
Originally Posted by
BenD
Hi Judy,
The insurance company that represents the very front vehicle(in the 3 car collision) has sent me a letter to pay approximately $600 for property damage to their vehicle. When I spoke with them, they were willing to settle for approx. half the amount. When I read the letter that they had sent more closely, I was wondering why it was stating "At this time..." and inquired and she told me that the amount they are seeking right now is for damage to the vehicle and that the client has retained a lawyer and has claimed bodily injury. The funny thing is that his vehicle didn't sustain any damage except maybe a black paint streak from the middle car. And he and his family were standing very quietly on the median throughout this whole incident. No one complained of any injury or looked in distress. In fact, two ambulances came and I was the only one looked over by the medics. The property damage if at all that they are seeking if very minimal and now they've retained a lawyer and claims of bodily injury??? If anyone sustained bodily injury, it would be me or the party that I hit directly. Both parties were out of their vehicles walking fine and showed no distress,etc. So, I told the insurance co. that I'm not sure why I should be negotiating a settlement deal when this bodily lawsuit is still out there. This person is trying to take advantage of me and it disgusts me. Like I said, I was the one who would've sustained the most injury if at all (and I don't have any) so I am puzzled why this guys is doing this except but to exhort money from me. How do I combat this? Do I just wait for their lawyer to serve me for bodily injury? Why would someone get a personal lawyer right away and not let their insurance company take care of it? Any advice would be appreciated and what I can expect. Should I hire a private detective? Thanks.
Okay, from the top - and, once again, I don't think you're going to like what I have to say.
Whether the Attorney or the people you hit are taking advantage of you or not is anybody's guess. They do need medical documentation to prove their injuries - or claims or injury.
As far as everybody appearing fine at the scene it is not the least bit unusual for the medical problems to start the next day or the day after that. Shock, disbelief, whatever mask the injuries. I see it all the time and about 90% of the potential Defendants I interview say that same thing - "They weren't hurt at the scene" and/or "They refused medical attention."
If the hit was hard enough that somebody called an ambulance for anyone it was a hard enough hit to injure someone. PLUS them middle car took two hits - the one from you and the one when they hit the car ahead of them. The first car took one, of course.
It is simply not correct that if anyone had sustained injuries it would have been you.
As far as minimal property damage - how much damage was there to all three cars? One of the most tragic accidents I've investigated in all my years was a woman who was left a partial paraplegic. Her head was slightly turned, looking to her left, waiting to pull over behind stopped traffic when she was hit in the rear. I personally photographed her car and couldn't find the damage - which ended up to be very minor and under the driver's side bumper. So, yes, it can happen.
If you want to fight it you go to Court with your proof and try to discredit their proof. "Someone" would get an Attorney now because you have no insurance and they have no one to negotiate the claim with. Otherwise would they be negotiating with your company, sure. Can they negotiate with you? Apparently not because from what you've said, they tried or their insurance company tried.
You are disgusted that they are trying to "extort" money from you; they are disgusted that you were driving without insurance. Be grateful you didn't kill somebody.
Would I hire an investigator this long after the accident? No, I don't think I would - the accident is so old it's cold. Some insurance company has already talked to you and, trust me, they weren't on your side and their questions weren't to help you out.
The other people have an Attorney so they aren't going to talk to anybody.
The insurance company has interviewed the witnesses.
I don't see anything that is going to be determined that will change anything.
Whether you want to try to settle or wait to be served is up to you - it's a roll of the dice and you have to look at all sides of it. Keep in mind that when you go to Court and you were driving uninsured, you don't enter the Courtroom with clean hands.
Everybody makes mistakes. I'm not saying this was deliberate on your part. I'm saying I do a ton of Plaintiff's work and I see problems ahead for you given these circumstances.