Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    john65652's Avatar
    john65652 Posts: 1, Reputation: 1
    New Member
     
    #1

    Aug 26, 2008, 11:26 PM
    Satisfying Judgement through collection agency?
    I was recently notified by a collection agency that I have a judgement against me for $1500 resulting from a rental agreement.

    All this resulted from a one-year lease I signed with my then wife in 2005. We were divorced during the lease term, and she stayed in the house for an additional year-and-a half. I assumed that by not renewing the lease I wouldn't be held liable for anything after that first year. But apparently, she went on month-to-month without renewing the lease, which left the original terms (and my obligations) still binding. She then failed to provide a proper 30 day notice, as per the lease, when she moved out resulting in the $1500 judgment.

    Since I didn't do anything to remove myself from the lease, it seems like I'm screwed on that part. However, the collection agency is now telling me that I have to pay the original judgment PLUS their 40% ($2100 total) to satisfy the judgment. I contacted the court (AZ Justice Court) to see if I could just pay the original judgment there but I can't.

    What are my options here?

    Thanks
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #2

    Aug 27, 2008, 06:04 AM
    Hello john:

    You don't HAVE to pay anything. There's no law on the matter. IF you can negotiate a lower settlement amount, that's on you. Certainly there are legal fees and other costs added on. If you're a good negotiator, have at it.

    excon
    JudyKayTee's Avatar
    JudyKayTee Posts: 46,503, Reputation: 4600
    Uber Member
     
    #3

    Aug 27, 2008, 07:38 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by john65652
    I was recently notified by a collection agency that I have a judgement against me for $1500 resulting from a rental agreement.

    All this resulted from a one-year lease I signed with my then wife in 2005. We were divorced during the lease term, and she stayed in the house for an additional year-and-a half. I assumed that by not renewing the lease I wouldn't be held liable for anything after that first year. But apparently, she went on month-to-month without renewing the lease, which left the original terms (and my obligations) still binding. She then failed to provide a proper 30 day notice, as per the lease, when she moved out resulting in the $1500 judgment.

    Since I didn't do anything to remove myself from the lease, it seems like I'm screwed on that part. However, the collection agency is now telling me that I have to pay the original judgment PLUS their 40% ($2100 total) to satisfy the judgment. I contacted the court (AZ Justice Court) to see if I could just pay the original judgment there but I can't.

    What are my options here?

    Thanks

    Without addressing the circumstances and your defense - you would owe the Judgment amount, not the Judgment amount PLUS their commission.
    Chuck G's Avatar
    Chuck G Posts: 6, Reputation: 1
    New Member
     
    #4

    Aug 27, 2008, 04:13 PM
    It is to my understanding (as has been explained to me by the collection agent my company utilizes) that it is not legal to add fees to a judgment unless it has been specifically spelled out and agreed upon to by both parties prior -- in this case the lease agreement. There might be language or clauses stated in there with regards to legal fees incurred if they try to collect monies owed by the tenant(s).
    When my company engages with a collection agent to collect a debt, we pay a percentage of the monies recuperated to the agent as a fee. Nothing is tacked on.
    JudyKayTee's Avatar
    JudyKayTee Posts: 46,503, Reputation: 4600
    Uber Member
     
    #5

    Aug 27, 2008, 06:26 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck G
    It is to my understanding (as has been explained to me by the collection agent my company utilizes) that it is not legal to add fees to a judgment unless it has been specifically spelled out and agreed upon to by both parties prior -- in this case the lease agreement. There might be language or clauses stated in there with regards to legal fees incurred in the event that they try to collect monies owed by the tenant(s).
    When my company engages with a collection agent to collect a debt, we pay a percentage of the monies recuperated to the agent as a fee. Nothing is tacked on.

    In any State I know the Judgment is for the total amount - there is no Statute that allows a Judgment for $X and then adds collection fees - the Judgment is for a set amount. That's it.

    If there is a fee paid to anyone it is part of the total suit and included in the total Judgment.

    Legal fees fall into that category - you are sued for, for example, unpaid rent, damages, late fees, Attorneys' fees and costs. The Judgment is for that total.

    I would ask the collection company - again - what they are talking about and ask them to quote a law that allows this.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Fighting the Collection Agency and Judgement [ 2 Answers ]

I have a situation with a collection agency that I am finding frustrating and a bit unethical. To give you a quick overview: I recently checked my credit report and was shocked when I discovered I had a negative mark on my credit as well as a judgment against me for the amount of $5,700.00. I...

Judgement from a collection agency [ 2 Answers ]

My husband received a judgement from a collection agency in 2004, he did not know the steps to follow in order to see what it was for. I researched the judgment and the majority are medical bills. 2 of the medical bills were paid to the original creditor and one other item was taken from his...

Does a collection agency have more rights to collect a judgement? [ 1 Answers ]

We lost a case in small claims court because we were not well enough prepared to ask the tough questions. The person filing against us is dishonest and we didn't do our job to prove otherwise. He was represented by a collection agency. This took place in Nova Scotia. We arranged to make monthly...


View more questions Search