
Originally Posted by
screwedin08
To make a long story short, I had to make a choice, it was the house against the credit cards and well the credit cards lost.
I received a summons from a lawyer for credit card debt. The amount owed is heavily padded, about $1700 higher than the limit was on the card, and it was not maxed before I stoppped paying. I am not denying I owed them money, but not what they are stating.
I called the court issuing the summons and the clerk told me I would need to file a response and then she used the words "be careful how you answer". Now I am totally paranoid. I would like them to verify how they are getting to the balance they are showing. I don't even know if it's worth it, since they are the first of many I assume will be coming after me.
Does anyone know the "right" way to respond, thank you in advance.
April
The extra amount is fees, costs, interest. Not the least bit unusual.
Statute could be a defense - the Statute varies from State to State.
If you want to delay the hearing you can ask for verification of the debt, information like that. Maybe - if you're really lucky - they won't be able to locate anything. If they do, it has cost you time and it has cost them time.
I am never happy when I hear the Court Clerks have given legal advice, although I don't know that she did. You may have thought that the "inflated" total was a defense and she may have been warning you that it's frivolous and will not make the Judge happy if you use it.
My feeling is that the Attorney has now put time - which is money - into this and is not going to talk settlement with you. If you want to talk settlement do you have cash on hand to make a one-time, pay it all payment? I can't imagine that the Attorney will take payments.