 |
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Mar 5, 2009, 02:28 PM
|
|
So now we can Build-a-Baby?
Welcome to the future! We can now offer you the option of choosing your new baby's hair, eye AND skin color!
Please, any thoughts would be appreciated, I am not sure what to make of this.
Custom-made babies delivered: Fertility clinic doctor's design-a-kid offer creates uproar
A Brief Summary:
"Fertility Doc will soon offer parents choice on babies' eye, hair color
New York-Do you want blue eyes with your baby? That's one of the questions a fertility clinic will be asking when it begins offering custom-designed babies to would-be moms and dads. Dr. Jeff Steinberg, who operates clinics in Manhattan and Los Angeles, says that within 6 months he plans to let customers choose their baby's eye, hair and even skin color. Steinberg, who helped produce the first test tube baby, admits the technology is not 100 percent perfect and says best results are couples with Scandinavian heritage, whose gene pools are least diluted. Critics, though, have blasted the idea of designer babies, likening it to the pursuit of a master race." Article from Times Herald Record, March 4th,2009
|
|
 |
Vision Expert
|
|
Mar 5, 2009, 02:40 PM
|
|
I can only imagine the problems this will create for the health of the child. Isn't half the joy of bringing a child into the world that it's a perfect mix of you and your significant other?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 5, 2009, 02:50 PM
|
|
I have to question why anyone would feel the need to engineer their children. It's no better than deciding to abort them for any reason, it's just one more way to decide which babies have enough value to live and be loved. I'm sure the Third Reich and Margaret Sanger would be proud.
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Mar 5, 2009, 06:00 PM
|
|
Yet another thing that I do not understand. Why do people tamper with The All Mighty's creations?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 5, 2009, 06:41 PM
|
|
Eugenics... trying to build the proper Übermensch... Nietzsche would be proud. You are right jennifer .it's an attempt to make God irrelevant. The goal is to make humans a bridge between animals and the Übermensch.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Mar 5, 2009, 06:53 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by jennifer1010
Yet another thing that I do not understand. Why do people tamper with The All Mighty's creations?
You mean like plastic surgery?
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Mar 5, 2009, 08:10 PM
|
|
I'm OK with this process only if the child is going to be born with a terminal disorder or the family has had a history of heart disease, diabetes, kidney problems, or something of that nature. I don't think the doctors should tamper with colors of any sort, height, or anything that is physically visible. If you are short and dark/light skinned you should not have any say in changing those characteristics. I think that the technology should only be used to remove some sort of ailment. Of course this brings up the issue of longevity, world food shortage, the cost of healthcare, etc. This is just another bag of worms waiting to be opened.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 05:27 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
You mean like plastic surgery?
Not exactly. One is you deciding what to do with your body and the other is deciding the fate of someone else's life.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 05:50 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Not exactly. One is you deciding what to do with your body and the other is deciding the fate of someone else's life.
Aren't they both "tampering with The All Mighty's creation"? Same with taking steroids.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 07:34 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Aren't they both "tampering with The All Mighty's creation"? Same with taking steroids.
You honestly can't see the difference between tampering with genetics to build your baby and a nose job? With that logic we might as well not get haircuts, shave, fill cavities, or trim our nails.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 07:44 AM
|
|
I can tell the difference but using the reasoning that's it's "tampering with The All Mighty's creation" brings up a bigger picture. I'm sure the tampering issue doesn't stop at the exit of the vulva. It's more of an ethical issue than a religious one. I agree with thoughtiwastheman's post above just for the record.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 07:58 AM
|
|
I want my kid to grow up to be a 6'2" 200 lb. left handed athlete who can thow a 90 mph hook .
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 08:10 AM
|
|
Too late for that!
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 08:14 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
I can tell the difference but using the reasoning that's it's "tampering with The All Mighty's creation" brings up a bigger picture. I'm sure the tampering issue doesn't stop at the exit of the vulva. It's more of an ethical issue than a religious one. I agree with thoughtiwastheman's post above just for the record.
I'm sure Trig Palin will thank God he has the parents he does. I agree with tom, but the ethical considerations should be quite in line with the religious. It's tampering with innocent human life and that should be reason enough to throw up a very red flag.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 08:46 AM
|
|
Trig would not have Down's if his chromosomes were allowed to be manipulated in this instance. I thunk both the mother and child would be happy with this scenario.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 08:58 AM
|
|
Fact is, somewhere around 9 in 10 Down's babies are currently aborted, they don't manipulate their chromosomes. However, if that becomes a viable option I would consider that treatment, not building your baby to order.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 09:00 AM
|
|
"Building a baby to order" is BS designed to sell an article. We are nowhere near that knowledge. What we are near is preventing babies born with defects.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 09:44 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
"Building a baby to order" is BS designed to sell an article. We are nowhere near that knowledge. What we are near is preventing babies born with defects.
So therefore we shouldn't have concerns. Don't be so naïve, NK.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 09:50 AM
|
|
Ok. :)
|
|
 |
Full Member
|
|
Mar 6, 2009, 03:56 PM
|
|
Hey, wasn't it in the novel "1984" that old fashioned sexual reproduction was replaced by genetic engineering?
Maybe that was another novel, I don't remember for sure, but if man can do it, you can be sure someone will.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Ooh baby baby? The song/beat Timberland copied
[ 1 Answers ]
Hi, Thanks for taking time on this,
I've been trying to search for the name of the song that Timbaland remade, I can't seem to find any answers anywhere, Its like the songs been erased from existence.
It was an old school American techno rap beat with ladies singing "Ooh baby baby"
If...
Baby strange illness. Whole body of baby get harden
[ 9 Answers ]
My brother's baby boy 4 months old got a strange illness. He had blood tested, brain scanning, lung checking etc. Everything is normal. But the baby boy got an unpreditable "body harden" illness. That is when it happens, the whole body of the baby get stiff and he can not move, can not cry... We...
View more questions
Search
|