Originally Posted by Credendovidis
You suggested originally : To which I reacted :
So what I stated was actually : "No I don't BELIEVE in the CLAIMS made by Darwinists and Big Bang theorisers".
And please note that I also made a qualification (I know this seems very hard for you to do, but still try to read and digest what I stated) : I introduced the term "frame guideline".
"I accept the objective supporting evidence provided as a frame guideline to what really happened so long ago".
So I accept the (scientific) evidence as a frame guideline to what happened.
I did not state that I believe this way or that. I did not state that the (scientific) evidence is 100%. The frame guideline is accepted. The main lines are accepted. Evolution as a proper explanation for evolution, or the Big Bang as a proper explanation for the Origin of the Universe.
So there is nothing contradicting in that statement at all.
·