summers, Obama's chief economics adviser and director of the White House's National Economic Council,$135,000 for a single speaking appearance when it was clear he would have a prominent role in a possible Obama Adm.
    There are more examples of the revolving door between public office and the GS board room ,including NJ Governor Jon Corzine.But you get the idea . The relationship is incestuous and any action by former GS execs working in the government that benefits GS bottom line is a conflict of interest.
    ETWolverine's Avatar
    ETWolverine Posts: 934, Reputation: 275
    Senior Member
     
    #9

    Jul 22, 2009, 06:44 AM
    Didn't GS just announce something like $6.2 billion in bonuses?

    Why aren't Obama and his cronies complaining about executive bonuses and pay for GS execs? Could it be because Obama's cronies are all former GS execs themselves?

    Elliot
    galveston's Avatar
    galveston Posts: 451, Reputation: 60
    Full Member
     
    #10

    Jul 22, 2009, 09:43 AM

    Thanks, Tom and Elliot for good informational material.

    I still think that the Federal Reserve Act was and is a national disaster. Maybe I'm wrong.
    twinkiedooter's Avatar
    twinkiedooter Posts: 12,172, Reputation: 1054
    Uber Member
     
    #11

    Jul 23, 2009, 10:41 AM

    Through American history it has been proved that any meddling or investigation into the Fed can be dangerous to your health. Just ask Lincoln, JFK and the folks on the Titanic. (and yes, I know Lincoln was many years prior to the "invention" of the Fed).
    galveston's Avatar
    galveston Posts: 451, Reputation: 60
    Full Member
     
    #12

    Jul 23, 2009, 10:59 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by twinkiedooter View Post
    Through American history it has been proved that any meddling or investigation into the Fed can be dangerous to your health. Just ask Lincoln, JFK and the folks on the Titanic. (and yes, I know Lincoln was many years prior to the "invention" of the Fed).
    The Titanic? I haven't heard that connection.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #13

    Jul 23, 2009, 11:11 AM

    The iceberg was a plant
    ETWolverine's Avatar
    ETWolverine Posts: 934, Reputation: 275
    Senior Member
     
    #14

    Jul 23, 2009, 11:34 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    The iceberg was a plant
    No, an iceberg is made of ice. A plant has leaves and stuff growing off it. You can't have an iceberg that's a plant...

    Oh, wait. Never mind.

    :p

    I'm still trying to understand how the Titanic fits into this. :confused:

    Elliot
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #15

    Jul 23, 2009, 11:38 AM

    The tin foil hatters think the Jesuits conspired with the pro-Fed bankers to get all the anti-Fed people onto a big boat . Then the suicidal Jesuit captain of the Titanic supposedly plowed through an iceberg field to bump off all the anti- Feds.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #16

    Jul 23, 2009, 11:47 AM

    But in the case of Lincoln,according to the tin foil hatters ;it wasn't the damn Papist ,and it certainly wasn't a p.o.ed southerner. It was the Jews... or specifically the Rothschilds... because Lincoln dared to warn the Americans about the "money powers" .
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #17

    Jul 23, 2009, 11:51 AM
    And JFK . Forget all the other theories about the lone gun man ,Castro ,the Mafia ,the CIA ,LBJ... it was the Fed. The tinfoil hatters are convinced that JFK's issuing of Executive Order 11110 was his death warrant .
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #18

    Jul 23, 2009, 11:22 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by ETWolverine View Post
    No, an iceberg is made of ice. A plant has leaves and stuff growing off it. You can't have an iceberg that's a plant...

    Oh, wait. Never mind.

    :p

    I'm still trying to understand how the Titanic fits into this. :confused:

    Elliot
    Elliot he has you there an iceberg is a Lettuce, a nice juicy lettuce, you know that salid green
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #19

    Jul 24, 2009, 05:06 AM

    Yeah ;that's the ticket... lettuce!!
    ETWolverine's Avatar
    ETWolverine Posts: 934, Reputation: 275
    Senior Member
     
    #20

    Jul 24, 2009, 07:18 AM
    The Titanic was sunk by a lettuce that also shot JFK and Lincoln because the Fed and the Jews told it to? :eek:

    As good a theory as any, I guess. :D

    Nothing like a good conspiracy theory. :cool:

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Tax audit. Filed wrong 1099 forms from previous year and received an audit notice [ 1 Answers ]

In 2008 I filed my taxes for 2007 and used the wrong 1099 forms for that specific year, 2007. It seems my tax preparer used my 2006 1099 forms, for the year 2007, and my income was $70,000 higher in 2006 than 2007. Therefore, I reported $70,000 more income than actually earned. My tax preparer...

Audit firm [ 1 Answers ]

How do I find the Audit firm for a company? I am specifically looking for the Audit firm for Google. Thanks!

IRS audit [ 3 Answers ]

Is it true that IRS will audit any back taxes file as a self employed with no 1090misc on IRS record .

Hr system audit [ 1 Answers ]

What is human resource system audit?

Audit firms... [ 9 Answers ]

Hi, Can anyone give me any specific website(s) where I can find History of Ernst & Young in Malaysia? What are the current developments in this firm? Any urgent reply would be appreciated. Thanks a lot and hope to hear the answer very soon.


View more questions Search