[inthebox]

inthebox

Of course everyone can twist and turn the data to support their personal views.
I refer to the topic starter post that used terminology as 'the anointed one' in a failing attempt to attack this democratically elected President.

You and many of your club seem to lack any valid arguments against Obama, and therefore have to fall back in their attacks on using 'the anointed one' . But doing so only shows the emptiness of the 'argument'.

Sad, very sad !

Sarnian,

It is not a matter of twisting data, but stating facts.
Notice that I quoted you, and thus was answering your post not the OP's.
I don't call him or consider him the "annointed one." I think "clueless one" is better :)

As to valid arguments against Obama:

What do you think of his numerous cabinet picks that have not paid their taxes?
[Geithener, daschle to name a few if you did not know]

What do you think of spending trillions of dollars of taxapayor money in what he described as an economic catastrophe. Catastrophe? Think about it for a second. If you had trouble paying for utilities, shelter, food, transportation and have $10 k in credit card debt, what sane person would then propose putting another $20,000 in going out to eat or gatting a new TV?

In this time of economic crisis why is Obama letting taxpayors fund Planned Parenthood ABROAD?

How about Obama closing Gitmo, and Europe not wanting the prisoners?


Its not even 100 days and all this and more...








G&P

[21boat]

So why didn't the republicans correct that in the 8 years?

Ahhhhhh let me take a wild guess could it be the Liberals were in the way..?

Nah that would be to simple and make too much sense to be true. Need more Karma here

How about the Liberals would scream the Republicans are bad people and don't want the poor person to own a home even if they can't afford it.

But the Liberals said I can. Just ask my friend bill Clinton. He started it because he wanted his watch to look good for his history book and family album and didn't care if he stemmed a fake Economy that in the Long term could collapse the economy.

Here we Are...

[sarnian]

How about Obama closing Gitmo, and Europe not wanting the prisoners?

Many European countries have opposed the going-on's at G. was from day one, so why should they now accept prisoners from there ? G. was from start an unconstitutional concentration camp with unconstitutional holding practices and unconstitutional actions. No matter where the captives were accused of (or as in most cases were never accused of at all in the end).

[NeedKarma]

Ahhhhhh let me take a wild guess could it be the Liberals were in the way..........????

Nah that would be to simple and make too much sense to be true. Need more Karma here

How about the Liberals would scream the Republicans are bad people and don't want the poor person to own a home even if they can't afford it.

But the Liberals said I can. Just ask my friend bill Clinton. He started it because he wanted his watch to look good for his history book and family album and didn't care if he stemmed a fake Economy that in the Long term could collapse the economy.

Here we Are.....

So republicans have been effectively neutered? It's amazing how easy it seems to be able to do that.

[sarnian]

So republicans have been effectively neutered? It's amazing how easy it seems to be able to do that.

So that's why they have no balls? :)

[21boat]

So republicans have been effectively neutered? It's amazing how easy it seems to be able to do that.So that's why they have no balls?

So predictable for liberals, 3 one liners. The shock statement. Hit and run with nothing behind it. Big### must suck the brain from ones ability to express oneself past a couple or sentences and child like statements.

We Rep may have lost our ### so to speak but at least we have our brains and calculators. Having ### is one thing, but can that person think in long terms to understand the repercussions of there child like reactions...

Obama did the same thing. He thought in the now when he promised Puerto Rico equality in his campaign speech, in so doing has 4 million of his voters Friends /relatives suing the U.S. for parity. Island Puerto Rico verses the States

In turn, the other 4 million relatives state side are not happy because it shows to them racial discrimination between the cultures. How dumb was that!!

Think of it. The irony here is a black president saying he will bring the people together and single handily took us BACK WARDS in racial tensions!!

What was Obama reason to say this in his speech, to get the Puerto Ricans Friends and relatives in the states to vote for him. Obama did not think of the effects this may have in the many years to come.


So if I had a choice over ### to the real important parts of the body. I choose body not ####.